
Mortgagor and Mortgagee Insuring The Same Property
Category: Law on Insurance
Mortgagor and Mortgagee Insuring The Same Property
Is it alright if both the mortgagor and the mortgagee insure the same property?
YES. The mortgagor and the mortgagee have each an insurable interest in the property mortgaged, and this interest is separate and distinct from the other. Consequently, insurance taken by one in his own name only and in his favor alone does not inure to the benefit of the other. And in case both of them take out separate insurance policies on the same property, or one policy covering their respective interests, the same is not open to the objection that there is double insurance.
What is the extent of the insurable interest of the mortgagor?
The mortgagor of the property, as owner has an insurable interest to the extent of the value of the property, even if the mortgage debt is equal to such value. The reason is that the loss or destruction of the property insured will NOT extinguish the mortgage debt.
What is the extent of the insurable interest of the mortgagee?
The mortgagee or his assignee has an insurable interest in the mortgaged property to the extent of the debt secured, such interest continues until the mortgage debt is extinguished.
Up to what extent can each recover?
The mortgagor cannot recover upon the insurance beyond the full amount of the loss, and the mortgagee cannot recover in excess of the credit at the time of the loss.
Under Sec. 8, what are the effects of insurance when the mortgagor effects insurance in his own name and provides that the loss be payable to the mortgagee?
The legal effects of this are:
(1) The contract is deemed to be upon the interest of the mortgagor, hence he does NOT cease to be a party to the contract;
(2) Any action of the mortgage prior to the loss which would otherwise avoid the insurance affects the mortgagee even if the property is in the hands of the mortgagee;
(3) Any act which under the contract of insurance is to be performed by the mortgagor, may be performed by the mortgagee;
(4) In case of loss, the mortgagee is entitled to the proceeds to the extent of his credit; and
(5) Upon recovery by the mortgagee to the extent of his credit, the debt is extinguished.
What is the effect if the mortgagee effects insurance on behalf of the mortgagor?
Practically the same rules apply. Upon the destruction of the property, then the mortgagee is entitled to receive the proceeds equal to the amount of the mortgage credit. Such payment operates to discharge the debt.
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
- Filipinas Cia de Seguros v. Christern Huenfeld & Co. - Enemy Corporation -
- Effect of war on the Existing Insurance Contracts Between the Philippines and a Citizen or Subject -
- Requisites in Order That a Person May Be Insured -
- Business of Insurance and Public Interest -
- What is an insurance corporation? -
Popular in BATASnatin:
Mortgagor and Mortgagee Insuring The Same Property
Category: Law on Insurance
Mortgagor and Mortgagee Insuring The Same Property
Is it alright if both the mortgagor and the mortgagee insure the same property?
YES. The mortgagor and the mortgagee have each an insurable interest in the property mortgaged, and this interest is separate and distinct from the other. Consequently, insurance taken by one in his own name only and in his favor alone does not inure to the benefit of the other. And in case both of them take out separate insurance policies on the same property, or one policy covering their respective interests, the same is not open to the objection that there is double insurance.
What is the extent of the insurable interest of the mortgagor?
The mortgagor of the property, as owner has an insurable interest to the extent of the value of the property, even if the mortgage debt is equal to such value. The reason is that the loss or destruction of the property insured will NOT extinguish the mortgage debt.
What is the extent of the insurable interest of the mortgagee?
The mortgagee or his assignee has an insurable interest in the mortgaged property to the extent of the debt secured, such interest continues until the mortgage debt is extinguished.
Up to what extent can each recover?
The mortgagor cannot recover upon the insurance beyond the full amount of the loss, and the mortgagee cannot recover in excess of the credit at the time of the loss.
Under Sec. 8, what are the effects of insurance when the mortgagor effects insurance in his own name and provides that the loss be payable to the mortgagee?
The legal effects of this are:
(1) The contract is deemed to be upon the interest of the mortgagor, hence he does NOT cease to be a party to the contract;
(2) Any action of the mortgage prior to the loss which would otherwise avoid the insurance affects the mortgagee even if the property is in the hands of the mortgagee;
(3) Any act which under the contract of insurance is to be performed by the mortgagor, may be performed by the mortgagee;
(4) In case of loss, the mortgagee is entitled to the proceeds to the extent of his credit; and
(5) Upon recovery by the mortgagee to the extent of his credit, the debt is extinguished.
What is the effect if the mortgagee effects insurance on behalf of the mortgagor?
Practically the same rules apply. Upon the destruction of the property, then the mortgagee is entitled to receive the proceeds equal to the amount of the mortgage credit. Such payment operates to discharge the debt.
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
- Filipinas Cia de Seguros v. Christern Huenfeld & Co. - Enemy Corporation -
- Effect of war on the Existing Insurance Contracts Between the Philippines and a Citizen or Subject -
- Requisites in Order That a Person May Be Insured -
- Business of Insurance and Public Interest -
- What is an insurance corporation? -
Popular in BATASnatin:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 6 days, 17 hours ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 3 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 3 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
PURPOSE OF PUBLICAT…
PURPOSE OF PUBLICATION IN LAND REGISTRATION1. To confer jurisdiction upon the court over the res2. To apprise the whole world of the pending registration case so that they may assert their rights or interests in the land, if any,and oppose the applic...
Read moreFOSSUM V. FERNANDEZ…
FOSSUM V. FERNANDEZ 44 PHIL 675 FACTS: Fernandez Hermanos placed an order with the products company for the manufacturing of a chain given a set of specifications. The chain was duly prepared and delivered. A draft was drawn by ...
Read moreR.A No. 9160 - Anti…
R.A No. 9160 - Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2001AN ACT DEFINING THE CRIME OF MONEY LAUNDERING, PROVIDING PENALTIES THEREFOR AND FOR OTHER PURPOSESSection 1. Short Title. – This Act shall be known as the "Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2001."Sec. 2. Dec...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

