A+ A A-

Exempting Circumstances

Exempting Circumstances


Art. 12.  Circumstances which exempt from criminal liability.

the following are exempt from criminal liability:


1. An imbecile or an insane

1. An imbecile or an insane person, unless the latter has acted during a lucid interval.


When the imbecile or an insane person has committed an act which the law defines as a felony (delito), the court shall order his confinement in one of the hospitals or asylums established for persons thus afflicted, which he shall not be permitted to leave without first obtaining the permission of the same court.


2. under nine years of age

2. A person under nine years of age.


R.A 9344 Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act :15 yrs old

3. A person over nine years of age and under fifteen, unless he has acted with discernment

3. A person over nine years of age and under fifteen, unless he has acted with discernment, in which case, such minor shall be proceeded against in accordance with the provisions of Art. 80 of this Code.


R.A 9344 Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act : above 15 but below 18 yrs old

When such minor is adjudged to be criminally irresponsible, the court, in conformably with the provisions of this and the preceding paragraph, shall commit him to the care and custody of his family who shall be charged with his surveillance and education otherwise, he shall be committed to the care of some institution or person mentioned in said Art. 80.


4. Accident

4. Any person who, while performing a lawful act with due care, causes an injury by mere accident without fault or intention of causing it.


  1. Person is performing a lawful act
  2. With due care
  3. E causes injury to another by mere accident
  4. Without fault or intention of causing it
    1. compulsion of irresistible force.


5. Any person who act under the compulsion of irresistible force.


  1. that the compulsion is by means of physical force
  2. that the physical force must be irresistable
  3. that the physical force must come from a third person


6. impulse of an uncontrollable fear

6. Any person who acts under the impulse of an uncontrollable fear of an equal or greater injury.


  1. That the threat which causes the fearis of an evil greater than, or at least equal to, that which h is required to commit
  2. That it promises an evil of such gravity and imminence that the ordinary man would have succumbed to it

7. insuperable cause.

7. Any person who fails to perform an act required by law, when prevented by some lawful insuperable cause.


  1. That an act is required by law to be done
  2. That a person fails to perform such act
  3. That his failure to perform such act is due to some lawful or insuperable cause



Related Philippine Law Resources:

Exempting Circumstances

Exempting Circumstances


Art. 12.  Circumstances which exempt from criminal liability.

the following are exempt from criminal liability:


1. An imbecile or an insane

1. An imbecile or an insane person, unless the latter has acted during a lucid interval.


When the imbecile or an insane person has committed an act which the law defines as a felony (delito), the court shall order his confinement in one of the hospitals or asylums established for persons thus afflicted, which he shall not be permitted to leave without first obtaining the permission of the same court.


2. under nine years of age

2. A person under nine years of age.


R.A 9344 Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act :15 yrs old

3. A person over nine years of age and under fifteen, unless he has acted with discernment

3. A person over nine years of age and under fifteen, unless he has acted with discernment, in which case, such minor shall be proceeded against in accordance with the provisions of Art. 80 of this Code.


R.A 9344 Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act : above 15 but below 18 yrs old

When such minor is adjudged to be criminally irresponsible, the court, in conformably with the provisions of this and the preceding paragraph, shall commit him to the care and custody of his family who shall be charged with his surveillance and education otherwise, he shall be committed to the care of some institution or person mentioned in said Art. 80.


4. Accident

4. Any person who, while performing a lawful act with due care, causes an injury by mere accident without fault or intention of causing it.


  1. Person is performing a lawful act
  2. With due care
  3. E causes injury to another by mere accident
  4. Without fault or intention of causing it
    1. compulsion of irresistible force.


5. Any person who act under the compulsion of irresistible force.


  1. that the compulsion is by means of physical force
  2. that the physical force must be irresistable
  3. that the physical force must come from a third person


6. impulse of an uncontrollable fear

6. Any person who acts under the impulse of an uncontrollable fear of an equal or greater injury.


  1. That the threat which causes the fearis of an evil greater than, or at least equal to, that which h is required to commit
  2. That it promises an evil of such gravity and imminence that the ordinary man would have succumbed to it

7. insuperable cause.

7. Any person who fails to perform an act required by law, when prevented by some lawful insuperable cause.


  1. That an act is required by law to be done
  2. That a person fails to perform such act
  3. That his failure to perform such act is due to some lawful or insuperable cause



Related Philippine Law Resources:

BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Enriquez v. SunLife…

Enriquez v. SunLife- Insurance Policy 41 PHIL 269 Facts: >  On Sept. 24 1917, Herrer made an application to SunLife through its office in Manila for life annuity. >  2 days later, he paid the sum of 6T to the company’s anager in its Manila of...

Read more

CAN THE OFFENDED PA…

CAN THE OFFENDED PARTY GO DIRECTLY TO COURT TO FILE A CRIMINAL ACTION?> No.  General rule is that before a complaint is filed in court, there should have been a confrontation between the parties before the Lupon  Chairman.    The  Lupon  secretary  s...

Read more

REPUBLIC V. COURT O…

REPUBLIC V. COURT OF APPEALS 281 SCRA 639     FACTS: Morato  has  filed  for  patent  over  a  parcel  of  land,  of  which  was  granted under the condition that he would not encumber it for a period of 5 years from  issuance  of  patent.    It  was...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook