Category: Law on Negotiable Instruments
Sec. 14. Blanks; when may be filled. - Where the instrument is wanting in any material particular, the person in possession thereof has a prima facie authority to complete it by filling up the blanks therein. And a signature on a blank paper delivered by the person making the signature in order that the paper may be converted into a negotiable instrument operates as a prima facie authority to fill it up as such for any amount. In order, however, that any such instrument when completed may be enforced against any person who became a party thereto prior to its completion, it must be filled up strictly in accordance with the authority given and within a reasonable time. But if any such instrument, after
completion, is negotiated to a holder in due course, it is valid and effectual for all purposes in his hands, and he may enforce it as if it had been filled up strictly in accordance with the authority given and within a reasonable time.
There are 2 steps in the execution of a negotiable instrument—
o The act of writing the instrument completely and in accordance with Section 1 of the Negotiable Instruments Law
o The delivery of the instrument with the intention of giving effect to it
1. A particular the omission of which will render the instrument non-negotiable
2. A particular the omission of which will not render the instrument non-negotiable
1. Want of a material particular in the instrument
2. Possession thereof by a person, a third fact
3. That such person had authority to fill up the blank
1. A signature on blank paper
2. That the person signing in blank delivers it in order that the paper may be converted into a negotiable instrument
1. The blank must be filled strictly in accordance with the authority given
2. It must be filled up within a reasonable time
First view: One who is not a holder in due course cannot enforce the instrument if the same is not filled up strictly in accordance with the authority given or within reasonable time
Second view: the holder can enforce the instrument accordance with the authorized tenor
According to Agbayani, the better view is the first view is the better view to have. The law provides that in order be one who is not a holder in due course may enforce mechanically incomplete but delivered instrument, the two requisites must exist. The implication is that one or both are not present, the instrument may not be enforced.
Regard is had to the nature of the instrument, the usage of trade or business with respect to such instrument and the facts of the particular case
Term is very relative
Defense available only to holders who are not holders in due course
1. Where the holder is a holder in due course, he can enforce the instrument as completed against parties prior or subsequent to the completion
2. Where the holder is not a holder in due course, he can enforce the instrument as completed as against the parties subsequent to the completion but not against those prior thereto