A+ A A-

SANTOS v. BERNABE

SANTOS v. BERNABE


If two things of identical or dissimilar nature are mixed and the owners of the things are in good faith, OR if the mixture occurs accidentally and cannot be separated without injury, each owner shall acquire a right in the mixture proportionate to the part belonging to him, according to the value of the things mixed or comingled.


FACTS:


Santos deposited 778 cavans and 38 kilos of palay in the warehouse of Bernabe. At the same time, Tiongson also deposited 1,026 cavans and 9 kilos of palay. The share of Tiongson and Santos were mixed together and cannot be separated.


Later on and for some unknown reason, Tiongson files a case against Bernabe to recover the 1,026 cavans and 9 kilos of palay deposited in Bernabe’s warehouse. So Tiongson files for a petition for a writ of attachment and the Court granted it. Bernabe’s properties were attached, including only 924 cavans of rice and 31 ½ kilos of palay. These were sold at a public auction and the proceeds were delivered to Tiongson.


Santos tried to intervene in the attachment of the palay but then the sheriff had already proceeded with the attachment, so Santos files a complaint. He says that Tiongson cannot claim the 924 cavans of palay; he says that by asking for the attachment of the properties, Tiongson is claiming that the cavans of rice all belonged to Bernabe and not to him.


ISSUE:

Whether or not Tiongson can claim the 924 cavans of rice as his own.


HELD:

No, both Tiongson and Santos must divide the cavans and palay proportionately.


The cavans belonging to Santos, having been mixed with those belonging to Tiongson, the following rule prescribed is Article 381 of the Civil Code: “If, by will of one of their owners, two things of identical or dissimilar nature are mixed, or if the mixture occurs accidentally, if in the latter case, the things cannot be separated without injury, each owner shall acquire a right in the mixture proportionate to the part belonging to him, according to the value of the things mixed or comingled.”


The number of kilos in a cavan not having been determined, the Court took the proportion only of the 924 cavans of palay which were attached andsold, therby giving Santos, who deposited 778 cavans, 398.49 and Tiongson, who deposited 1,026 cavans, 525.51, or the value thereof at the rate of 3Php per cavan.


SANTOS v. BERNABE

SANTOS v. BERNABE


If two things of identical or dissimilar nature are mixed and the owners of the things are in good faith, OR if the mixture occurs accidentally and cannot be separated without injury, each owner shall acquire a right in the mixture proportionate to the part belonging to him, according to the value of the things mixed or comingled.


FACTS:


Santos deposited 778 cavans and 38 kilos of palay in the warehouse of Bernabe. At the same time, Tiongson also deposited 1,026 cavans and 9 kilos of palay. The share of Tiongson and Santos were mixed together and cannot be separated.


Later on and for some unknown reason, Tiongson files a case against Bernabe to recover the 1,026 cavans and 9 kilos of palay deposited in Bernabe’s warehouse. So Tiongson files for a petition for a writ of attachment and the Court granted it. Bernabe’s properties were attached, including only 924 cavans of rice and 31 ½ kilos of palay. These were sold at a public auction and the proceeds were delivered to Tiongson.


Santos tried to intervene in the attachment of the palay but then the sheriff had already proceeded with the attachment, so Santos files a complaint. He says that Tiongson cannot claim the 924 cavans of palay; he says that by asking for the attachment of the properties, Tiongson is claiming that the cavans of rice all belonged to Bernabe and not to him.


ISSUE:

Whether or not Tiongson can claim the 924 cavans of rice as his own.


HELD:

No, both Tiongson and Santos must divide the cavans and palay proportionately.


The cavans belonging to Santos, having been mixed with those belonging to Tiongson, the following rule prescribed is Article 381 of the Civil Code: “If, by will of one of their owners, two things of identical or dissimilar nature are mixed, or if the mixture occurs accidentally, if in the latter case, the things cannot be separated without injury, each owner shall acquire a right in the mixture proportionate to the part belonging to him, according to the value of the things mixed or comingled.”


The number of kilos in a cavan not having been determined, the Court took the proportion only of the 924 cavans of palay which were attached andsold, therby giving Santos, who deposited 778 cavans, 398.49 and Tiongson, who deposited 1,026 cavans, 525.51, or the value thereof at the rate of 3Php per cavan.


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Modification of jud…

Sec. 7. Modification of judgment. – A judgment of conviction may, upon  motion  of  the  accused,  be  modified  or  set  aside  before  it becomes  final  or  before  appeal  is  perfected.  Except  where  the death penalty is imposed, a judgment be...

Read more

2010 BAR EXAMINATIO…

2010 BAR EXAMINATIONSLABOR AND SOCIAL LEGISLATION5 September 2010 2 P.M. – 5 P.M.PART IITRUE OR FALSE. Explain your answer briefly.1. Deeds of release, waivers and quitclaims are always valid and binding. (2%)2. The relations between employer and emp...

Read more

INSOLVENCY PROCEEDI…

INSOLVENCY PROCEEDINGS IN REM > Consequently, a liquidation of similar import or other equivalent general liquidation must also necessarily be a proceeding in remso that all interested persons whether known to the parties or notmay be bound by such ...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook