A+ A A-

Land Registration Circular No. 35

Land Registration Circular No. 35

COMPLIANCE WITH JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS IS MANDATORY


> The court doesn’t acquire jurisdiction to hear the petition

> It is not enough that there is publication in the Official Gazette only for there is a posting requirement also. Failure to comply will nullify the proceedings.


RECONSTITUTION IMPROPER WHERE IS NO TITLE TO BE RECONSTITUTED, OR WHERE THE ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE IN FACT EXISTS


> Sections 18 and 19 of Republic Act 26


ACTION OF THE COURT; RECONSTITUTION; WHEN MANDATORY


> If the court, after hearing, finds that the documents presented, as supported by parole evidence or otherwise, are sufficient, and proper to warrant the reconstitution of the lost or destroyed certificate of title, xxx an order for reconstitution shall be issued


> The clerk of court shall forward the order to the RD and all documents which, pursuant to said order, are to be used as basis of the reconstitution


> If the court finds that there is no sufficient evidence or basis to justify the reconstitution, the petition will be dismissed without prejudice to the right of the parties entitled thereto to file an application for confirmation of title


> Sections 15-17 of RA26


THE REGISTER OF DEEDS IS NOT A PROPER PARTY TO FILE THE PETITION

WRIT OF POSSESSION NOT PROPER IN A RECONSTITUTION PROCEEDING

COURTS ARE CAUTIONED IN GRANTING PETITIONS FOR RECONSTITUTION

ADMINISTRATIVE RECONSTITUTION


> Can only be availed of in case of substantial loss or destruction of land titles due to flood, fire or other force majeure as determined by the Administrator


> Provided that the titles lost or damages should at least be 10% of the total number in the possession of the office of the RD


> That in no case that the number of certificates of titles lost or damaged be less than 500


> Notice of all hearings of the petition for judicial reconstitution shall be furnished the Register of Deeds of the place where the land is situated and to the Administrator of the Land Registration Authority


> No judgment ordering the reconstitution shall be final until the lapse of 15 days from receipt by the RD and by the Administrator of the LRA of the notice of order or judgment without any appeal having been filed by any such officials


DUTY OF LAND REGISTRATION AUTHORITY TO PREPARE INVENTORY SOURCES OF RECONSTITUTION; CONTENTS OF PETITION


> Same sources as those enumerated in Republic Act 26

> Accompanied by an affidavit stating, among other things
o That no deed or other instrument affecting the property had been presented for registration, or if there be any, the names thereof, the date of its presentation, as well as the names of the parties, whether the registration of said deed or instrument is still pending accomplishment
o That the owner’s duplicate is not the subject of litigation or investigation, administrative or judicial, regarding the genuineness or due execution and issuance
o That the owner’s duplicate certificate or co-owner’s duplicate is in due form without any apparent intentional alterations or erasures
o That the certificate was in full force and effect at the time it was lost or destroyed
o That the certificate was covered by a tax declaration regularly issued by the Assessor’s office
o That real estate taxes have been fully paid up to at least 2 years prior to the filing of the petition for reconstitution


ACTION ON THE PETITION

> All reconstituted titles shall be reproduced by the LRA in at least 3 image copies or in whatever means by which the original can be reproduced, one copy to be kept by the LRA, the second copy to be kept by the National Library Archives Division, and the third copy to be secured in a government fire-proof vault, preferably in the Security Printing Plant of the Central Bank


> Such image copy of the original copy of the reconstituted title shall be considered after due authentication by the LRA, through the RD in the province or city where the land is located


> After reconstitution, said owner’s duplicate or co-owner’s duplicate exhibited as basis for the reconstitution shall be surrendered to the RD and a new certificate of title issued in lieu thereof, the original of which shall be kept by the RD and the owner’s duplicate delivered to the registered owner.


FUNCTION OF THE Land Registration Authority TO REVIEW AND ADJUDICATE

> LRA has jurisdiction to act on petitions for administrative reconstitution


> It has the power to review, revise, reverse, modify or affirm on appeal the decision of the reconstituting officer


> Function is adjudicatory in nature—it can properly deliberate on the validity of the titles subject of the reconstitution


REMEDY OF AGGRIEVED PARTY

> A reconstituted title obtained by means of fraud, deceit or other machination is void ab initio as against the party obtaining the same and all persons having knowledge thereof

> There are two remedies available—
o PETITION FOR REVIEW on the ground of fraud, accident, mistake, or excusable negligence filed with the proper court
o APPEAL FROM THE ORDER OF RECONSTITUTION to the LRA administrator


Land Registration Circular No. 35

Land Registration Circular No. 35

COMPLIANCE WITH JURISDICTIONAL REQUIREMENTS IS MANDATORY


> The court doesn’t acquire jurisdiction to hear the petition

> It is not enough that there is publication in the Official Gazette only for there is a posting requirement also. Failure to comply will nullify the proceedings.


RECONSTITUTION IMPROPER WHERE IS NO TITLE TO BE RECONSTITUTED, OR WHERE THE ORIGINAL CERTIFICATE OF TITLE IN FACT EXISTS


> Sections 18 and 19 of Republic Act 26


ACTION OF THE COURT; RECONSTITUTION; WHEN MANDATORY


> If the court, after hearing, finds that the documents presented, as supported by parole evidence or otherwise, are sufficient, and proper to warrant the reconstitution of the lost or destroyed certificate of title, xxx an order for reconstitution shall be issued


> The clerk of court shall forward the order to the RD and all documents which, pursuant to said order, are to be used as basis of the reconstitution


> If the court finds that there is no sufficient evidence or basis to justify the reconstitution, the petition will be dismissed without prejudice to the right of the parties entitled thereto to file an application for confirmation of title


> Sections 15-17 of RA26


THE REGISTER OF DEEDS IS NOT A PROPER PARTY TO FILE THE PETITION

WRIT OF POSSESSION NOT PROPER IN A RECONSTITUTION PROCEEDING

COURTS ARE CAUTIONED IN GRANTING PETITIONS FOR RECONSTITUTION

ADMINISTRATIVE RECONSTITUTION


> Can only be availed of in case of substantial loss or destruction of land titles due to flood, fire or other force majeure as determined by the Administrator


> Provided that the titles lost or damages should at least be 10% of the total number in the possession of the office of the RD


> That in no case that the number of certificates of titles lost or damaged be less than 500


> Notice of all hearings of the petition for judicial reconstitution shall be furnished the Register of Deeds of the place where the land is situated and to the Administrator of the Land Registration Authority


> No judgment ordering the reconstitution shall be final until the lapse of 15 days from receipt by the RD and by the Administrator of the LRA of the notice of order or judgment without any appeal having been filed by any such officials


DUTY OF LAND REGISTRATION AUTHORITY TO PREPARE INVENTORY SOURCES OF RECONSTITUTION; CONTENTS OF PETITION


> Same sources as those enumerated in Republic Act 26

> Accompanied by an affidavit stating, among other things
o That no deed or other instrument affecting the property had been presented for registration, or if there be any, the names thereof, the date of its presentation, as well as the names of the parties, whether the registration of said deed or instrument is still pending accomplishment
o That the owner’s duplicate is not the subject of litigation or investigation, administrative or judicial, regarding the genuineness or due execution and issuance
o That the owner’s duplicate certificate or co-owner’s duplicate is in due form without any apparent intentional alterations or erasures
o That the certificate was in full force and effect at the time it was lost or destroyed
o That the certificate was covered by a tax declaration regularly issued by the Assessor’s office
o That real estate taxes have been fully paid up to at least 2 years prior to the filing of the petition for reconstitution


ACTION ON THE PETITION

> All reconstituted titles shall be reproduced by the LRA in at least 3 image copies or in whatever means by which the original can be reproduced, one copy to be kept by the LRA, the second copy to be kept by the National Library Archives Division, and the third copy to be secured in a government fire-proof vault, preferably in the Security Printing Plant of the Central Bank


> Such image copy of the original copy of the reconstituted title shall be considered after due authentication by the LRA, through the RD in the province or city where the land is located


> After reconstitution, said owner’s duplicate or co-owner’s duplicate exhibited as basis for the reconstitution shall be surrendered to the RD and a new certificate of title issued in lieu thereof, the original of which shall be kept by the RD and the owner’s duplicate delivered to the registered owner.


FUNCTION OF THE Land Registration Authority TO REVIEW AND ADJUDICATE

> LRA has jurisdiction to act on petitions for administrative reconstitution


> It has the power to review, revise, reverse, modify or affirm on appeal the decision of the reconstituting officer


> Function is adjudicatory in nature—it can properly deliberate on the validity of the titles subject of the reconstitution


REMEDY OF AGGRIEVED PARTY

> A reconstituted title obtained by means of fraud, deceit or other machination is void ab initio as against the party obtaining the same and all persons having knowledge thereof

> There are two remedies available—
o PETITION FOR REVIEW on the ground of fraud, accident, mistake, or excusable negligence filed with the proper court
o APPEAL FROM THE ORDER OF RECONSTITUTION to the LRA administrator


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Gen. Insurance …

Gen. Insurance & Surety Corp v. NG Hua - Misrepresentation 106 PHIL 1117 Facts: >  In 1952, General issued a fire policy to Ng Hua to cover the contents of the Central Pomade Factory owned by him. >  There was a provision in the policy that s...

Read more

Citizenship

Citizenship Repatriation under Rule 8171. The only persons entitled to repatriation under RA 8171 are the following: a.            Filipino women who lost their Philippine citizenship by marriage...

Read more

PHILIPS EXPERT V. C…

PHILIPS EXPERT V. CA206 SCRA 457FACTS:Petitioner filed an action against private respondent for the use of the latter of a corporate name confusingly similar with petitioner’s.HELD:Under the corporation code, no corporate name may be allowed by the S...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook