SPOUSES BENITEZ V. CA 266 SCRA 242
Category: Property, Ownership and Its Modifications
SPOUSES BENITEZ V. CA
266 SCRA 242
FACTS:
Macapagal filed an action against petitioners for recovery of an encroached portion of lot they purchased. Thereafter, they bought another lot adjacent to Macapagal. Upon a relocation survey, they discovered part of it was being encroached by petitioners. Despite demands, the petitioners refused to vacate.
HELD:
Prior possession is not always a condition sine que non in ejectment.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
- ACCESSION DISCRETA (RIGHT OF ACCESSION WITH RESPECT TO WHAT IS PRODUCED BY PROPERTY) -
- SPOUSES LUIS CRUZ V. SPOUSES ALEJANDRO FERNANDO SR. DECEMBER 9, 2005 -
- DOMINICA CUTANDA V. HEIRS OF ROBERTO CUTANDA 335 SCRA 418 -
- HEIRS OF JUAN OCLARIT V. COURT OF APPEALS 233 SCRA 239 -
- OCLARIT V. COURT OF APPEALS 233 SCRA 239 -
SPOUSES BENITEZ V. CA 266 SCRA 242
Category: Property, Ownership and Its Modifications
SPOUSES BENITEZ V. CA
266 SCRA 242
FACTS:
Macapagal filed an action against petitioners for recovery of an encroached portion of lot they purchased. Thereafter, they bought another lot adjacent to Macapagal. Upon a relocation survey, they discovered part of it was being encroached by petitioners. Despite demands, the petitioners refused to vacate.
HELD:
Prior possession is not always a condition sine que non in ejectment.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
- ACCESSION DISCRETA (RIGHT OF ACCESSION WITH RESPECT TO WHAT IS PRODUCED BY PROPERTY) -
- SPOUSES LUIS CRUZ V. SPOUSES ALEJANDRO FERNANDO SR. DECEMBER 9, 2005 -
- DOMINICA CUTANDA V. HEIRS OF ROBERTO CUTANDA 335 SCRA 418 -
- HEIRS OF JUAN OCLARIT V. COURT OF APPEALS 233 SCRA 239 -
- OCLARIT V. COURT OF APPEALS 233 SCRA 239 -
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 6 days, 8 hours ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 3 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 3 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
COVERAGE OF THE 200…
COVERAGE OF THE 2009 BAR EXAMINATIONPOLITICAL AND PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAWSEPTEMBER 6, 2009(First Sunday, Morning)This examination covers decisions of the Supreme Court, promulgated up to 30 June 2008, and Republic Acts, Presidential Decrees and Exec...
Read moreDoctrine Of Corpora…
Doctrine Of Corporate Negligence Or Corporate ResponsibilityThe complaint alleged that PSI as owner, operator and manager of Medical City Hospital did not perform the necessary supervision or exercise diligent efforts in the supervision of Dr. Ampil ...
Read moreNocum v. Laguna Tay…
In a jeepney, Angela, a passenger, was injured because of the flammable material brought by Antonette, another passenger. Antonette denied her baggage to be inspected invoking her right to privacy. Should the jeepney operator be held liable for damag...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more