COSTABELLA CORP. V. CA- Legal Easement, Right of Way 193 SCRA 333
Category: Property, Ownership and Its Modifications
COSTABELLA CORP. V. CA- Legal Easement, Right of Way
193 SCRA 333
FACTS:
Petitioner was the owner of a beachfront property, it later constructed a beach resort thereto. The private respondents on the other hand were the owners of the adjoining properties. Prior to the construction of the resort, the property was being used as passageway in going to the provincial road and city proper. Upon the construction of the first phase, pathway was closed but they were given an alternate route.HELD:
The following are the requirements for the compulsory easement of right of way—
1. The property is surrounded by estate of others and there is no dequate outlet to a public highway
2. It must be established at the point least prejudicial to the servient state and insofar as consistent with this rule, where the distance from the dominant estate to a public highway may be the shortest
3. There must be payment of the proper indemnity
4. The isolation should not be due to the proprietor’s own acts he private respondents failed to show compliance with the
abovementioned requirements.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
COSTABELLA CORP. V. CA- Legal Easement, Right of Way 193 SCRA 333
Category: Property, Ownership and Its Modifications
COSTABELLA CORP. V. CA- Legal Easement, Right of Way
193 SCRA 333
FACTS:
Petitioner was the owner of a beachfront property, it later constructed a beach resort thereto. The private respondents on the other hand were the owners of the adjoining properties. Prior to the construction of the resort, the property was being used as passageway in going to the provincial road and city proper. Upon the construction of the first phase, pathway was closed but they were given an alternate route.HELD:
The following are the requirements for the compulsory easement of right of way—
1. The property is surrounded by estate of others and there is no dequate outlet to a public highway
2. It must be established at the point least prejudicial to the servient state and insofar as consistent with this rule, where the distance from the dominant estate to a public highway may be the shortest
3. There must be payment of the proper indemnity
4. The isolation should not be due to the proprietor’s own acts he private respondents failed to show compliance with the
abovementioned requirements.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 5 days, 23 hours ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 3 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 3 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
CAISIP V. PEOPLE 36…
CAISIP V. PEOPLE 36 SCRA 17 FACTS: Cabalag and her husband cultivated a parcel of land in Hacienda Palico, which was owned by Roxas y Cia. Caisip is the overseer of the land. The land cultivated was previously tenanted by the fat...
Read moreCIR vs. PHILIPPINE …
FACTS: PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. had zero taxable income for 2000 but would have been liable for Minimum Corporate Income Tax based on its gross income. However, PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. did not pay the Minimum Corporate Income Tax using as basis i...
Read moreREGISTRATION OF PAT…
REGISTRATION OF PATENTSSection 103. Certificates of title pursuant to patents. Whenever public land is by the Government alienated, granted or conveyed to any person, the same shall be brought forthwith under the operation of this Decree. It shall be...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more