
No interest shall be due unless it has been expressly stipulated in writing
Category: Obligations and Contracts
REQUISITES FOR RECOVERY OF INTEREST
1. The payment of interest must be expressly stipulated2. The agreement must be in writing
3. The interest must be lawful
EXISTENCE OF STIPULATION TO PAY INTEREST
1. If a particular rate of interest has been expressly stipulated by the parties, that interest, and not the legal rate of interest, shall be applied2. If the exact rate of interest is not mentioned, the legal rate of 12% shall be payable
3. No increase in interest shall be due unless such increase has also been expressly stipulated
4. It is only in contracts of loan, with or without security, that interest may be stipulated and demanded.
5. The receipt of the creditor of interest payment up to a certain date of a loan that has already matured does not ipso facto result in the renewal or extension of maturity period of the loan up to said date.
6. Stipulation of interest must be mutually agreed upon by the parties and may not be unilaterally increased by only one of the parties. This would violate consensuality and mutuality of contract (PNB v. CA). But the parties can agree upon a formula for determining the interest rate,
over which neither party has control (ex: interest will be adjusted quarterly at a rate of 3% plus the prevailing 91-day T-bill rate, etc.). But if the formula says “interest will be based on T-bill rates and other interest-setting policies as the bank may determine,” this is not valid.
ESCALATION CLAUSE
Clause which authorizes the automatic increase in the interest An escalation clause is valid when it is accompanied by a De-Escalation Clause. A de-escalation clause is a clause, which provides that the rate of interest agreed upon will also be automatically reduced. There must be a specified formula for arriving at the adjusted interest rate, over which neither party has any discretion.
LIABILITY FOR INTEREST EVEN IN THE ABSENCE OF STIPULATION
1. Indemnity for damages—the debtor in delay is liable to pay legal interest as indemnity for damages even in the absence of stipulation for the payment of interest
a. Rate of penalty interest agreed upon
b. Interest cannot be recovered upon unliquidated claims or damages except when the demand can be established with reasonable certainty
c. In the absence of express agreement as to the rate of interest, CB Circular #416 fixes the interest at 12% per annum for loans, forbearance, goods and credits; and judgments involving such loans and
forbearance
d. Interest as indemnity for damages is payable only in case of default or non-performance of the
contract
2. Interest accruing from unpaid interest—interest due shall earn interest from the time it is judicially demanded although the obligation may be silent upon this point
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
No interest shall be due unless it has been expressly stipulated in writing
Category: Obligations and Contracts
REQUISITES FOR RECOVERY OF INTEREST
1. The payment of interest must be expressly stipulated2. The agreement must be in writing
3. The interest must be lawful
EXISTENCE OF STIPULATION TO PAY INTEREST
1. If a particular rate of interest has been expressly stipulated by the parties, that interest, and not the legal rate of interest, shall be applied2. If the exact rate of interest is not mentioned, the legal rate of 12% shall be payable
3. No increase in interest shall be due unless such increase has also been expressly stipulated
4. It is only in contracts of loan, with or without security, that interest may be stipulated and demanded.
5. The receipt of the creditor of interest payment up to a certain date of a loan that has already matured does not ipso facto result in the renewal or extension of maturity period of the loan up to said date.
6. Stipulation of interest must be mutually agreed upon by the parties and may not be unilaterally increased by only one of the parties. This would violate consensuality and mutuality of contract (PNB v. CA). But the parties can agree upon a formula for determining the interest rate,
over which neither party has control (ex: interest will be adjusted quarterly at a rate of 3% plus the prevailing 91-day T-bill rate, etc.). But if the formula says “interest will be based on T-bill rates and other interest-setting policies as the bank may determine,” this is not valid.
ESCALATION CLAUSE
Clause which authorizes the automatic increase in the interest An escalation clause is valid when it is accompanied by a De-Escalation Clause. A de-escalation clause is a clause, which provides that the rate of interest agreed upon will also be automatically reduced. There must be a specified formula for arriving at the adjusted interest rate, over which neither party has any discretion.
LIABILITY FOR INTEREST EVEN IN THE ABSENCE OF STIPULATION
1. Indemnity for damages—the debtor in delay is liable to pay legal interest as indemnity for damages even in the absence of stipulation for the payment of interest
a. Rate of penalty interest agreed upon
b. Interest cannot be recovered upon unliquidated claims or damages except when the demand can be established with reasonable certainty
c. In the absence of express agreement as to the rate of interest, CB Circular #416 fixes the interest at 12% per annum for loans, forbearance, goods and credits; and judgments involving such loans and
forbearance
d. Interest as indemnity for damages is payable only in case of default or non-performance of the
contract
2. Interest accruing from unpaid interest—interest due shall earn interest from the time it is judicially demanded although the obligation may be silent upon this point
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 5 days, 20 hours ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 2 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 2 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
Cha v. Cha - Insura…
Cha v. Cha - Insurable Interest 277 SCRA 690 (1997) Facts: > Spouses Nilo Cha and Stella Uy-Cha, as lessees, entered into a lease contract with CKS Development Corporation (CKS), as lessor. > One of the stipulations of the one (1) year leas...
Read moreHEIRS OF VENCILAO, …
HEIRS OF VENCILAO, SR. V. COURT OF APPEALS 288 SCRA 574 FACTS: Petitioners sought the quieting of title, recovery of possession and ownership over a parcel of land. They allege that they are the rightful owners, having inher...
Read moreDACANAY v. ASISTIO,…
DACANAY v. ASISTIO, JR.FACTS:This is a petition for mandamus to the non-action of the city registered being a public road intended for public use is considered part of the public domain and therefore outside the commerce of man. After hearing the par...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

