
NATURE OF COMMODATUM
Category: Obligations and Contracts
COMMODATUM
NATURE OF COMMODATUM
Art. 1935. The bailee in commodatum acquires the used of the thing loaned but not its fruits; if any compensation is to be paid by him who acquires the use, the contract ceases to be a commodatum. (1941a)
KINDS OF COMMODATUM
1. ORDINARY COMMODATUM
2. PRECARIUM—one whereby the bailor may demand the thing loaned at will
Art. 1936. Consumable goods may be the subject of commodatum if the purpose of the contract is not the consumption of the object, as when it is merely for exhibition. (n)
Art. 1937. Movable or immovable property may be the object of commodatum. (n)
Art. 1938. The bailor in commodatum need not be the owner of the thing loaned. (n)
Art. 1939. Commodatum is purely personal in character .
Consequently:
(1) The death of either the bailor or the bailee extinguishes the contract;
(2) The bailee can neither lend nor lease the object of the contract to a third person. However, the members of the bailee's household may make use of the thing loaned, unless there is a stipulation to the contrary, or unless the nature of the thing forbids such use. (n)
Art. 1940. A stipulation that the bailee may make use of the fruits of the thing loaned is valid. (n)
NATURE OF COMMODATUM SUMMARIZED
1. COMMODATUM IS ESSENTIALLY GRATUITOUS
a. A commodatum is essentially gratuitous
b. The contract ceases to be a commodatum if any compensation is to be paid by the borrower who acquires the use
c. A commodatum is similar to a donation in that it confers a benefit to the recipient
2. EXTENT OF BAILEE’S RIGHT TO USE is limited to the thing loaned but not to the fruits unless there is stipulation to the contrary
a. As the bailor is the owner of the thing loaned, the bailor is naturally entitled to its fruits
3. CAN THERE BE A STIPULATION GRANTING THE BAILEE USE OF THE FRUITS? Of course. The law sanctions such stipulation BUT such use should only be incidental and not the main cause of the contract. Because if it is the main cause, then the contract may that one of a usufruct.
4. The PURPOSE of a commodatum is the temporary use of thing loaned
a. If the bailee is not entitled to the use of the thing loaned, the contract may be that of deposit
5. The SUBJECT MATTER is generally a non-consumable things, whether real or personal
a. It may be the case that the purpose is for exhibition only of the thing loaned. If this is the case, then the subject matter may be that of a consumable thing
6. The bailor NEED NOT BE THE OWNER of thing loaned
7. Commodatum is PURELY PERSONAL in character.
Consequently:
a. The death of either the bailor or the bailee extinguishes the contract;
b. The bailee can neither lend nor lease the object of the contract to a third person. However, the
members of the bailee's household may make use of the thing loaned, unless there is a stipulation to
the contrary, or unless the nature of the thing forbids such use.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
NATURE OF COMMODATUM
Category: Obligations and Contracts
COMMODATUM
NATURE OF COMMODATUM
Art. 1935. The bailee in commodatum acquires the used of the thing loaned but not its fruits; if any compensation is to be paid by him who acquires the use, the contract ceases to be a commodatum. (1941a)
KINDS OF COMMODATUM
1. ORDINARY COMMODATUM
2. PRECARIUM—one whereby the bailor may demand the thing loaned at will
Art. 1936. Consumable goods may be the subject of commodatum if the purpose of the contract is not the consumption of the object, as when it is merely for exhibition. (n)
Art. 1937. Movable or immovable property may be the object of commodatum. (n)
Art. 1938. The bailor in commodatum need not be the owner of the thing loaned. (n)
Art. 1939. Commodatum is purely personal in character .
Consequently:
(1) The death of either the bailor or the bailee extinguishes the contract;
(2) The bailee can neither lend nor lease the object of the contract to a third person. However, the members of the bailee's household may make use of the thing loaned, unless there is a stipulation to the contrary, or unless the nature of the thing forbids such use. (n)
Art. 1940. A stipulation that the bailee may make use of the fruits of the thing loaned is valid. (n)
NATURE OF COMMODATUM SUMMARIZED
1. COMMODATUM IS ESSENTIALLY GRATUITOUS
a. A commodatum is essentially gratuitous
b. The contract ceases to be a commodatum if any compensation is to be paid by the borrower who acquires the use
c. A commodatum is similar to a donation in that it confers a benefit to the recipient
2. EXTENT OF BAILEE’S RIGHT TO USE is limited to the thing loaned but not to the fruits unless there is stipulation to the contrary
a. As the bailor is the owner of the thing loaned, the bailor is naturally entitled to its fruits
3. CAN THERE BE A STIPULATION GRANTING THE BAILEE USE OF THE FRUITS? Of course. The law sanctions such stipulation BUT such use should only be incidental and not the main cause of the contract. Because if it is the main cause, then the contract may that one of a usufruct.
4. The PURPOSE of a commodatum is the temporary use of thing loaned
a. If the bailee is not entitled to the use of the thing loaned, the contract may be that of deposit
5. The SUBJECT MATTER is generally a non-consumable things, whether real or personal
a. It may be the case that the purpose is for exhibition only of the thing loaned. If this is the case, then the subject matter may be that of a consumable thing
6. The bailor NEED NOT BE THE OWNER of thing loaned
7. Commodatum is PURELY PERSONAL in character.
Consequently:
a. The death of either the bailor or the bailee extinguishes the contract;
b. The bailee can neither lend nor lease the object of the contract to a third person. However, the
members of the bailee's household may make use of the thing loaned, unless there is a stipulation to
the contrary, or unless the nature of the thing forbids such use.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 5 days, 14 hours ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 2 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 2 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
PURPOSE OF A PRELIM…
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION? 1. To determine if there is sufficient ground to engender a well-founded belief that a crime has been committed and the respondent is probably guilty thereof, and shou...
Read moreROBLES v. CA- Actio…
ROBLES v. CA- Action for quieting of title | Free patentFACTSPetitioners (all surnamed Robles) trace their ownership of a parcel of land (9,985 sq m.) to Leon and Silvino, their grandfather and father, respectively. Upon Silvino’s death in 1942, said...
Read moreIn the exercise of …
The general rule in determining “just compensation” in eminent domain is the value of the property as of the date of the filing of the complaint.Normally, the time of the taking coincides with the filing of the complaint for expropriation. Hence, man...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

