
Right to bail or Recognizance
Category: Constitutional Law
RIGHT TO BAIL
Article 3, SECTION 13 Philippines Constitution
----- Right to bail or recognizance -----
People v. Nitcha
– murder; claim that arrest was illegal for want of preliminary investigation – Act of posting a bail bond,
apart from the fact that he entered a plea of not guilty, is tantamount to foregoing the right to question the assumed irregularity; Bail is a matter of right when the offense charged is punishable by any penalty lower than reclusion perpetua (absolute); Bail is a matter of discretion when the offense charged is punishable by reclusion perpetua; If accused ins convicted by the crime (reclusion perpetua), bail is neither a matter of right nor a matter of discretion. Bail must not be granted.
Cardines v. Rosete
– illegal recruitment – life imprisonment (special laws), reclusion perpetua (RPC), same standing with regard to bail – under the new rule, life imprisonment (not granted as a matter of right when evidence of guilt is strong.
People v. Sandiganbayan (Special Division)
– Jinggoy Estrada; not a flight risk
– Even if the capital offense charged is bailable owing to the weaknesses of the evidence of guilt, the right to bail can justifiably still be denied if the probability of escape is great; A grant of bail does not
prevent the trier of facts from making a final assessment of the evidence after full trial on the merits. A grant of bail is predicated only on its preliminary appreciation of the evidence adduced in the bail hearing to determine whether the deprivation of the right to bail is warranted.
Government of Hong Kong v. Olalia
– extradition; right to bail –If bail can be granted in deportation cases,, the Court sees no justification why it should not also be ed in extradition cases – clearly the right of a prospective extraditee to apply for bail must be viewed in light of the various treaty obligations of the Philippines concerning respect for the promotion and protection of human rights.
Rodriguez v. Presiding Judge, RTC Manila Br. 17
– when can the right to bail in extradition be available - Bail may be granted to a possible extraditee only upon a clear and convincing showing: 1) that he will not be a flight risk or a danger to the community and; 2) that there exist special, humanitarian and compelling circumstances.
----- Waiver of right -----
People v. Donato
– rebellion is a bailable offense; bail as a matter of right – Right to bail shall not be impaired even when the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is suspended; Prosecution does not have the right to present evidence for the denial of bail in the instances where bail is a matter of right, such is required only bail is discretionary;
Waiver of the right
1) the right exists;
2) voluntary relinquishment;
Right to bail may be waived.
----- Excessive bail -----
de la Camara v. Enage
– excessive bail – Where the right to bail exists, is should not be rendered nugatory by requiring a sum
that is so excessive;
Guidelines in fixing the bail:
1) ability of the accused to give bail;
2) nature of the offense;
3) penalty for the offense charged;
4) character and reputation of the accused;
5) health of the accused;
6) character and strength of evidence;
7) probability of the accused appearing in trial;
8) forfeiture of other bonds;
9) whether the accused was a fugitive from justice when arrested;
10) if the accused is under bond for appearance at trial in other cases.
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
Popular in BATASnatin:
- Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORY - - 18473 Hits
- The Powers Of The President Of The Philippines - - 6945 Hits
- 1987, 1973, 1935 Philippines Constitution Compared/ Comparison Matrix - - 6541 Hits
- NPC v. Ibrahim, et al., G.R. No. 168732, June 29, 2007- Eminent Domain - - 5691 Hits
- Fundamental Powers of the State - - 5473 Hits
Right to bail or Recognizance
Category: Constitutional Law
RIGHT TO BAIL
Article 3, SECTION 13 Philippines Constitution
----- Right to bail or recognizance -----
People v. Nitcha
– murder; claim that arrest was illegal for want of preliminary investigation – Act of posting a bail bond,
apart from the fact that he entered a plea of not guilty, is tantamount to foregoing the right to question the assumed irregularity; Bail is a matter of right when the offense charged is punishable by any penalty lower than reclusion perpetua (absolute); Bail is a matter of discretion when the offense charged is punishable by reclusion perpetua; If accused ins convicted by the crime (reclusion perpetua), bail is neither a matter of right nor a matter of discretion. Bail must not be granted.
Cardines v. Rosete
– illegal recruitment – life imprisonment (special laws), reclusion perpetua (RPC), same standing with regard to bail – under the new rule, life imprisonment (not granted as a matter of right when evidence of guilt is strong.
People v. Sandiganbayan (Special Division)
– Jinggoy Estrada; not a flight risk
– Even if the capital offense charged is bailable owing to the weaknesses of the evidence of guilt, the right to bail can justifiably still be denied if the probability of escape is great; A grant of bail does not
prevent the trier of facts from making a final assessment of the evidence after full trial on the merits. A grant of bail is predicated only on its preliminary appreciation of the evidence adduced in the bail hearing to determine whether the deprivation of the right to bail is warranted.
Government of Hong Kong v. Olalia
– extradition; right to bail –If bail can be granted in deportation cases,, the Court sees no justification why it should not also be ed in extradition cases – clearly the right of a prospective extraditee to apply for bail must be viewed in light of the various treaty obligations of the Philippines concerning respect for the promotion and protection of human rights.
Rodriguez v. Presiding Judge, RTC Manila Br. 17
– when can the right to bail in extradition be available - Bail may be granted to a possible extraditee only upon a clear and convincing showing: 1) that he will not be a flight risk or a danger to the community and; 2) that there exist special, humanitarian and compelling circumstances.
----- Waiver of right -----
People v. Donato
– rebellion is a bailable offense; bail as a matter of right – Right to bail shall not be impaired even when the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is suspended; Prosecution does not have the right to present evidence for the denial of bail in the instances where bail is a matter of right, such is required only bail is discretionary;
Waiver of the right
1) the right exists;
2) voluntary relinquishment;
Right to bail may be waived.
----- Excessive bail -----
de la Camara v. Enage
– excessive bail – Where the right to bail exists, is should not be rendered nugatory by requiring a sum
that is so excessive;
Guidelines in fixing the bail:
1) ability of the accused to give bail;
2) nature of the offense;
3) penalty for the offense charged;
4) character and reputation of the accused;
5) health of the accused;
6) character and strength of evidence;
7) probability of the accused appearing in trial;
8) forfeiture of other bonds;
9) whether the accused was a fugitive from justice when arrested;
10) if the accused is under bond for appearance at trial in other cases.
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
Popular in BATASnatin:
- Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORY - - 18473 Hits
- The Powers Of The President Of The Philippines - - 6945 Hits
- 1987, 1973, 1935 Philippines Constitution Compared/ Comparison Matrix - - 6541 Hits
- NPC v. Ibrahim, et al., G.R. No. 168732, June 29, 2007- Eminent Domain - - 5691 Hits
- Fundamental Powers of the State - - 5473 Hits
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 1 week ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
VOID, INEFFECTIVE O…
VOID, INEFFECTIVE OR UNPERFECTED DONATIONS1. Those not perfected in accordance with the forms and solemnities of the law2. Those made with property outside the commerce of man3. Those made with future property except those provided in marriage settle...
Read moreDoes a defective in…
The answer depends on whether or not there is a clear intent to participate in the management of the business affairs on the part of the investor. Parties who intends to participate or has actually participated in the business affairs of the proposed...
Read moreComment System Inte…
Now you can add comments to the articles- contribute by adding updates, useful comments or anything that can help in our pursuit in learning laws. You must be logged in to add a comment. Thank you!Admin
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

