AGUILAR V. CA 227 SCRA 472- Co-ownership
Category: Property, Ownership and Its Modifications
AGUILAR V. CA
227 SCRA 472
FACTS:
Brothers Virgilio and Senen bought in co-ownership a house where their father would stay. It was first agreed upon that Virgilio would have 2/3 and Senen 1/3 but in the written agreement, they had a 50-50 share. Upon the death of the father, Virgilio asked Senen to vacate the house and they should sell the same. Senen didn't want to leave. Virgilio filed forpartition.
HELD:
No co-owner shall be obliged to remain in the co-ownership and that each co-owner may demand at any time the partition of the thing owned in common insofar as his share is concerned.Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
AGUILAR V. CA 227 SCRA 472- Co-ownership
Category: Property, Ownership and Its Modifications
AGUILAR V. CA
227 SCRA 472
FACTS:
Brothers Virgilio and Senen bought in co-ownership a house where their father would stay. It was first agreed upon that Virgilio would have 2/3 and Senen 1/3 but in the written agreement, they had a 50-50 share. Upon the death of the father, Virgilio asked Senen to vacate the house and they should sell the same. Senen didn't want to leave. Virgilio filed forpartition.
HELD:
No co-owner shall be obliged to remain in the co-ownership and that each co-owner may demand at any time the partition of the thing owned in common insofar as his share is concerned.Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 6 days, 8 hours ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 3 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 3 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
Guidelines for the …
Guidelines for the Exercise of the Right to Organize of Government Employees, etc.[EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 180] June 01, 1987 PROVIDING GUIDELINES FOR THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT TO ORGANIZE OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES,...
Read moreWhat is a public ut…
A business or service engaged in regularly supplying the public with some commodity or service of public consequence sush as electricity, gas, water, transportation, telephone or telegraph service.
Read moreCivil Procedure Mem…
ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007 Remedial Law SUMMER REVIEW Civil Procedure Law Memory Aid Download the full text from the attachments area below.
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more