A+ A A-

SECTION 109 OF THE LAND REGISTRATION ACT GOVERNS REPLACEMENT OF LOST DUPLICATE CERTIFICATE

SECTION 109 OF THE LAND REGISTRATION ACT GOVERNS REPLACEMENT OF LOST DUPLICATE CERTIFICATE


> Section 109 is the applicable law in petitions for the issuance of new owner’s duplicate certificate which are lost or stolen or destroyed


> RA 26 applies only in cases of reconstitution of lost or destroyed original certificates of title on file with the RD


> The requirements for the replacement of a lost duplicate certificate are:


1. The registered owner or other person in interest shall send notice of the loss or destruction of the owner’s duplicate certificate of title to the RD of the province or city where the land lies as soon as the loss or destruction is discovered


2. The corresponding petition for the replacement of the loss or destroyed owner’s duplicate certificate shall then be filed in court and entitled in the original case in which the decree of registration was entered


3. The petition shall state under oath the facts and circumstances surrounding such loss or destruction


4. The court may set the petition for hearing, after due notice to the RD and other interested parties as shown in the memorandum of encumbrances noted in the Original Certificate of Title or Transfer Certificate of Title on file in the office of the Register of Deeds


5. After due notice and hearing, the court may direct the issuance of a new duplicate certificate which shall contain a memorandum of the fact that it is issued in place of the lost or destroyed certificate and shall in all respects be entitled to the same faith and credit as the original duplicate


PETITION, WHERE FILED


> A petition for replacement shall be filed with the RTC of the place where the land lies and this is true even if the title was issued pursuant to a public land patent registered in accordance with Section 103 of this decree


SECTION 109 OF THE LAND REGISTRATION ACT GOVERNS REPLACEMENT OF LOST DUPLICATE CERTIFICATE

SECTION 109 OF THE LAND REGISTRATION ACT GOVERNS REPLACEMENT OF LOST DUPLICATE CERTIFICATE


> Section 109 is the applicable law in petitions for the issuance of new owner’s duplicate certificate which are lost or stolen or destroyed


> RA 26 applies only in cases of reconstitution of lost or destroyed original certificates of title on file with the RD


> The requirements for the replacement of a lost duplicate certificate are:


1. The registered owner or other person in interest shall send notice of the loss or destruction of the owner’s duplicate certificate of title to the RD of the province or city where the land lies as soon as the loss or destruction is discovered


2. The corresponding petition for the replacement of the loss or destroyed owner’s duplicate certificate shall then be filed in court and entitled in the original case in which the decree of registration was entered


3. The petition shall state under oath the facts and circumstances surrounding such loss or destruction


4. The court may set the petition for hearing, after due notice to the RD and other interested parties as shown in the memorandum of encumbrances noted in the Original Certificate of Title or Transfer Certificate of Title on file in the office of the Register of Deeds


5. After due notice and hearing, the court may direct the issuance of a new duplicate certificate which shall contain a memorandum of the fact that it is issued in place of the lost or destroyed certificate and shall in all respects be entitled to the same faith and credit as the original duplicate


PETITION, WHERE FILED


> A petition for replacement shall be filed with the RTC of the place where the land lies and this is true even if the title was issued pursuant to a public land patent registered in accordance with Section 103 of this decree


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Liabilities of Part…

What are the rules governing liabilities of parties in case of collision?   1. One vessel at fault – The ship owner of such vessel shall be liable for all resulting damages. 2. Both vessels at fault – Each vessel shall suffer their respective loss...

Read more

CALAGAN V. CFI OF D…

CALAGAN V. CFI OF DAVAO- Useful ExpenseThe HOUSE which private respondent constructed is a useful expense, defined as that which increases the value or augments the income of the property, as contrasted to a necessary expense which is incurred for th...

Read more

Is a Special Prosec…

Is a Special Prosecutor authorized by law to sign and issue preventive suspension?No. With respect to the conduct of administrative investigation, the Special Prosecutor’s authority, insofar as preventive suspension is concerned, is akin to that of t...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook