A+ A A-

GUIDELINES FOR 2009 BAR EXAMINATIONS

The Court has adopted the following guidelines for all concerned regarding their conduct and activities within the perimeter of the venue of the Bar Examinations (“Perimeter Area”), to wit:

1. Standard to be Followed. – The bar examinations are in the nature of a court proceeding. Examinees and all other persons within the Perimeter Area are enjoined to observe the same conduct and decorum as they would when attending a court hearing or when within the immediate vicinity thereof.

2. Prohibition of Noise-making Activities. - No noise-making activities of any kind shall be allowed in the Perimeter Area from 6:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. on any of the four (4) Sundays of the Bar Examinations.

3. Prohibited Items. – Alcoholic beverages and any kind of deadly weapon shall be absolutely prohibited within the Perimeter Area for the duration of the Bar Examinations.

4. Proper Decorum to be Observed. – No improper or unbecoming conduct in the Perimeter Area shall be allowed for the duration of the Bar Examinations, including but not limited to: “streaking” or any other form of exhibitionism; ati-atihan or any other form of parades; the playing of live or loud music; cheerleading exhibitions; political demonstrations; gambling; and other similar activities that cause disruption or disturbance to the examinees at any time on the day or on the eve of the examinations.

5. Activities After the Bar Examinations. – Any conduct or activity within the Perimeter Area after 5:00 P.M., or the end of examination time during any of the four (4) Sundays, shall be governed and regulated in accordance with the relevant laws and local government ordinances.

6. Sanctions. – The Court will enforce these guidelines strictly and adopt sanctions against violations thereof under its inherent powers as well as under applicable laws and ordinances.


GUIDELINES FOR 2009 BAR EXAMINATIONS

The Court has adopted the following guidelines for all concerned regarding their conduct and activities within the perimeter of the venue of the Bar Examinations (“Perimeter Area”), to wit:

1. Standard to be Followed. – The bar examinations are in the nature of a court proceeding. Examinees and all other persons within the Perimeter Area are enjoined to observe the same conduct and decorum as they would when attending a court hearing or when within the immediate vicinity thereof.

2. Prohibition of Noise-making Activities. - No noise-making activities of any kind shall be allowed in the Perimeter Area from 6:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. on any of the four (4) Sundays of the Bar Examinations.

3. Prohibited Items. – Alcoholic beverages and any kind of deadly weapon shall be absolutely prohibited within the Perimeter Area for the duration of the Bar Examinations.

4. Proper Decorum to be Observed. – No improper or unbecoming conduct in the Perimeter Area shall be allowed for the duration of the Bar Examinations, including but not limited to: “streaking” or any other form of exhibitionism; ati-atihan or any other form of parades; the playing of live or loud music; cheerleading exhibitions; political demonstrations; gambling; and other similar activities that cause disruption or disturbance to the examinees at any time on the day or on the eve of the examinations.

5. Activities After the Bar Examinations. – Any conduct or activity within the Perimeter Area after 5:00 P.M., or the end of examination time during any of the four (4) Sundays, shall be governed and regulated in accordance with the relevant laws and local government ordinances.

6. Sanctions. – The Court will enforce these guidelines strictly and adopt sanctions against violations thereof under its inherent powers as well as under applicable laws and ordinances.


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

RIZAL COMMERCIAL BA…

RIZAL COMMERCIAL BANKING CORPORATION vs. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE- Protest Tax AssessmentsFACTS:RCBC received the final assessment notice on July 5, 2001. It filed a protest on July 20, 2001. As the protest was not acted upon, it filed a Peti...

Read more

Filing Of Letters O…

Filing Of Letters Of Administration And WillSection 87. Filing of letters of administration and will. Before the executor or administrator of the estate of a deceased owner of registered land may deal with the same, he shall file with the office of t...

Read more

Loss of Citizenship

Loss of CitizenshipYu v. Defensor Santiago – Portuguese passport – Yu’s act of applying for a Portuguese passport despite his naturalization as a Philippine citizen and his act of declaring his nationality as Portuguese in commercial documents, const...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook