A+ A A-

SIMPLE LOAN OR MUTUUM

SIMPLE LOAN OR MUTUUM

 
Article 1953. A person who receives a loan of money or any other fungible thing acquires the ownership thereof, and is bound to pay the creditor an equal amount of the same kind and quality
 

SIMPLE LOAN OR MUTUUM

>     Contract  whereby  one  of  the  parties  delivers  to  another money    or    another    consumable    thing    with    the understanding that the same amount of the same kind and quality shall be paid
>     It  involves  the  return  of  the  equivalent  only  and  not  the identical  thing  because  the  borrower  acquires  ownership thereof
 

OBLIGATION OF DEBTOR IS TO PAY

>     The law uses the word to pay and the word return
>     The consumption of the thing loaned  is the distinguishing character   of   the   contract   of   mutuum   from   that   of commodatum
>     The promise of the borrower to pay is the consideration for the obligation of the lender to furnish the loan
>     A loan is a bilateral contract 

NO ESTAFA IS COMMITTED BY A PERSON WHO REFUSES TO PAY HIS DEBT OR DENIES ITS EXISTENCE

>     The borrower acquires ownership
>     Being  the  owner,  the  borrower  can  dispose  of  the  thing borrowed   and   his   act   will   not   be   considered   as appropriation thereof 


Related Philippine Law Resources:

SIMPLE LOAN OR MUTUUM

SIMPLE LOAN OR MUTUUM

 
Article 1953. A person who receives a loan of money or any other fungible thing acquires the ownership thereof, and is bound to pay the creditor an equal amount of the same kind and quality
 

SIMPLE LOAN OR MUTUUM

>     Contract  whereby  one  of  the  parties  delivers  to  another money    or    another    consumable    thing    with    the understanding that the same amount of the same kind and quality shall be paid
>     It  involves  the  return  of  the  equivalent  only  and  not  the identical  thing  because  the  borrower  acquires  ownership thereof
 

OBLIGATION OF DEBTOR IS TO PAY

>     The law uses the word to pay and the word return
>     The consumption of the thing loaned  is the distinguishing character   of   the   contract   of   mutuum   from   that   of commodatum
>     The promise of the borrower to pay is the consideration for the obligation of the lender to furnish the loan
>     A loan is a bilateral contract 

NO ESTAFA IS COMMITTED BY A PERSON WHO REFUSES TO PAY HIS DEBT OR DENIES ITS EXISTENCE

>     The borrower acquires ownership
>     Being  the  owner,  the  borrower  can  dispose  of  the  thing borrowed   and   his   act   will   not   be   considered   as appropriation thereof 


Related Philippine Law Resources:

BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

REGISTRATION UNDER …

REGISTRATION UNDER THE SPANISH MORTGAGE LAW DISCONTINUED> On February 16, 1976, PD 892 was issued decreeing the discontinuance of the system of registration under the Spanish Mortgage Law and the use of Spanish titles as evidence in land registration...

Read more

WHY DO WE MAKE A DI…

WHY DO WE MAKE A DISTINCTION BETWEEN A SUBSTANTIAL AND  FORMAL AMENDMENTS?Whether or not it is for the  same offense,  or the  second offense includes  or  is  necessarily  included  in  the  offense  charged  in  the first  information,  or  is  an ...

Read more

CID vs, JAVIER- Not…

CID vs. JAVIER- Notarial ProhibitionNotarial prohibition is required to start the running of prescription. Also Registration of the Immovable without the registration of the easement extinguishes the easement.FACTS: The easement in dispute here is an...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook