
Effects of Alteration of a Negotiable Instrument
Category: Law on Negotiable Instruments
Sec. 124. Alteration of instrument; effect of. - Where a negotiable instrument is materially altered without the assent of all parties liable thereon, it is avoided, except as against a party who has
himself made, authorized, or assented to the alteration and subsequent indorsers. But when an instrument has been materially altered and is in the hands of a holder in due course not a party to the alteration, he may enforce payment thereof according to its original tenor.
RIGHTS OF ONE NOT HOLDER IN DUE COURSE
• Where an instrument has been materially altered, it is avoided in the hands of one who is not a holder in due course as against a prior party who has not assented to the alteration
WHERE INSTRUMENT NOT AVOIDED AS TO HOLDER NOT IN DUE COURSE
1. A party who has made the material alteration
2. A party who has authorized the material alteration
3. A party who has assented to the material alteration
4. Any subsequent indorsers
RIGHTS OF HOLDER IN DUE COURSE
• He may enforce the instrument in its original tenor
• He could recover the altered tenor to any party who has made, authorized or assented the alteration, or any subsequent indorser of the instrument
NO DISTINCTION BETWEEN FRAUDULENT AND INNOCENT ALTERATION
RIGHT TO COLLECT ORIGINAL CONSIDERATION
• When the alteration wasn't fraudulently done, the holder may recover the original consideration
WHERE DRAWEE BANK PAYS ALTERED AMOUNT, DRAWER HAS THE RIGHT TO HAVE HIS ACCOUNT DEBITED WITH CORRECT AMOUNT ONLY
BANKS ARE BOUND BY THE 24-HOUR CLEARING HOUSE RULE AND MUST NOTIFY THE COLLECTING BANKS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ALTERATION OF CHECKS
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
Effects of Alteration of a Negotiable Instrument
Category: Law on Negotiable Instruments
Sec. 124. Alteration of instrument; effect of. - Where a negotiable instrument is materially altered without the assent of all parties liable thereon, it is avoided, except as against a party who has
himself made, authorized, or assented to the alteration and subsequent indorsers. But when an instrument has been materially altered and is in the hands of a holder in due course not a party to the alteration, he may enforce payment thereof according to its original tenor.
RIGHTS OF ONE NOT HOLDER IN DUE COURSE
• Where an instrument has been materially altered, it is avoided in the hands of one who is not a holder in due course as against a prior party who has not assented to the alteration
WHERE INSTRUMENT NOT AVOIDED AS TO HOLDER NOT IN DUE COURSE
1. A party who has made the material alteration
2. A party who has authorized the material alteration
3. A party who has assented to the material alteration
4. Any subsequent indorsers
RIGHTS OF HOLDER IN DUE COURSE
• He may enforce the instrument in its original tenor
• He could recover the altered tenor to any party who has made, authorized or assented the alteration, or any subsequent indorser of the instrument
NO DISTINCTION BETWEEN FRAUDULENT AND INNOCENT ALTERATION
RIGHT TO COLLECT ORIGINAL CONSIDERATION
• When the alteration wasn't fraudulently done, the holder may recover the original consideration
WHERE DRAWEE BANK PAYS ALTERED AMOUNT, DRAWER HAS THE RIGHT TO HAVE HIS ACCOUNT DEBITED WITH CORRECT AMOUNT ONLY
BANKS ARE BOUND BY THE 24-HOUR CLEARING HOUSE RULE AND MUST NOTIFY THE COLLECTING BANKS WITHIN 24 HOURS OF ALTERATION OF CHECKS
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 1 week ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
BALLATAN V. CA 304 …
BALLATAN V. CA 304 SCRA 34 FACTS: Petitioner constructed a house and found out that Go was encroaching on her land. A relocation survey was then conducted and it was found out that her total land area was decreased while the land of Ya...
Read moreINCIONG V. CA 257…
INCIONG V. CA 257 SCRA 578 FACTS: A promissory note was issued by petitioner together with 2 others jointly and severally, to make them liable to PBC. Thereafter was a default on the payment of the note. PBC proceeded against Inciong and in the ...
Read moreRequirements of an …
Requirements of an Insurance PolicySection 51. A policy of insurance must specify: (a) The parties between whom the contract is made; (b) The amount to be insured except in the cases of open or running policies; (c) The premium, or if the insuran...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

