A+ A A-

NATURE OF A SURETY’S UNDERTAKING

NATURE OF A SURETY’S UNDERTAKING 

1.   CONTRACTUAL    AND    ACCESSORY    BUT    DIRECT—The contractual obligation of the surety is merely an accessory or  collateral  to  the  obligation  contracted  by  the  principal.  BUT,  his  liability  to  the  creditor  is  direct,  primary,  and absolute. 

2.   LIABILITY IS LIMITED BY THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT—The extent of a surety’s liability is determined only by the terms   of   the   contract   and   cannot   be   extended   by implication. 

3.   LIABILITY  ARISES  ONLY  IF  PRINCIPAL  DEBTOR  IS  HELD LIABLE—If  the  principal  debtor  and  the  surety  are  held liable, their liability to pay the creditor would be  solidary.  But, the surety does not incur liability unless and until the principal debtor is held liable. 
a.    A  surety  is  bound  by  a  judgment  against  the principal even though the party was not a party to
the proceedings. 
b.   The  creditor  may  sue,  separately  or  together,  the principal  debtor  and  the  surety  (since  they  are solidarily bound).
c.    Generally,  a  demand  or  notice  of  default  is  not required to fix the surety’s liability. 
d.   An   accommodation   party   (one   who   signs   an instrument as maker, drawer, acceptor, or indorser
without  consideration  and  only  for  the  purpose  of lending his name) is, in effect, a surety.  He is thus
liable to pay the holder of the instrument, subject to reimbursement from the accommodated party.

e.    A  surety  bond  is  void  where  there  is  no  principal debtor. 

4.   SURETY  IS  NOT  ENTITLED  TO  EXHAUSTION—A  surety  is not  entitled  to  the  exhaustion  of  the  properties  of  the principal  debtor  since  the  surety  assumes  a  solidary liability for the fulfillment of the principal obligation. 

5.   THE  UNDERTAKING  IS  TO  THE  CREDITOR,  NOT  TO  THE PRINCIPAL  DEBTOR—The  debtor  cannot  claim  that  the surety  breached  its  obligation  to  pay  for  the  principal obligation  because  there  is  no  obligation  as  between  the surety  and  the  debtor.    If  the  surety  does  not  pay,  the
principal debtor is still not relieved of his obligation. 

6.   SURETY   NOT   ENTITLED   TO   NOTICE   OF   PRINCIPAL’S DEFAULT—the  surety  is  bound  to  take  notice  of  the principal’s default to perform the obligation

7.   PRIOR DEMAND BY THE CREDITOR UPON  PRINCIPAL NOT REQUIRED—the right of the creditor to proceed against the surety  alone  exists  independently  of  his  right  to  proceed against  the  principal  where  both  surety  and  principal  are equally bound

8.   SURETY  IS  NOT  EXONERATED  BY  NEGLECT  OF  ANOTHER TO SUE PRINCIPAL—mere want of diligence or forbearance doesn’t  affect  the  creditor’s  rights  vis-à-vis  the  surety, unless the surety requires him by appropriate notice to sue on  the  obligation.    The  raison  d’etre  for  the  rule  is  that
there  is  nothing  to  prevent  the  creditor  from  proceeding against the principal at any time 


NATURE OF A SURETY’S UNDERTAKING

NATURE OF A SURETY’S UNDERTAKING 

1.   CONTRACTUAL    AND    ACCESSORY    BUT    DIRECT—The contractual obligation of the surety is merely an accessory or  collateral  to  the  obligation  contracted  by  the  principal.  BUT,  his  liability  to  the  creditor  is  direct,  primary,  and absolute. 

2.   LIABILITY IS LIMITED BY THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT—The extent of a surety’s liability is determined only by the terms   of   the   contract   and   cannot   be   extended   by implication. 

3.   LIABILITY  ARISES  ONLY  IF  PRINCIPAL  DEBTOR  IS  HELD LIABLE—If  the  principal  debtor  and  the  surety  are  held liable, their liability to pay the creditor would be  solidary.  But, the surety does not incur liability unless and until the principal debtor is held liable. 
a.    A  surety  is  bound  by  a  judgment  against  the principal even though the party was not a party to
the proceedings. 
b.   The  creditor  may  sue,  separately  or  together,  the principal  debtor  and  the  surety  (since  they  are solidarily bound).
c.    Generally,  a  demand  or  notice  of  default  is  not required to fix the surety’s liability. 
d.   An   accommodation   party   (one   who   signs   an instrument as maker, drawer, acceptor, or indorser
without  consideration  and  only  for  the  purpose  of lending his name) is, in effect, a surety.  He is thus
liable to pay the holder of the instrument, subject to reimbursement from the accommodated party.

e.    A  surety  bond  is  void  where  there  is  no  principal debtor. 

4.   SURETY  IS  NOT  ENTITLED  TO  EXHAUSTION—A  surety  is not  entitled  to  the  exhaustion  of  the  properties  of  the principal  debtor  since  the  surety  assumes  a  solidary liability for the fulfillment of the principal obligation. 

5.   THE  UNDERTAKING  IS  TO  THE  CREDITOR,  NOT  TO  THE PRINCIPAL  DEBTOR—The  debtor  cannot  claim  that  the surety  breached  its  obligation  to  pay  for  the  principal obligation  because  there  is  no  obligation  as  between  the surety  and  the  debtor.    If  the  surety  does  not  pay,  the
principal debtor is still not relieved of his obligation. 

6.   SURETY   NOT   ENTITLED   TO   NOTICE   OF   PRINCIPAL’S DEFAULT—the  surety  is  bound  to  take  notice  of  the principal’s default to perform the obligation

7.   PRIOR DEMAND BY THE CREDITOR UPON  PRINCIPAL NOT REQUIRED—the right of the creditor to proceed against the surety  alone  exists  independently  of  his  right  to  proceed against  the  principal  where  both  surety  and  principal  are equally bound

8.   SURETY  IS  NOT  EXONERATED  BY  NEGLECT  OF  ANOTHER TO SUE PRINCIPAL—mere want of diligence or forbearance doesn’t  affect  the  creditor’s  rights  vis-à-vis  the  surety, unless the surety requires him by appropriate notice to sue on  the  obligation.    The  raison  d’etre  for  the  rule  is  that
there  is  nothing  to  prevent  the  creditor  from  proceeding against the principal at any time 


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Negotiable Instrume…

Sec.  10.  Terms, when sufficient. -  The instrument need not follow the language of this Act, but any terms are sufficient which clearly indicate an intention to conform to the requirements hereof. Illustrative case: JIMENEZ V. BUCOY 103 PHIL 40  F...

Read more

HOW ARE CRIMINAL AC…

HOW ARE CRIMINAL ACTIONS INSTITUTED?1. For offenses where a preliminary investigation is required, by filing a complaint with the proper officer for the purpose of conducting the requisite preliminary investigation 2. For  the  other  offenses,  by  ...

Read more

CLASSIFICATION OF C…

CLASSIFICATION OF CRIMES AS TO GRAVITY   I. The basis is the penalty prescribed by the RPC and not the actual penalty imposed by the court. If both imprisonment and fine are prescribed as penalties, it is the penalty of imprisonment which is used a...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook