A+ A A-

PROCEDURE IN THE KATARUNGAN PAMBARANGAY

WHAT IS THE  PROCEDURE IN THE KATARUNGAN PAMBARANGAY LAW?

1.    While  the  dispute  is  under  mediation  conciliation  or  arbitration, the  prescriptive  periods  for  offenses  and  cause  of  action  under existing laws shall be interrupted upon filing of the complaint with the Punong Barangay

2.    Prescriptive periods shall resume upon receipt by the complainant of  the  complaint  or  the  certificate  of  repudiation  or  of  the certification to file action filed by the Lupon or Pangkat secretary

3.    Provided however, that such interruption shall not exceed 60 days from the filing of the complaint with the Punong Barangay

WHAT ARE THE EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE?

1.    Where the accused is under detention

2.    Where  a  person  has  been  otherwise  deprived  of  personal  liberty calling for habeas corpus proceedings

3.    Where actions are coupled with provisional remedies

4.    Where the action may be barred by the statute of limitations 


PROCEDURE IN THE KATARUNGAN PAMBARANGAY

WHAT IS THE  PROCEDURE IN THE KATARUNGAN PAMBARANGAY LAW?

1.    While  the  dispute  is  under  mediation  conciliation  or  arbitration, the  prescriptive  periods  for  offenses  and  cause  of  action  under existing laws shall be interrupted upon filing of the complaint with the Punong Barangay

2.    Prescriptive periods shall resume upon receipt by the complainant of  the  complaint  or  the  certificate  of  repudiation  or  of  the certification to file action filed by the Lupon or Pangkat secretary

3.    Provided however, that such interruption shall not exceed 60 days from the filing of the complaint with the Punong Barangay

WHAT ARE THE EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE?

1.    Where the accused is under detention

2.    Where  a  person  has  been  otherwise  deprived  of  personal  liberty calling for habeas corpus proceedings

3.    Where actions are coupled with provisional remedies

4.    Where the action may be barred by the statute of limitations 


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

THE WAREHOUSE RECEI…

THE WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS LAW WHO MAY ISSUE WAREHOUSE RECEIPT? > A warehouseman is  a  person  lawfully  engaged  in  the business of storing goods for profit. > Only a warehouseman may issue warehouse receipts  WHAT SHOULD BE DONE TO PUT THE RECEIPT WI...

Read more

VDA. DE BALTAZAR V.…

VDA. DE BALTAZAR V. COURT OF APPEALS- Easement of Right of WayFor someone to be entitled of an easement of right of way, 4 requisites must be present: (1) the estate must be surrounded by other immovables and is without adequate outlet to a public hi...

Read more

Tuazon v. Heirs of …

Phebean, the drawer issued a check to James. James, subsequently indorsed it to Trude. When Trude is about to encash the check, the drawee Union Bank refused to encash it due to insufficiency of funds. Trude sued James for payment of money. James all...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook