A+ A A-

No Interest If There is no written agreement to pay it; exception

Liability For Interest Even Without Agreement

Is a person liable for interest even if there is no agreement? No as a rule, because no interest shall be due unless it has been expressly stipulated in writing. (Art. 1956, NCC).

             Be that as it may, while there can be no stipulated interest, there can be legal interest pursuant to Article 2209 of the Civil Code. It is well-settled:

             When the obligation is breached, and it consists in the payment of a sum of money, i.e., a loan or forbearance of money, the interest due should be that which may have been stipulated in writing. Furthermore, the interest due shall itself earn legal interest from the time it is judicially demanded. In the absence of stipulation, the rate of interest shall be 12% per annum to be computed from default, i.e., from judicial or extrajudicial demand under and subject to the provisions of Article 1169 of the Civil Code. (Eusebio-Calderon v. People, G.R. No. 158495, October 21, 2004, 441 SCRA 137; Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. 97412, July 12, 1994, 234 SCRA 78; Garcia v. Thio, G.R. No. 154878, March 16, 2007).

             Hence, the debtor is liable for the payment of legal interest per annum to be computed from the date when she received the demand letter. From the finality of the decision until it is fully paid, the amount due shall earn interest at 12% per annum, the interim period being deemed equivalent to a forbearance of credit. (Cabrera v. People, G.R. 150618, July 24, 2003, 407 SCRA 247; Garcia v. Rica Marie Thio, G.R. No. 154878, March 16, 2007).

 On the payment of interest, the 12% rate is applied only when the obligation breached consists in the payment of a sum of money, i.e., forbearance of money, in the absence of a stipulation. Otherwise the applicable rate is 6% per annum. Upon the finality of this ruling, the rate of interest shall be 12% per annum for the entire judgment, until its satisfaction. (United Planters Sugar Milling, Inc. v. CA, et al., G.R. No. 126890, November 28, 2006).


No Interest If There is no written agreement to pay it; exception

Liability For Interest Even Without Agreement

Is a person liable for interest even if there is no agreement? No as a rule, because no interest shall be due unless it has been expressly stipulated in writing. (Art. 1956, NCC).

             Be that as it may, while there can be no stipulated interest, there can be legal interest pursuant to Article 2209 of the Civil Code. It is well-settled:

             When the obligation is breached, and it consists in the payment of a sum of money, i.e., a loan or forbearance of money, the interest due should be that which may have been stipulated in writing. Furthermore, the interest due shall itself earn legal interest from the time it is judicially demanded. In the absence of stipulation, the rate of interest shall be 12% per annum to be computed from default, i.e., from judicial or extrajudicial demand under and subject to the provisions of Article 1169 of the Civil Code. (Eusebio-Calderon v. People, G.R. No. 158495, October 21, 2004, 441 SCRA 137; Eastern Shipping Lines, Inc. v. CA, G.R. No. 97412, July 12, 1994, 234 SCRA 78; Garcia v. Thio, G.R. No. 154878, March 16, 2007).

             Hence, the debtor is liable for the payment of legal interest per annum to be computed from the date when she received the demand letter. From the finality of the decision until it is fully paid, the amount due shall earn interest at 12% per annum, the interim period being deemed equivalent to a forbearance of credit. (Cabrera v. People, G.R. 150618, July 24, 2003, 407 SCRA 247; Garcia v. Rica Marie Thio, G.R. No. 154878, March 16, 2007).

 On the payment of interest, the 12% rate is applied only when the obligation breached consists in the payment of a sum of money, i.e., forbearance of money, in the absence of a stipulation. Otherwise the applicable rate is 6% per annum. Upon the finality of this ruling, the rate of interest shall be 12% per annum for the entire judgment, until its satisfaction. (United Planters Sugar Milling, Inc. v. CA, et al., G.R. No. 126890, November 28, 2006).


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Insurable Interest …

Differentiate insurable interest in life insurance and insurable interest in property insurance.   Insurable interest in life exists when there is reasonable ground founded on the relation of the parties, either pecuniary or contractual or by blood...

Read more

Civil Procedure Mem…

ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2007   Remedial Law SUMMER REVIEW   Civil Procedure Law Memory Aid Download the full text from the attachments area below.

Read more

TAN VS. SABANDAL, 1…

FACTS: Respondent Nicolas El. Sabandal passed the 1978 Bar Examinations but because of pending administrative complaints filed against him regarding instances when he called himself “attorney” knowing full well that he was not yet admitted to the Bar...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook