A+ A A-

NATURE OF COMMODATUM

COMMODATUM

NATURE OF COMMODATUM

Art. 1935. The bailee in commodatum acquires the used of the thing loaned but not its fruits; if any compensation is to be paid by him who acquires the use, the contract ceases to be a commodatum. (1941a)

KINDS OF COMMODATUM

1.   ORDINARY COMMODATUM
2.   PRECARIUM—one  whereby  the  bailor  may  demand  the thing loaned at will

Art.   1936.   Consumable   goods   may   be   the   subject   of commodatum  if  the  purpose  of  the  contract  is  not  the consumption   of   the   object,   as   when   it   is   merely   for exhibition. (n)

Art.  1937.  Movable  or  immovable  property  may  be  the object of commodatum. (n)


Art.  1938.  The  bailor  in  commodatum  need  not  be  the owner of the thing loaned. (n)


Art.  1939.  Commodatum  is  purely  personal  in  character
.

Consequently:

(1)   The  death of   either the bailor or the bailee extinguishes the contract;

(2)  The  bailee  can  neither  lend  nor  lease  the  object  of the contract to a third person. However, the members of the bailee's  household  may  make  use  of  the  thing  loaned, unless  there  is  a  stipulation  to  the  contrary,  or  unless  the nature of the thing forbids such use. (n)

Art. 1940. A stipulation that the bailee may make use of the fruits of the thing loaned is valid. (n)
NATURE OF COMMODATUM SUMMARIZED


1.   COMMODATUM IS ESSENTIALLY GRATUITOUS  
a.    A commodatum is essentially gratuitous  
b.   The  contract  ceases  to  be  a  commodatum  if  any compensation  is  to  be  paid  by  the  borrower  who acquires the use
c.    A  commodatum  is  similar  to  a  donation  in  that  it confers a benefit to the recipient

2.   EXTENT OF BAILEE’S RIGHT TO USE is limited to the thing loaned  but  not  to  the  fruits  unless  there  is  stipulation  to the contrary
a.    As the bailor is the owner of the thing loaned, the bailor is naturally entitled to its fruits

3.   CAN  THERE  BE  A  STIPULATION  GRANTING  THE  BAILEE USE OF THE FRUITS?  Of course.  The law sanctions such stipulation BUT such use should only be incidental and not the main  cause of the contract.  Because if it is the main cause, then the contract may that one of a usufruct.

4.   The  PURPOSE  of  a  commodatum  is  the  temporary  use  of thing loaned
a.    If the bailee is not entitled to the use of the thing loaned, the contract may be that of deposit

5.   The  SUBJECT  MATTER  is  generally  a  non-consumable things, whether real or personal
a.    It  may  be  the  case  that  the  purpose  is  for exhibition  only  of  the  thing  loaned.    If  this  is  the case,  then  the  subject  matter  may  be  that  of  a consumable thing

6.   The bailor NEED NOT BE THE OWNER of thing loaned  

7.   Commodatum is PURELY PERSONAL in character.

Consequently:
a.    The  death   of  either  the  bailor   or  the  bailee extinguishes the contract;
b.   The bailee can neither lend nor lease the object of the  contract  to  a  third  person.  However,  the
members of the bailee's household may make use of the thing loaned, unless there is a stipulation to
the  contrary,  or  unless  the  nature  of  the  thing forbids such use.


Related Philippine Law Resources:

NATURE OF COMMODATUM

COMMODATUM

NATURE OF COMMODATUM

Art. 1935. The bailee in commodatum acquires the used of the thing loaned but not its fruits; if any compensation is to be paid by him who acquires the use, the contract ceases to be a commodatum. (1941a)

KINDS OF COMMODATUM

1.   ORDINARY COMMODATUM
2.   PRECARIUM—one  whereby  the  bailor  may  demand  the thing loaned at will

Art.   1936.   Consumable   goods   may   be   the   subject   of commodatum  if  the  purpose  of  the  contract  is  not  the consumption   of   the   object,   as   when   it   is   merely   for exhibition. (n)

Art.  1937.  Movable  or  immovable  property  may  be  the object of commodatum. (n)


Art.  1938.  The  bailor  in  commodatum  need  not  be  the owner of the thing loaned. (n)


Art.  1939.  Commodatum  is  purely  personal  in  character
.

Consequently:

(1)   The  death of   either the bailor or the bailee extinguishes the contract;

(2)  The  bailee  can  neither  lend  nor  lease  the  object  of the contract to a third person. However, the members of the bailee's  household  may  make  use  of  the  thing  loaned, unless  there  is  a  stipulation  to  the  contrary,  or  unless  the nature of the thing forbids such use. (n)

Art. 1940. A stipulation that the bailee may make use of the fruits of the thing loaned is valid. (n)
NATURE OF COMMODATUM SUMMARIZED


1.   COMMODATUM IS ESSENTIALLY GRATUITOUS  
a.    A commodatum is essentially gratuitous  
b.   The  contract  ceases  to  be  a  commodatum  if  any compensation  is  to  be  paid  by  the  borrower  who acquires the use
c.    A  commodatum  is  similar  to  a  donation  in  that  it confers a benefit to the recipient

2.   EXTENT OF BAILEE’S RIGHT TO USE is limited to the thing loaned  but  not  to  the  fruits  unless  there  is  stipulation  to the contrary
a.    As the bailor is the owner of the thing loaned, the bailor is naturally entitled to its fruits

3.   CAN  THERE  BE  A  STIPULATION  GRANTING  THE  BAILEE USE OF THE FRUITS?  Of course.  The law sanctions such stipulation BUT such use should only be incidental and not the main  cause of the contract.  Because if it is the main cause, then the contract may that one of a usufruct.

4.   The  PURPOSE  of  a  commodatum  is  the  temporary  use  of thing loaned
a.    If the bailee is not entitled to the use of the thing loaned, the contract may be that of deposit

5.   The  SUBJECT  MATTER  is  generally  a  non-consumable things, whether real or personal
a.    It  may  be  the  case  that  the  purpose  is  for exhibition  only  of  the  thing  loaned.    If  this  is  the case,  then  the  subject  matter  may  be  that  of  a consumable thing

6.   The bailor NEED NOT BE THE OWNER of thing loaned  

7.   Commodatum is PURELY PERSONAL in character.

Consequently:
a.    The  death   of  either  the  bailor   or  the  bailee extinguishes the contract;
b.   The bailee can neither lend nor lease the object of the  contract  to  a  third  person.  However,  the
members of the bailee's household may make use of the thing loaned, unless there is a stipulation to
the  contrary,  or  unless  the  nature  of  the  thing forbids such use.


Related Philippine Law Resources:

BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

PURPOSE OF A PRELIM…

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION? 1.    To  determine  if  there  is  sufficient  ground  to  engender  a  well-founded   belief   that   a   crime   has   been   committed   and   the respondent is probably guilty thereof, and shou...

Read more

ROBLES v. CA- Actio…

ROBLES v. CA- Action for quieting of title | Free patentFACTSPetitioners (all surnamed Robles) trace their ownership of a parcel of land (9,985 sq m.) to Leon and Silvino, their grandfather and father, respectively. Upon Silvino’s death in 1942, said...

Read more

In the exercise of …

The general rule in determining “just compensation” in eminent domain is the value of the property as of the date of the filing of the complaint.Normally, the time of the taking coincides with the filing of the complaint for expropriation. Hence, man...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook