A+ A A-

SEQUESTRATION OR JUDICIAL DEPOSIT

SEQUESTRATION OR JUDICIAL DEPOSIT

 
Art.  2005.  A  judicial  deposit  or  sequestration  takes  place when  an  attachment  or  seizure  of  property  in  litigation  is ordered. (1785)
 
Art.  2006. Movable as  well as immovable property may be the object of sequestration. (1786)
 
Art.    2007.    The    depositary    of    property    or    objects sequestrated  cannot  be  relieved  of  his  responsibility  until the  controversy  which  gave  rise  thereto  has  come  to  an end, unless the court so orders. (1787a)
 
Art. 2008. The depositary of property sequestrated is bound to comply, with respect to the same, with all the obligations of a good father of a family. (1788)

 

WHEN JUDICIAL DEPOSIT TAKES PLACE

     A deposit may be constituted judicially or extrajudicially
     Takes place when an attachment or seizure of property in litigation is ordered by the court
 

NATURE AND PURPOSE OF JUDICIAL DEPOSIT

     Judicial deposit is auxiliary to a case pending in court
     Purpose is to maintain the status quo during the pendency of the litigation or to insure the rights of the parties to the property in case of a favorable judgment
 

OBLIGATION OF DEPOSITARY OF SEQUESTRATED PROPERTY

     The  depositary  of  sequestered  property  is  the  person appointed by the court
     He  has  the  obligation  to  take  care  of  the  property  with diligence  of a good father  of  a family  and  he  may not be relieved of his responsibility until the litigation is ended or the court so orders 

Art.  2009.  As  to  matters  not  provided  for  in  this  Code, judicial  sequestration  shall  be  governed  by  the  Rules  of Court. (1789)
 

APPLICABLE LAW

     The  law  on  judicial  deposit  is  remedial  and  the  Rules  of Court is thus applicable
     Rule   57   on   preliminary   attachment,   Rule   59   on receivership, and Rule 60 on replevin 


SEQUESTRATION OR JUDICIAL DEPOSIT

SEQUESTRATION OR JUDICIAL DEPOSIT

 
Art.  2005.  A  judicial  deposit  or  sequestration  takes  place when  an  attachment  or  seizure  of  property  in  litigation  is ordered. (1785)
 
Art.  2006. Movable as  well as immovable property may be the object of sequestration. (1786)
 
Art.    2007.    The    depositary    of    property    or    objects sequestrated  cannot  be  relieved  of  his  responsibility  until the  controversy  which  gave  rise  thereto  has  come  to  an end, unless the court so orders. (1787a)
 
Art. 2008. The depositary of property sequestrated is bound to comply, with respect to the same, with all the obligations of a good father of a family. (1788)

 

WHEN JUDICIAL DEPOSIT TAKES PLACE

     A deposit may be constituted judicially or extrajudicially
     Takes place when an attachment or seizure of property in litigation is ordered by the court
 

NATURE AND PURPOSE OF JUDICIAL DEPOSIT

     Judicial deposit is auxiliary to a case pending in court
     Purpose is to maintain the status quo during the pendency of the litigation or to insure the rights of the parties to the property in case of a favorable judgment
 

OBLIGATION OF DEPOSITARY OF SEQUESTRATED PROPERTY

     The  depositary  of  sequestered  property  is  the  person appointed by the court
     He  has  the  obligation  to  take  care  of  the  property  with diligence  of a good father  of  a family  and  he  may not be relieved of his responsibility until the litigation is ended or the court so orders 

Art.  2009.  As  to  matters  not  provided  for  in  this  Code, judicial  sequestration  shall  be  governed  by  the  Rules  of Court. (1789)
 

APPLICABLE LAW

     The  law  on  judicial  deposit  is  remedial  and  the  Rules  of Court is thus applicable
     Rule   57   on   preliminary   attachment,   Rule   59   on receivership, and Rule 60 on replevin 


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Pacto De Retro Sale

Pacto De Retro SaleThe essence of a pacto de retro sale is that title and ownership of the property sold is immediately vested in the vendee a retro, subject to the restrictive condition of repurchase by the vendor a retro within the period provided ...

Read more

DEPOSIT G.R. No. 12…

DEPOSITUnder the law, the hotel-keeper cannot free himself from responsibility by posting notices to the effect that he is not liable for the articles brought by the guest. Any stipulation between the hotel-keeper and the guest whereby the responsibi...

Read more

RONQUILLO vs. ROCO-…

RONQUILLO vs. ROCO- Easement of Right of WayEasements of right of way may not be acquired by prescription because it is not a continuous easement.FACTS:Petitioners’ parcel of land was connected to the Naga Market Place and Igualdad St. by an easement...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook