A+ A A-

CONCUBINAGE

CONCUBINAGE


I. How committed/Concept: The crime committed by a married man who:

1. Shall keep a mistress in the conjugal dwelling

a). the concubine must live in the conjugal dwelling even for brief periods of time, and not where she occasionally comes for a tryst or to spend the night therein


2. Shall have sexual intercourse with her under scandalous circumstances

a). Proof of sex is not necessary but may be inferred
b). There be a public or open flaunting of the illicit relationship so that the public is scandalized, shocked, or the conduct give rise to general protest, or that the relationship sets a bad example.
c). Example: being seen with the woman in social and public gatherings; introducing or treating the woman as though she were the wife   
d) Since public reaction is gauge of the scandal is there concubinage if:

   (i) openly going out is in places where the two are total strangers
   (ii) relatives and acquaintances accept the fact of the relationship, as when the wife left the man who now is cared and loved by another woman?


3. Cohabit with her in any other place

a). To cohabit is to live together as husband and wife.
b) QUESTION: Is concubinage committed by the man in providing the woman her own house or apartment but does not live with her though he regularly visits her thereat, at which time they engage in sex?    


II. Unlike in adultery, the fact of criminal conversation or sexual intercourse with a woman does not per se give rise to concubinage. Further, each sexual act is not a separate offense because concubinage is treated as a continuing crime.

Note:  In adultery the penalty is the same for both the woman and man (Prision correctional medium and maximum) but in concubinage the penalty for the man is lower by one degree ( prision correctional minimum and medium) while the  concubine is given a separate penalty which is destierro.

III. The woman is liable if she knows him to be married (even if unhappily at that and even if her purpose is to provide comfort and companionship)

IV. The defenses available in adultery also apply such as consent and pardon.


Related Philippine Law Resources:

CONCUBINAGE

CONCUBINAGE


I. How committed/Concept: The crime committed by a married man who:

1. Shall keep a mistress in the conjugal dwelling

a). the concubine must live in the conjugal dwelling even for brief periods of time, and not where she occasionally comes for a tryst or to spend the night therein


2. Shall have sexual intercourse with her under scandalous circumstances

a). Proof of sex is not necessary but may be inferred
b). There be a public or open flaunting of the illicit relationship so that the public is scandalized, shocked, or the conduct give rise to general protest, or that the relationship sets a bad example.
c). Example: being seen with the woman in social and public gatherings; introducing or treating the woman as though she were the wife   
d) Since public reaction is gauge of the scandal is there concubinage if:

   (i) openly going out is in places where the two are total strangers
   (ii) relatives and acquaintances accept the fact of the relationship, as when the wife left the man who now is cared and loved by another woman?


3. Cohabit with her in any other place

a). To cohabit is to live together as husband and wife.
b) QUESTION: Is concubinage committed by the man in providing the woman her own house or apartment but does not live with her though he regularly visits her thereat, at which time they engage in sex?    


II. Unlike in adultery, the fact of criminal conversation or sexual intercourse with a woman does not per se give rise to concubinage. Further, each sexual act is not a separate offense because concubinage is treated as a continuing crime.

Note:  In adultery the penalty is the same for both the woman and man (Prision correctional medium and maximum) but in concubinage the penalty for the man is lower by one degree ( prision correctional minimum and medium) while the  concubine is given a separate penalty which is destierro.

III. The woman is liable if she knows him to be married (even if unhappily at that and even if her purpose is to provide comfort and companionship)

IV. The defenses available in adultery also apply such as consent and pardon.


Related Philippine Law Resources:

BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

EFFECT OF PARDON BY…

AFTER THE CASE FOR A PRIVATE CRIME IS FILED IN COURT, WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF PARDON BY THE OFFENDED PARTY? > Will not have any effect on the prosecution of the offense > Once  a  complaint  has  been  filed  in  court,  jurisdiction  over  the offense...

Read more

ABUBAKAR V. AUDITOR…

ABUBAKAR V. AUDITOR GENERAL  81 PHIL. 359  FACTS: The  auditor  general  refuses  to  authorize  the  payment  of  the  treasury warrant  issued  in  the  name  of  Placido  Urbanes,  now  in  the  hands  of Benjamin  Abubakar.    The  auditor genera...

Read more

WHAT IS THE EFFECT …

WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF THE REFUSAL OF THE ACCUSED TO TESTIFY ON HIS BEHALF?>     GENERAL  RULE—the  silence  of  the  accused  should  not  prejudice him >     EXCEPTIONS—the  following  cases  draw  an  unfavorable  inference from the failure of the ...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook