A+ A A-

RIGHT OF THIRD PERSON WHO PLEDGED HIS OWN ROPERTY

Art. 2120. If a third party secures an obligation by pledging his  own  movable  property  under  the  provisions  of  Article 2085  he  shall  have  the  same  rights  as  a  guarantor  under Articles 2066 to 2070, and Articles 2077 to 2081. He is not prejudiced  by  any  waiver   of  defense  by  the  principal obligor. (n)
 

RIGHT OF THIRD PERSON WHO PLEDGED HIS OWN PROPERTY

>  A third person who is not a party to the principal obligation may secure the latter by pledging his own property

>  The law grants him the same rights as a guarantor and he cannot  be  prejudiced  by  any  waiver  or  defense  by  the principal debtor
 
Art.  2121.  Pledges  created  by  operation  of  law,  such  as those  referred  to  in  Articles  546,  1731,  and  1994,  are governed by the foregoing articles  on the possession, care and  sale  of  the  thing  as  well  as  on  the  termination  of  the pledge. However, after payment  of the debt and expenses, the remainder of the price of the sale shall be delivered to the obligor. (n)
 
Art. 2122. A thing under a pledge by operation of law may be sold only after demand of the amount for which the thing is  retained.  The  public  auction  shall  take  place  within  one month  after  such  demand.  If,  without  just  grounds,  the creditor  does  not  cause  the  public  sale  to  be  held  within such period, the debtor may require the return of the thing. (n)
 
Art.    2123.    With    regard    to    pawnshops    and    other establishments, which are engaged in making loans secured by  pledges,  the  special  laws  and  regulations  concerning them shall be  observed, and  subsidiarily, the  provisions  of his Title. (1873a)


RIGHT OF THIRD PERSON WHO PLEDGED HIS OWN ROPERTY

Art. 2120. If a third party secures an obligation by pledging his  own  movable  property  under  the  provisions  of  Article 2085  he  shall  have  the  same  rights  as  a  guarantor  under Articles 2066 to 2070, and Articles 2077 to 2081. He is not prejudiced  by  any  waiver   of  defense  by  the  principal obligor. (n)
 

RIGHT OF THIRD PERSON WHO PLEDGED HIS OWN PROPERTY

>  A third person who is not a party to the principal obligation may secure the latter by pledging his own property

>  The law grants him the same rights as a guarantor and he cannot  be  prejudiced  by  any  waiver  or  defense  by  the principal debtor
 
Art.  2121.  Pledges  created  by  operation  of  law,  such  as those  referred  to  in  Articles  546,  1731,  and  1994,  are governed by the foregoing articles  on the possession, care and  sale  of  the  thing  as  well  as  on  the  termination  of  the pledge. However, after payment  of the debt and expenses, the remainder of the price of the sale shall be delivered to the obligor. (n)
 
Art. 2122. A thing under a pledge by operation of law may be sold only after demand of the amount for which the thing is  retained.  The  public  auction  shall  take  place  within  one month  after  such  demand.  If,  without  just  grounds,  the creditor  does  not  cause  the  public  sale  to  be  held  within such period, the debtor may require the return of the thing. (n)
 
Art.    2123.    With    regard    to    pawnshops    and    other establishments, which are engaged in making loans secured by  pledges,  the  special  laws  and  regulations  concerning them shall be  observed, and  subsidiarily, the  provisions  of his Title. (1873a)


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Requirement Of Due …

Requirement Of Due ProcessNava v. Sorsogon 421 SCRA 1 [2004] Formal investigation is a mandatory requirement in disbarment proceedings (Uytengco III vs. Baduel, 477 SCRA 621 [2005]). Frias v. Bautista Lozada A.C. No. 6656, May 4, 2006 The defens...

Read more

MEANING OF A HOLDER…

Sec.  26.  What  constitutes  holder  for  value.  -  Where  value  has  at any  time  been  given  for  the  instrument,  the  holder  is  deemed  a holder for value in respect to all parties who become such prior to that time.  MEANING OF A HOLDER ...

Read more

Recovery Of Unpaid …

Recovery Of Unpaid Balance In ForeclosureUnder the law, in a sale on installment of a movable, if the vendor has availed himself of the right to foreclose the chattel mortgage, he shall have no further action against the purchaser to recover the unpa...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook