
Republic v. Manila Electric Company, 391 SCRA 700 (2002)
Category: Constitutional Law
Republic v. Manila Electric Company
391 SCRA 700 (2002)
Regulation of rates to be charged by public utilities is founded upon the police power of the State and statutes prescribing rules for the control and regulation of public utilities are a valid exercise thereof. When private property is used for a public purpose and is affected with public interest, it ceases to be juris privati only becomes subject to regulation. Submission to regulation may be withdrawn by the owner by discontinuing use but as long as the use of the property is continued, the same is subject to public regulation. In regulating rates charged by public utilities, the State protects the public against arbitrary and excessive rates while maintaining the efficiency and quality of services rendered. However, the power to regulate rates does not give the State the right to prescribe rates which are so low as to deprive the public utility of a reasonable return on investment. Thus, the rates prescribed by the State must be one that yields a fair return omn public utility upon the value of the property performing the service and one that is reasonable to the public for the services rendered. The fixing of just and reasonable rates involves a balancing of the investor and the consumer interests.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
Popular in BATASnatin:
- Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORY - - 18473 Hits
- The Powers Of The President Of The Philippines - - 6946 Hits
- 1987, 1973, 1935 Philippines Constitution Compared/ Comparison Matrix - - 6541 Hits
- NPC v. Ibrahim, et al., G.R. No. 168732, June 29, 2007- Eminent Domain - - 5692 Hits
- Fundamental Powers of the State - - 5473 Hits
Republic v. Manila Electric Company, 391 SCRA 700 (2002)
Category: Constitutional Law
Republic v. Manila Electric Company
391 SCRA 700 (2002)
Regulation of rates to be charged by public utilities is founded upon the police power of the State and statutes prescribing rules for the control and regulation of public utilities are a valid exercise thereof. When private property is used for a public purpose and is affected with public interest, it ceases to be juris privati only becomes subject to regulation. Submission to regulation may be withdrawn by the owner by discontinuing use but as long as the use of the property is continued, the same is subject to public regulation. In regulating rates charged by public utilities, the State protects the public against arbitrary and excessive rates while maintaining the efficiency and quality of services rendered. However, the power to regulate rates does not give the State the right to prescribe rates which are so low as to deprive the public utility of a reasonable return on investment. Thus, the rates prescribed by the State must be one that yields a fair return omn public utility upon the value of the property performing the service and one that is reasonable to the public for the services rendered. The fixing of just and reasonable rates involves a balancing of the investor and the consumer interests.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
Popular in BATASnatin:
- Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORY - - 18473 Hits
- The Powers Of The President Of The Philippines - - 6946 Hits
- 1987, 1973, 1935 Philippines Constitution Compared/ Comparison Matrix - - 6541 Hits
- NPC v. Ibrahim, et al., G.R. No. 168732, June 29, 2007- Eminent Domain - - 5692 Hits
- Fundamental Powers of the State - - 5473 Hits
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 1 week ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
NOTICE OF INITIAL H…
NOTICE OF INITIAL HEARING IN LAND REGISTRATION PROCEEDINGS> The court must WITHIN 5 DAYS from the filing of application, shall issue an order setting the date and hour of the initial hearing which shall not be earlier than 45 days nor later than 90 d...
Read moreSureties and Solida…
The use of “SURETIES” 13 times does not sufficiently establish that the obligation is solidary in nature.The term “surety” has a specific meaning under the Civil Code. Article 2047 provides the statutory definition of a surety agreement, that by guar...
Read moreDOUBLE JEOPARDY
DOUBLE JEOPARDYTo substantiate a claim of double jeopardy, the following must be proven: a. The first jeopardy must have attached prior to the second b. The first jeopardy must have been validly terminated c. The second jeopardy must be for the sa...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

