A+ A A-

ACTION FOR RECONVEYANCE

ACTION FOR RECONVEYANCE

> Legal and equitable remedy granted to the rightful owner of the land which has been wrongfully or erroneously registered in the name of another for the purpose of compelling the latter to transfer or reconvey the land to him
> After one year from the issuance of the decree, may bring action for reconveyance of the property
> Only to show that the person who secured the registration of the questioned property is not the real owner thereof
> Seeks to transfer or reconvey the land from the registered owner to the rightful owner
> Property is deemed to be held in trust for the real owner by the person in whose name it is registered
> Section 96 is the basis of this remedy

DECREE BECOMES INCONTROVERTIBLE AFTER 1 YEAR FROM THE ISSUANCE OF DECREE

> Action for reconveyance still available as remedy
> Action in personam that it is always as long as the property has not passed to an innocent purchaser for value

RELEVANT ALLEGATIONS

1. That the plaintiff is the owner of the land
2. That the defendant has illegally disposed him of the same

ACTION FOR RECONVEYANCE IS AN ACTION IN PERSONAM

> Binding only upon the parties properly impleaded and duly heard or given an opportunity to be heard
> Directed against specific persons and seek personal judgments
> Court must have jurisdiction over the defendant

THE RTC HAS EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OVER AN ACTION FOR RECONVEYANCE THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY OVER WHICH RECONVEYANCE IS BEING SOUGHT ARE INDISPENSIBLE PARTIES WITHOUT WHOM NO RELIEF IS AVAILABLE ACTION FOR RECONVEYANCE MAY BE BARRED BY THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS LACHES MAY BAR RECOVERY

1. Conduct on the part of the defendant or of one under whom him or one under who he claims, giving rise to the situation of which complaint is made and for which the complainant seeks relief
2. Delay in asserting the complainant’s rights, the complainant having had knowledge or notice, or the defendant’s conduct and having been afforded an opportunity to institute a suit
3. Lack of knowledge or notice on the part of the defendant that the complainant would assert the right on which he bases his suit
4. Inquiry or prejudice to the defendant in the event the relief is afforded the complainant or the suit is not held to be barred

ACTION MAY BE BARRED BY RES JUDICATA

1. Final judgment
2. Court has competent jurisdiction
3. Between the first and second causes of action—there is identity of
parties, subject matter and causes of action

STATE IS NOT BARRED BY PRESCRIPTION PROOF OF OWNERSHIP AND IDENTITY INDISPENSIBLE

ACTION FOR DAMAGES

> Is available when the remedy of an action for reconveyance mayno longer be availed of

> When the land has passed already to the hands of an innocent
purchaser for value


ACTION FOR RECONVEYANCE

ACTION FOR RECONVEYANCE

> Legal and equitable remedy granted to the rightful owner of the land which has been wrongfully or erroneously registered in the name of another for the purpose of compelling the latter to transfer or reconvey the land to him
> After one year from the issuance of the decree, may bring action for reconveyance of the property
> Only to show that the person who secured the registration of the questioned property is not the real owner thereof
> Seeks to transfer or reconvey the land from the registered owner to the rightful owner
> Property is deemed to be held in trust for the real owner by the person in whose name it is registered
> Section 96 is the basis of this remedy

DECREE BECOMES INCONTROVERTIBLE AFTER 1 YEAR FROM THE ISSUANCE OF DECREE

> Action for reconveyance still available as remedy
> Action in personam that it is always as long as the property has not passed to an innocent purchaser for value

RELEVANT ALLEGATIONS

1. That the plaintiff is the owner of the land
2. That the defendant has illegally disposed him of the same

ACTION FOR RECONVEYANCE IS AN ACTION IN PERSONAM

> Binding only upon the parties properly impleaded and duly heard or given an opportunity to be heard
> Directed against specific persons and seek personal judgments
> Court must have jurisdiction over the defendant

THE RTC HAS EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OVER AN ACTION FOR RECONVEYANCE THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY OVER WHICH RECONVEYANCE IS BEING SOUGHT ARE INDISPENSIBLE PARTIES WITHOUT WHOM NO RELIEF IS AVAILABLE ACTION FOR RECONVEYANCE MAY BE BARRED BY THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS LACHES MAY BAR RECOVERY

1. Conduct on the part of the defendant or of one under whom him or one under who he claims, giving rise to the situation of which complaint is made and for which the complainant seeks relief
2. Delay in asserting the complainant’s rights, the complainant having had knowledge or notice, or the defendant’s conduct and having been afforded an opportunity to institute a suit
3. Lack of knowledge or notice on the part of the defendant that the complainant would assert the right on which he bases his suit
4. Inquiry or prejudice to the defendant in the event the relief is afforded the complainant or the suit is not held to be barred

ACTION MAY BE BARRED BY RES JUDICATA

1. Final judgment
2. Court has competent jurisdiction
3. Between the first and second causes of action—there is identity of
parties, subject matter and causes of action

STATE IS NOT BARRED BY PRESCRIPTION PROOF OF OWNERSHIP AND IDENTITY INDISPENSIBLE

ACTION FOR DAMAGES

> Is available when the remedy of an action for reconveyance mayno longer be availed of

> When the land has passed already to the hands of an innocent
purchaser for value


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Guidelines on how t…

Guidelines on how to detect fake titles 1.    Check if the initials, signatures, technical description, annotation and other component elements appearing on the front and at the back of the original are exactly the same as that appearing on the owne...

Read more

LEUNG YEE V. F.L ST…

LEUNG YEE V. F.L STRONG MACHINERY CO. AND WILLIAMSON 37 SCRA 644  FACTS: 1.    First  mortgage:  Compania  Agricola  Filipina  bought  rice-cleaning machinery from the machinery company and this was secured by a chattel mortgage on the machinery and ...

Read more

Lincoln National Li…

Lincoln National Life v. San Juan - Life Insurance CA GR 34588-88, Nov. 27, 1971 Facts: >  An employer insured the life of the employee with two insurance companies. >  The insurance totaled 200T and the only beneficiaries were the employer an...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook