A+ A A-

GENATO vs. DE LORENZO- Donation in a Public Document

The delivery by the donor and the acceptance by done must be simultaneous and the acceptance by a person other than the true done must be authorized by a proper power of attorney set forth in a public document


FACTS:

The property under dispute in this case is the 530 shares of stocks of Genato Commercal Corporation, which has P100 par value, of the deceased Simona B. De Genato (Director and secretary-treasurer of the said company). The petitioners herein, 2 heirs of Simona, are claiming that they own 530 shares of stocks of Genato Commercal Corporation because of the donation made by Simona to them.

Respondents (other remaining heirs), however, are trying to recover from the petitioners, their co-heirs, the said stocks so they can include it in the intestate estate which should later be distributed among all the surviving children of the decedent.


Four or five days after having Florentino Genato elected and designated as Assitant Secretary-Treasurer of the Corporation, 265 shares were issued in favour of Florentino Genato and another 265 were issued in favour of Francisco G. Genato. These were not presented as evidence in the course of the trial; they were merely mentioned by Florentino Genato in the course of his testimony as a witness.


ISSUE: Whether or not there was a valid donation?


RULING:

NO. There was no valid donation for lack of proper acceptance. Incontestably, one of the two donees was not present at the delivery, and there is no showing that Francisco Genato had authorized his brother, Florentino to accept for both of them. The delivery by the donor and the acceptance by done must be simultaneous and the acceptance by a person other than the true done must be authorized by a proper power of attorney set forth in a public document. None has been claimed to exist in this case.


GENATO vs. DE LORENZO- Donation in a Public Document


GENATO vs. DE LORENZO- Donation in a Public Document

The delivery by the donor and the acceptance by done must be simultaneous and the acceptance by a person other than the true done must be authorized by a proper power of attorney set forth in a public document


FACTS:

The property under dispute in this case is the 530 shares of stocks of Genato Commercal Corporation, which has P100 par value, of the deceased Simona B. De Genato (Director and secretary-treasurer of the said company). The petitioners herein, 2 heirs of Simona, are claiming that they own 530 shares of stocks of Genato Commercal Corporation because of the donation made by Simona to them.

Respondents (other remaining heirs), however, are trying to recover from the petitioners, their co-heirs, the said stocks so they can include it in the intestate estate which should later be distributed among all the surviving children of the decedent.


Four or five days after having Florentino Genato elected and designated as Assitant Secretary-Treasurer of the Corporation, 265 shares were issued in favour of Florentino Genato and another 265 were issued in favour of Francisco G. Genato. These were not presented as evidence in the course of the trial; they were merely mentioned by Florentino Genato in the course of his testimony as a witness.


ISSUE: Whether or not there was a valid donation?


RULING:

NO. There was no valid donation for lack of proper acceptance. Incontestably, one of the two donees was not present at the delivery, and there is no showing that Francisco Genato had authorized his brother, Florentino to accept for both of them. The delivery by the donor and the acceptance by done must be simultaneous and the acceptance by a person other than the true done must be authorized by a proper power of attorney set forth in a public document. None has been claimed to exist in this case.


GENATO vs. DE LORENZO- Donation in a Public Document


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

RIGHTS OF THE ACCUS…

RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED IN THE MATTER OF TESTIFYING OR PRODUCING EVIDENCE?> Before the case is filed in court but after he has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his liberty, the accused has the following rights— 1.    The  right  to  be ...

Read more

EXCEPTIONS TO THE B…

EXCEPTIONS TO THE BENEFITS OF EXCUSSION1.   If the guarantor has expressly renounced it;2.   If he has bound himself solidarily with the debtor;3.   In case of insolvency of the debtor;4.   When  he  has  absconded,  or  cannot  be  sued  within  the...

Read more

EXXONMOBIL PETROLEU…

EXXONMOBIL PETROLEUM AND CHEMICAL HOLDINGS, INC. – PHILIPPINE BRANCH VS. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEFACTS:Exxonmobil was a US corporation engaged in selling petroleum products to domestic and international carriers. It purchased petroleum produc...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook