A+ A A-

No interest shall be due unless it has been expressly stipulated in writing

REQUISITES FOR RECOVERY OF INTEREST

1.   The payment of interest must be expressly stipulated
2.   The agreement must be in writing
3.   The interest must be lawful
 

EXISTENCE OF STIPULATION TO PAY INTEREST

1.   If a particular rate of interest has been expressly stipulated by  the  parties,  that  interest,  and  not  the  legal  rate  of interest, shall be applied
2.   If the exact rate of interest is not mentioned, the legal rate of 12% shall be payable
3.   No  increase  in  interest  shall  be  due  unless  such  increase has also been expressly stipulated
4.   It is only in contracts of loan, with or without security, that interest may be stipulated and demanded.  
5.   The  receipt  of  the  creditor  of  interest  payment  up  to  a certain  date  of  a  loan  that  has  already  matured  does  not ipso  facto  result  in  the  renewal  or  extension  of  maturity period of the loan up to said date.
6.   Stipulation  of  interest  must  be  mutually  agreed  upon  by the parties  and  may  not be  unilaterally increased by only one  of  the  parties.    This  would  violate  consensuality  and mutuality  of  contract  (PNB  v.  CA).    But  the  parties  can agree  upon  a  formula  for  determining  the  interest  rate,
over  which  neither  party  has  control  (ex:  interest  will  be adjusted quarterly at a rate of 3% plus the prevailing 91-day T-bill rate, etc.).  But if the formula says “interest will be based on T-bill rates and other interest-setting policies as the bank may determine,” this is not valid.  
 

ESCALATION CLAUSE

     Clause  which  authorizes  the  automatic  increase  in  the interest
     An  escalation clause is valid when it  is  accompanied by a De-Escalation Clause.  A de-escalation clause is a clause, which  provides  that  the  rate  of  interest  agreed  upon  will also be automatically reduced.  There must be a specified formula  for  arriving  at  the  adjusted  interest  rate,  over which neither party has any discretion.
 

LIABILITY   FOR   INTEREST   EVEN   IN   THE   ABSENCE   OF STIPULATION

1.   Indemnity for damages—the debtor in delay is liable to pay legal  interest  as  indemnity  for  damages  even  in  the absence of stipulation for the payment of interest
a.    Rate of penalty interest agreed upon
b.   Interest  cannot  be  recovered  upon  unliquidated claims  or  damages  except  when  the  demand  can be established with reasonable certainty

c.    In the absence of express agreement as to the rate of  interest,  CB  Circular  #416  fixes  the  interest  at 12% per annum for loans, forbearance, goods and credits;  and  judgments  involving  such  loans  and
forbearance
d.   Interest as indemnity for damages is payable only in  case  of  default  or  non-performance  of  the
contract
2.   Interest  accruing  from  unpaid  interest—interest  due  shall earn  interest  from  the  time  it  is  judicially  demanded although the obligation may be silent upon this point


No interest shall be due unless it has been expressly stipulated in writing

REQUISITES FOR RECOVERY OF INTEREST

1.   The payment of interest must be expressly stipulated
2.   The agreement must be in writing
3.   The interest must be lawful
 

EXISTENCE OF STIPULATION TO PAY INTEREST

1.   If a particular rate of interest has been expressly stipulated by  the  parties,  that  interest,  and  not  the  legal  rate  of interest, shall be applied
2.   If the exact rate of interest is not mentioned, the legal rate of 12% shall be payable
3.   No  increase  in  interest  shall  be  due  unless  such  increase has also been expressly stipulated
4.   It is only in contracts of loan, with or without security, that interest may be stipulated and demanded.  
5.   The  receipt  of  the  creditor  of  interest  payment  up  to  a certain  date  of  a  loan  that  has  already  matured  does  not ipso  facto  result  in  the  renewal  or  extension  of  maturity period of the loan up to said date.
6.   Stipulation  of  interest  must  be  mutually  agreed  upon  by the parties  and  may  not be  unilaterally increased by only one  of  the  parties.    This  would  violate  consensuality  and mutuality  of  contract  (PNB  v.  CA).    But  the  parties  can agree  upon  a  formula  for  determining  the  interest  rate,
over  which  neither  party  has  control  (ex:  interest  will  be adjusted quarterly at a rate of 3% plus the prevailing 91-day T-bill rate, etc.).  But if the formula says “interest will be based on T-bill rates and other interest-setting policies as the bank may determine,” this is not valid.  
 

ESCALATION CLAUSE

     Clause  which  authorizes  the  automatic  increase  in  the interest
     An  escalation clause is valid when it  is  accompanied by a De-Escalation Clause.  A de-escalation clause is a clause, which  provides  that  the  rate  of  interest  agreed  upon  will also be automatically reduced.  There must be a specified formula  for  arriving  at  the  adjusted  interest  rate,  over which neither party has any discretion.
 

LIABILITY   FOR   INTEREST   EVEN   IN   THE   ABSENCE   OF STIPULATION

1.   Indemnity for damages—the debtor in delay is liable to pay legal  interest  as  indemnity  for  damages  even  in  the absence of stipulation for the payment of interest
a.    Rate of penalty interest agreed upon
b.   Interest  cannot  be  recovered  upon  unliquidated claims  or  damages  except  when  the  demand  can be established with reasonable certainty

c.    In the absence of express agreement as to the rate of  interest,  CB  Circular  #416  fixes  the  interest  at 12% per annum for loans, forbearance, goods and credits;  and  judgments  involving  such  loans  and
forbearance
d.   Interest as indemnity for damages is payable only in  case  of  default  or  non-performance  of  the
contract
2.   Interest  accruing  from  unpaid  interest—interest  due  shall earn  interest  from  the  time  it  is  judicially  demanded although the obligation may be silent upon this point


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Cha v. Cha - Insura…

Cha v. Cha - Insurable Interest 277 SCRA 690 (1997) Facts: >  Spouses Nilo Cha and Stella Uy-Cha, as lessees, entered into a lease contract with CKS Development Corporation (CKS), as lessor. >  One of the stipulations of the one (1) year leas...

Read more

HEIRS OF VENCILAO, …

HEIRS OF VENCILAO, SR. V. COURT OF APPEALS 288 SCRA 574  FACTS: Petitioners  sought  the  quieting  of  title,  recovery  of  possession  and ownership  over  a  parcel  of  land.    They  allege  that  they  are  the  rightful owners,  having  inher...

Read more

DACANAY v. ASISTIO,…

DACANAY v. ASISTIO, JR.FACTS:This is a petition for mandamus to the non-action of the city registered being a public road intended for public use is considered part of the public domain and therefore outside the commerce of man. After hearing the par...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook