A+ A A-

DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF PD27 AND RA6657, EXEMPTION DISTINGUISHED FROM RETENTION

DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF PD27 AND RA6657, EXEMPTION DISTINGUISHED FROM RETENTION


> PD27 implemented the Operation Land Transfer Program—covers tenanted rice and corn lands


> The requisites for coverage under the Operation Land Transfer  program are the following—
o The land must be devoted to rice or corn crops
o There must be a system of share-crop or lease-tenancy
obtaining therein


> If either is absent, the landowner may apply for exemption


> PD27 grants each tenant of covered lands a 5 hectare lot, or in case the lot is irrigated, 3 hectares constituting the family size farm. However, said law allows a covered landowner to retain not more than 7 hectares of his land if his aggregate landholding doesn’t exceed 24 hectares


> Consequently, a landowner may keep his whole covered land if its aggregate size doesn’t exceed the retention limit of 7 hectares


> An application for exemption is different from that of retention. They are distinct remedies and thus, judgment in one doesn’t preclude the subsequent institution of the other


> The right to retention is a constitutionally guaranteed right which is subject to the qualifications by the legislature


> Landowners who haven’t exercised their retention rights under PD27 may exercise their retention rights under RA 6657


> The right to retention may be exercised over tenanted land despite the issuance of the certificate of land transfer to farmerbeneficiaries. What must be protected, however, is the right of the tenants to opt to stay on the land chosen to be retained by the landowner or be a beneficiary in another agricultural land with similar or comparable features


> Land awards made pursuant to a government’s agrarian reform program are subject to the exercise of the landowner who is qualified to the right of retention


> The issuance of emancipation patents or certificates of land transfers doesn’t absolutely bar the landowner from retaining the area covered thereby

WAIVER OF RIGHT OF RETENTION

1. Executing an affidavit or any other document duly attested by the MARO, Provincial Agrarian Reform Officer, or Regional Director, indicating that he is expressly waiving his right of retention


2. Signing of the landowner-tenant production agreement and farmer’s undertaking or application for purchase and farmer’s undertaking, covering subject property


3. Entering into a voluntary land transfer/direct payment scheme agreement


4. Offering the subject landholding under VOS scheme and failure to indicate his retained area


5. Signing or submission of other documents indicating consent to have the entire property covered, such as the form letter of the LBP on the disposition of the case and bond portions of a land transfer claim for payment, and the Deed of Assignment, warranties and undertaking and undertaking executed in favor of the LBP


6. Performing acts which constitute estoppel by laches


7. Doing such act or acts as would amount to a valid waiver in accordance with applicable laws and jurisprudence


DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF PD27 AND RA6657, EXEMPTION DISTINGUISHED FROM RETENTION

DISTINCTIVE FEATURES OF PD27 AND RA6657, EXEMPTION DISTINGUISHED FROM RETENTION


> PD27 implemented the Operation Land Transfer Program—covers tenanted rice and corn lands


> The requisites for coverage under the Operation Land Transfer  program are the following—
o The land must be devoted to rice or corn crops
o There must be a system of share-crop or lease-tenancy
obtaining therein


> If either is absent, the landowner may apply for exemption


> PD27 grants each tenant of covered lands a 5 hectare lot, or in case the lot is irrigated, 3 hectares constituting the family size farm. However, said law allows a covered landowner to retain not more than 7 hectares of his land if his aggregate landholding doesn’t exceed 24 hectares


> Consequently, a landowner may keep his whole covered land if its aggregate size doesn’t exceed the retention limit of 7 hectares


> An application for exemption is different from that of retention. They are distinct remedies and thus, judgment in one doesn’t preclude the subsequent institution of the other


> The right to retention is a constitutionally guaranteed right which is subject to the qualifications by the legislature


> Landowners who haven’t exercised their retention rights under PD27 may exercise their retention rights under RA 6657


> The right to retention may be exercised over tenanted land despite the issuance of the certificate of land transfer to farmerbeneficiaries. What must be protected, however, is the right of the tenants to opt to stay on the land chosen to be retained by the landowner or be a beneficiary in another agricultural land with similar or comparable features


> Land awards made pursuant to a government’s agrarian reform program are subject to the exercise of the landowner who is qualified to the right of retention


> The issuance of emancipation patents or certificates of land transfers doesn’t absolutely bar the landowner from retaining the area covered thereby

WAIVER OF RIGHT OF RETENTION

1. Executing an affidavit or any other document duly attested by the MARO, Provincial Agrarian Reform Officer, or Regional Director, indicating that he is expressly waiving his right of retention


2. Signing of the landowner-tenant production agreement and farmer’s undertaking or application for purchase and farmer’s undertaking, covering subject property


3. Entering into a voluntary land transfer/direct payment scheme agreement


4. Offering the subject landholding under VOS scheme and failure to indicate his retained area


5. Signing or submission of other documents indicating consent to have the entire property covered, such as the form letter of the LBP on the disposition of the case and bond portions of a land transfer claim for payment, and the Deed of Assignment, warranties and undertaking and undertaking executed in favor of the LBP


6. Performing acts which constitute estoppel by laches


7. Doing such act or acts as would amount to a valid waiver in accordance with applicable laws and jurisprudence


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

RIGHT OF PLEDGEE TO…

RIGHT OF PLEDGEE TO COLLECT AND RECEIVE AMOUNT DUE ON CREDIT PLEDGEDArt. 2118. If a credit which has been pledged becomes due before it is redeemed, the pledgee may collect and receive the amount due. He shall apply the same to the payment of his  cl...

Read more

DBP V. CA 316 SCRA …

DBP V. CA316 SCRA 650FACTS:Spouses Pineda were the owners of a parcel of land which they mortgaged to DBP in consideration of a loan. As the loan was unpaid, the mortgage was foreclosed and DBP took possession of the property. It was opined by the Mi...

Read more

IN PLEDGE, BID MUST…

IN PLEDGE, BID MUST BE FOR CASHArt.  2114.  All  bids  at  the  public  auction  shall  offer  to  pay the purchase price at once. If any other bid is accepted, the pledgee  is  deemed  to  have  been  received  the  purchase price, as far as the ple...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook