A+ A A-

Presentment to partners, joint debtors, where debtor is dead

Presentment to partners, joint debtors, where debtor is dead

Sec. 76. Presentment  where principal debtor is  dead. - Where  the person  primarily  liable  on  the  instrument  is  dead  and  no  place  of payment  is  specified,  presentment  for  payment  must  be  made  to his  personal  representative,  if  such  there  be,  and  if,  with  the exercise of reasonable diligence, he can be found.
 
Sec.  77.  Presentment  to  persons  liable  as  partners.  -  Where  the persons  primarily  liable  on  the  instrument  are  liable  as  partners and  no  place  of  payment  is  specified,  presentment  for  payment
may  be  made  to  any  one  of  them,  even  though  there  has  been  a dissolution of the firm.
 
Sec.  78.  Presentment  to  joint  debtors.  -  Where  there  are  several persons,  not  partners,  primarily  liable  on  the  instrument  and  no place of payment is specified, presentment must be made to them
all.

 

SECTIONS 76 TO 78 NOT APPLICABLE WHERE PLACE SPECIFIED

•      Applies only where there is no place specified
 

WHERE PERSON PRIMARILY LIABLE DEAD

•      Presentment must be made to the executor or administrator if there is one and if he can be found
•      The  holder  must  use  diligence  to  find  the  personal  representative  if there be one
•      The person primarily liable is dead, there is a personal representative, and  no  place  of  payment  indicated  in  the  instrument—if  there  is  a place indicated, then presentment should be done there
 
WHERE  PERSONS  PRIMARILY  LIABLE  ARE  PARTNERS  THE  PRESENMENT MUST BE MADE TO ANY ONE OF THEM
 
WHERE PERSONS PRIMARILY LIABLE ARE JOINT DEBTORS, PRESENTMENT MUST BE MADE TO ALL OF THEM

Presentment to partners, joint debtors, where debtor is dead

Presentment to partners, joint debtors, where debtor is dead

Sec. 76. Presentment  where principal debtor is  dead. - Where  the person  primarily  liable  on  the  instrument  is  dead  and  no  place  of payment  is  specified,  presentment  for  payment  must  be  made  to his  personal  representative,  if  such  there  be,  and  if,  with  the exercise of reasonable diligence, he can be found.
 
Sec.  77.  Presentment  to  persons  liable  as  partners.  -  Where  the persons  primarily  liable  on  the  instrument  are  liable  as  partners and  no  place  of  payment  is  specified,  presentment  for  payment
may  be  made  to  any  one  of  them,  even  though  there  has  been  a dissolution of the firm.
 
Sec.  78.  Presentment  to  joint  debtors.  -  Where  there  are  several persons,  not  partners,  primarily  liable  on  the  instrument  and  no place of payment is specified, presentment must be made to them
all.

 

SECTIONS 76 TO 78 NOT APPLICABLE WHERE PLACE SPECIFIED

•      Applies only where there is no place specified
 

WHERE PERSON PRIMARILY LIABLE DEAD

•      Presentment must be made to the executor or administrator if there is one and if he can be found
•      The  holder  must  use  diligence  to  find  the  personal  representative  if there be one
•      The person primarily liable is dead, there is a personal representative, and  no  place  of  payment  indicated  in  the  instrument—if  there  is  a place indicated, then presentment should be done there
 
WHERE  PERSONS  PRIMARILY  LIABLE  ARE  PARTNERS  THE  PRESENMENT MUST BE MADE TO ANY ONE OF THEM
 
WHERE PERSONS PRIMARILY LIABLE ARE JOINT DEBTORS, PRESENTMENT MUST BE MADE TO ALL OF THEM

BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Crimes Against Popu…

Crimes Against Popular Representations   Crimes Against Legislative Bodies   1. Acts tending to prevent the meeting of Congress, constitutional commissions and local legislative bodies under Article 143.   A).The act punished is the prevention ...

Read more

Is there material a…

Is there material alteration when the serial number of a check had been altered?   No. An alteration is said to be material if it alters the effect of the instrument. It means an unauthorized change in an instrument that purports to modify in any r...

Read more

CHAMBER OF REAL EST…

Congress has the power to condition, limit or deny deductions from gross income in order to arrive at the net that it chooses to tax. This is because deductions are a matter of legislative grace. The assignment of gross income, instead of net income,...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook