
EASEMENT AGAINST NUISANCE
Category: Property, Ownership and Its Modifications
EASEMENT AGAINST NUISANCE
Art. 682. Every building or piece of land is subject to the easement which prohibits the proprietor or possessor from committing nuisance through noise, jarring, offensive odor, smoke, heat, dust, water, glare and other causes.
REASON FOR PROHIBITING A NUISANCE
- A nuisance is that which, among others, annoys or offends the senses and it should therefore be prohibited
WHO IS THE SERVIENT IN AN EASEMENT AGAINST NUISANCE?
- The proprietor or possessor of the building or piece of land who commits the nuisance through noise, jarring, offensive odor, is servient in an easement against nuisance
WHO IS DOMINANT IN AN EASEMENT AGAINST NUISANCE?
- The general public or anyone injured by the nuisance
PERHAPS, NOT A TRUE EASEMENT
- While a true easement prohibits the owner from that which he could lawfully do were it not for the existence of the easement, a nuisance is something that is done or allowed unlawfully, whether or not a person has made a notarial prohibition
Art. 683. Subject to zoning, health, police and other laws and regulations, factories and shops may be maintained provided the least possible annoyance is caused to the neighborhood.
LATERAL AND SUBJACENT SUPPORT
Sec. 684. No proprietor shall make such excavations upon his land as to deprive any adjacent land or building of sufficient lateral or subjacent support.
THE EASEMENT OF LATERAL AND SUBJACENT SUPPORT ISNT A TRUE EASEMENT
EXAMPLES
1. Of lateral support—while a person may excavate on his own land, he cannot do so if by such action, adjacent buildings would collapse or adjacent lands crumble
2. Of subjacent support—A owns a parcel of land with a house, but underneath the soil is being used by B in connection with a tunnel
LATERAL DISTINGUISHED FROM SUBJACENT
The support is lateral when both the land being supported and the supporting land are on the same plane, when the supported is above the supporting land, the support is subjacent
Art. 685. Any stipulation or testamentary provision allowing excavations that cause danger to an adjacent land or building shall be void.
RULE ON DANGEROUS EXCAVATIONS
A person is protected even against his own folly, in the interest of public safety
Art. 686. The legal easement of lateral and subjacent support is not only for buildings standing at the time the excavations are made
but also for constructions that may be erected.
Art. 687. Any proprietor intending to make any excavation contemplated in the three preceding articles shall notify all owners of adjacent lands.
NOTIFICATION RE INTENDED EXCAVATIONS
1. Notice isn’t required if there is actual knowledge of the excavation. Otherwise, notice is mandatory.
2. Even if there be notice, the excavation should deprive the other owners of lateral or subjacent support. This is true even if the others consent or even if the excavation is carried out skillfully.
3. Notice is required to enable adjoining owners to take proper precautions.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
EASEMENT AGAINST NUISANCE
Category: Property, Ownership and Its Modifications
EASEMENT AGAINST NUISANCE
Art. 682. Every building or piece of land is subject to the easement which prohibits the proprietor or possessor from committing nuisance through noise, jarring, offensive odor, smoke, heat, dust, water, glare and other causes.
REASON FOR PROHIBITING A NUISANCE
- A nuisance is that which, among others, annoys or offends the senses and it should therefore be prohibited
WHO IS THE SERVIENT IN AN EASEMENT AGAINST NUISANCE?
- The proprietor or possessor of the building or piece of land who commits the nuisance through noise, jarring, offensive odor, is servient in an easement against nuisance
WHO IS DOMINANT IN AN EASEMENT AGAINST NUISANCE?
- The general public or anyone injured by the nuisance
PERHAPS, NOT A TRUE EASEMENT
- While a true easement prohibits the owner from that which he could lawfully do were it not for the existence of the easement, a nuisance is something that is done or allowed unlawfully, whether or not a person has made a notarial prohibition
Art. 683. Subject to zoning, health, police and other laws and regulations, factories and shops may be maintained provided the least possible annoyance is caused to the neighborhood.
LATERAL AND SUBJACENT SUPPORT
Sec. 684. No proprietor shall make such excavations upon his land as to deprive any adjacent land or building of sufficient lateral or subjacent support.
THE EASEMENT OF LATERAL AND SUBJACENT SUPPORT ISNT A TRUE EASEMENT
EXAMPLES
1. Of lateral support—while a person may excavate on his own land, he cannot do so if by such action, adjacent buildings would collapse or adjacent lands crumble
2. Of subjacent support—A owns a parcel of land with a house, but underneath the soil is being used by B in connection with a tunnel
LATERAL DISTINGUISHED FROM SUBJACENT
The support is lateral when both the land being supported and the supporting land are on the same plane, when the supported is above the supporting land, the support is subjacent
Art. 685. Any stipulation or testamentary provision allowing excavations that cause danger to an adjacent land or building shall be void.
RULE ON DANGEROUS EXCAVATIONS
A person is protected even against his own folly, in the interest of public safety
Art. 686. The legal easement of lateral and subjacent support is not only for buildings standing at the time the excavations are made
but also for constructions that may be erected.
Art. 687. Any proprietor intending to make any excavation contemplated in the three preceding articles shall notify all owners of adjacent lands.
NOTIFICATION RE INTENDED EXCAVATIONS
1. Notice isn’t required if there is actual knowledge of the excavation. Otherwise, notice is mandatory.
2. Even if there be notice, the excavation should deprive the other owners of lateral or subjacent support. This is true even if the others consent or even if the excavation is carried out skillfully.
3. Notice is required to enable adjoining owners to take proper precautions.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 6 days, 5 hours ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 3 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 3 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
Sale With Pacto de …
Sale With Pacto de Retro Transfer of OwnershipA sale with pacto de retro transfers the legal title to the vendee a retro. The essence of a pacto de retro sale is that the title and ownership of the property sold are immediately vested in the vendee a...
Read moreHOW JUDGMENT IS SAT…
HOW JUDGMENT IS SATISFIED- Recovery of the plaintiff > Where judgment is rendered against the government, execution shall first issue against the persons who have been joined as co-defendants, and if the execution is returned unsatisfied, then the da...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

