
CANCELLATION OF LIS PENDENS
Category: Land Titles And Deeds
CANCELLATION OF LIS PENDENS
> Ordinarily a notice which has been filed in a proper case cannot be cancelled while the action is pending and undetermined, except in cases expressly provided for by statute
> It may be cancelled upon order by the court or upon action by the Register of Deeds at the instance of the party who caused the registration of the notice
> While the trial court has inherent power to cancel a notice of lis pendens, such power is exercised under express provisions of law—
o If the annotation was for the purpose of molesting the title of the adverse party
o When the annotation isn’t necessary to protect the title of the party who caused it to be recorded
Section 77. Cancellation of lis pendens. Before final judgment, a notice of lis pendens may be canceled upon order of the court, after proper showing that the notice is for the purpose of molesting the adverse party, or that it is not necessary to protect the rights of the party who caused it to be registered. It may also be canceled by the Register of Deeds upon verified petition of the party who caused the registration thereof.
At any time after final judgment in favor of the defendant, or other disposition of the action such as to terminate finally all rights of the plaintiff in and to the land and/or buildings involved, in any case in which a memorandum or notice of lis pendens has been registered as provided in the preceding section, the notice of lis pendens shall be deemed canceled upon the registration of a certificate of the clerk of court in which the action or proceeding was pending
stating the manner of disposal thereof.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
Popular in BATASnatin:
CANCELLATION OF LIS PENDENS
Category: Land Titles And Deeds
CANCELLATION OF LIS PENDENS
> Ordinarily a notice which has been filed in a proper case cannot be cancelled while the action is pending and undetermined, except in cases expressly provided for by statute
> It may be cancelled upon order by the court or upon action by the Register of Deeds at the instance of the party who caused the registration of the notice
> While the trial court has inherent power to cancel a notice of lis pendens, such power is exercised under express provisions of law—
o If the annotation was for the purpose of molesting the title of the adverse party
o When the annotation isn’t necessary to protect the title of the party who caused it to be recorded
Section 77. Cancellation of lis pendens. Before final judgment, a notice of lis pendens may be canceled upon order of the court, after proper showing that the notice is for the purpose of molesting the adverse party, or that it is not necessary to protect the rights of the party who caused it to be registered. It may also be canceled by the Register of Deeds upon verified petition of the party who caused the registration thereof.
At any time after final judgment in favor of the defendant, or other disposition of the action such as to terminate finally all rights of the plaintiff in and to the land and/or buildings involved, in any case in which a memorandum or notice of lis pendens has been registered as provided in the preceding section, the notice of lis pendens shall be deemed canceled upon the registration of a certificate of the clerk of court in which the action or proceeding was pending
stating the manner of disposal thereof.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
Popular in BATASnatin:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 5 days, 14 hours ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 2 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 2 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
Fire insurance poli…
Angela, owner of a condominium unit, insured the same against fire with the ELM Insurance Co., and made the loss payable to his sister, Antonette. In case of loss by fire of the said condominium unit, who may recover on the fire insurance policy? ...
Read moreRELOVA v. LAVAREZ- …
RELOVA v. LAVAREZ- Easement and ServitudeThe enjoyment of the plaintiff of an easement for the maintenance of an irrigation aqueduct and a dam on the lands of defendant for a period of more than 20 years confers title thereto upon the plaintiff by vi...
Read morePEDRO P. PECSON v. …
PEDRO P. PECSON v. COURT OF APPEALS, SPS. NUGUIDFACTS:Pedro Pecson was the owner of a commercial lot on which he built a 4-door-2-storey apartment building. He failed to pay realty taxes amounting to P12k so the lot was sold at public auction to Mame...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

