A+ A A-

Crimes In Violation of the Freedom of Religion.

Crimes In Violation of the Freedom of Religion.

 

ART. 132 Revised Penal Code.  Interruption of Religious Worship

 

I. Concept: The crime committed by any public officer or employee who shall prevent or disturb the manifestations or ceremonies of any religion.

 

II. Manifestation or ceremonies refer to the rituals or rites or practices such as the holding of a mass or religious service, baptisms and other sacraments or prayer meetings.

 

  A. They may be unorthodox such as crying, dancing, gyrating or with the use of props

B. They extend to all kinds of worships so long as these are not indecent or violative of laws or public morals 

 

III. The term any religion is broad enough to include not only the institutional religions, whether Christian or not 

 

ART. 133 Revised Penal Code- Offending Against Religious Feelings

 

I.. Concept or essence: the crime committed by any person- i.e. a public officer or a private person, who performs acts notoriously offensive to the feelings of the faithful which are committed either: (i) in a place dedicated to religious worship or (ii) during the celebration of any religious ceremony.

 

II. The act contemplated is one which ridicules or makes fun of a practice, tenet, dogma, or belief, otherwise the offense is unjust vexation. These may be oral  or written statements or actions. 

 

III. Whether the act is offensive is to be viewed from the members of the religious group involved    


Crimes In Violation of the Freedom of Religion.

Crimes In Violation of the Freedom of Religion.

 

ART. 132 Revised Penal Code.  Interruption of Religious Worship

 

I. Concept: The crime committed by any public officer or employee who shall prevent or disturb the manifestations or ceremonies of any religion.

 

II. Manifestation or ceremonies refer to the rituals or rites or practices such as the holding of a mass or religious service, baptisms and other sacraments or prayer meetings.

 

  A. They may be unorthodox such as crying, dancing, gyrating or with the use of props

B. They extend to all kinds of worships so long as these are not indecent or violative of laws or public morals 

 

III. The term any religion is broad enough to include not only the institutional religions, whether Christian or not 

 

ART. 133 Revised Penal Code- Offending Against Religious Feelings

 

I.. Concept or essence: the crime committed by any person- i.e. a public officer or a private person, who performs acts notoriously offensive to the feelings of the faithful which are committed either: (i) in a place dedicated to religious worship or (ii) during the celebration of any religious ceremony.

 

II. The act contemplated is one which ridicules or makes fun of a practice, tenet, dogma, or belief, otherwise the offense is unjust vexation. These may be oral  or written statements or actions. 

 

III. Whether the act is offensive is to be viewed from the members of the religious group involved    


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

VELASCO V. MANILA E…

VELASCO V. MANILA ELECTRIC40 SCRA 342FACTS:Velasco was the owner of 3 adjoining lots. He then sold two of these to Meralco who later constructed a substation. It was only separated from the house of petitioner by a wire fence.HELD:General rule is tha...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook