A+ A A-

LIM KIEH TONG V. CA- Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer

LIM KIEH TONG V. CA- Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer

Any person deprived of possession of any land or building may file an action for forcible entry and unlawful detainer against the person unlawfully depriving or withholding possession from him. This relief is not only available to landlord, lessor but to lessee and tenant as well within one year from such unlawful deprivation or withholding of possession.


FACTS:

Private Respondent and his family resided in room of a building owned by Petitioner until the former transferred to their new residence. However, Respondent retained possession of the room to keep his important belongings. At one point, when Respondent wanted to go to his room, he found that his key was no longer compatible with the door’s lock, that is, the lock was changed. He asked from Petitioner the new key but having failed, he filed a writ of preliminary mandatory injunction plus damages with the MTC. Petitioner countered that since the action is one for specific performance, the action should have been filed with the RTC.


ISSUE:

Whether or not the action is one for specific performance or forcible entry and detainer.


RULING:

The suit is actually one for forcible entry and detainer. Respondent remained in possession of the property but Petitioner prevented him from enjoying his right by depriving him of the right of egress and ingress through the door of the building and the room. Any person deprived of possession of any land or building may file an action for forcible entry and detainer against the person unlawfully depriving or withholding possession from him. This relief is not only avaible to landlord, lessor but to lessee and tenant as well within one year from such unlawful deprivation or withholding of possession.


LIM KIEH TONG V. CA- Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer

LIM KIEH TONG V. CA- Forcible Entry and Unlawful Detainer

Any person deprived of possession of any land or building may file an action for forcible entry and unlawful detainer against the person unlawfully depriving or withholding possession from him. This relief is not only available to landlord, lessor but to lessee and tenant as well within one year from such unlawful deprivation or withholding of possession.


FACTS:

Private Respondent and his family resided in room of a building owned by Petitioner until the former transferred to their new residence. However, Respondent retained possession of the room to keep his important belongings. At one point, when Respondent wanted to go to his room, he found that his key was no longer compatible with the door’s lock, that is, the lock was changed. He asked from Petitioner the new key but having failed, he filed a writ of preliminary mandatory injunction plus damages with the MTC. Petitioner countered that since the action is one for specific performance, the action should have been filed with the RTC.


ISSUE:

Whether or not the action is one for specific performance or forcible entry and detainer.


RULING:

The suit is actually one for forcible entry and detainer. Respondent remained in possession of the property but Petitioner prevented him from enjoying his right by depriving him of the right of egress and ingress through the door of the building and the room. Any person deprived of possession of any land or building may file an action for forcible entry and detainer against the person unlawfully depriving or withholding possession from him. This relief is not only avaible to landlord, lessor but to lessee and tenant as well within one year from such unlawful deprivation or withholding of possession.


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Effect of Affidavit…

Effect of Affidavit of DesistanceBautista v. Bernabe 482 SCRA 1 [2006] In administrative proceedings against lawyers, the complainant’s desistance or withdrawal is unavailing.

Read more

RIGHT OF PLEDGEE TO…

RIGHT OF PLEDGEE TO COMPENSATE EARNINGS OF PLEDGE WITH DEBT > The  pledgee  has  no  right  to  use  the  thing  pledged  or  to appropriate the  fruits thereof  without the  authority  of the owner > The  pledgee  can  apply  the  fruits,  income,  ...

Read more

HOW ARE CRIMINAL AC…

HOW ARE CRIMINAL ACTIONS INSTITUTED?1. For offenses where a preliminary investigation is required, by filing a complaint with the proper officer for the purpose of conducting the requisite preliminary investigation 2. For  the  other  offenses,  by  ...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook