
Who Must Prosecute Criminal Actions
Category: Criminal Procedure
Who Must Prosecute Criminal Actions
Sec. 5. Who must prosecute criminal actions. – All criminal actions commenced by a complaint or information shall be prosecuted under the direction and control of the prosecutor. However, in Municipal Trial Courts or Municipal Circuit Trial Courts when the prosecutor assigned thereto or to the case is not available, the offended party, any peace officer, or public officer charged with the enforcement of the law violated may prosecute the case. This authority shall cease upon actual intervention of the prosecutor or upon elevation of the case to the Regional Trial Court.(Read A.M.
NO. 02-2-07-SC [Effective May 01, 2002]
Latest Amendments to Section 5, Rule 110 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure which provides: "Section 5. Who must prosecute criminal action. - All criminal actions either commenced by complaint or by information shall be prosecuted under the direction and control of a public prosecutor. In case of heavy work schedule of the public prosecutor or in the event of lack of public prosecutors, the private prosecutor may be authorized in writing by the Chief of the Prosecution Office or the Regional State Prosecutor to prosecute the case subject to the approval of the court. Once so
authorized to prosecute the criminal action, the private prosecutor shall continue to prosecute the case up to end of the trial even in the absence of a public prosecutor, unless the authority is revoked or otherwise withdrawn. x x x .").
The crimes of adultery and concubinage shall not be prosecuted except upon a complaint filed by the offended spouse. The offended party cannot institute criminal prosecution without including the guilty parties, if both are alive, nor, in any case, if the offended party has consented to the offense or pardoned the offenders.
The offenses of seduction, abduction and acts of lasciviousness shall not be prosecuted upon a complaint filed by the offended party or her parents, grandparents or guardian, nor, in any case, if the offender has been expressly pardoned by any of them. If the offended party dies or becomes incapacitated before she can file the complaint, and she has no known parents, grandparents or guardian, the State shall initiate the criminal action in her behalf.
The offended party, even if a minor, has the right to initiate the prosecution of the offenses of seduction, abduction and acts of lasciviousness independently of her parents, grandparents, or guardian, unless she is incompetent or incapable of doing so. Where the offended party, who is a minor, fails to file the complaint, her parents, grandparents, or guardian may file the
same. The right to file the action granted to parents, grandparents, or guardian shall be exclusive of all other persons and shall be exercised successively in the order herein provided, except as stated in the preceding paragraph.
No criminal action for defamation which consists in the imputation of any of the offenses mentioned above shall be brought except at he instance of and upon complaint filed by the offended party.
The prosecution for violation of special laws shall be governed by the provision thereof.
WHO MAY PROSECUTE CRIMINAL ACTIONS?
> General rule: all criminal actions commenced by the filing of a complaint or information shall be prosecuted under the direction and control of the prosecutor
> In the MTC or MCTC, if the prosecutor is unavailable, the offended party, any peace officer or public officer in charge with the enforcement of the law violated may prosecute. This authority ceases upon actual intervention of the prosecutor or upon elevation of the case to the RTC.
CAN A PROSECUTOR BE COMPELLED TO FILE A PARTICULAR COMPLAINT OR INFORMATION?
> No
> A prosecutor is under no compulsion to file a particular criminal information where he is not convinced that he has evidence to support his allegations thereof
> May generally be not compelled by mandamus except if the prosecutor shows evident bias in filing the information and refuses to include co-accused without justification
> But before filing of mandamus, the party must first avail himself of such other remedies such as the filing of a motion for inclusion
> The power of prosecution is discretionary in nature
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
- DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE CONTROL BY THE PROSECUTION AND CONTROL BY THE COURT -
- IF THE PROSECUTOR THINKS AFTER FILING A CASE, THAT A PRIMA FACIE CASE DOES NOT EXIST, CAN HE REFUSE -
- AFTER A CASE IS FILED IN COURT, TO WHOM SHOULD A MOTION TO DISMISS BE ADDRESSED? -
- IS THE PROSECUTOR REQUIRED TO BE PHYSICALLY PRESENT IN THE TRIAL OF A CRIMINAL CASE? -
- TO WHOM SHOULD ONE APPEAL A DECISION OF THE PROSECUTOR? -
Additional Law Reading:
Who Must Prosecute Criminal Actions
Category: Criminal Procedure
Who Must Prosecute Criminal Actions
Sec. 5. Who must prosecute criminal actions. – All criminal actions commenced by a complaint or information shall be prosecuted under the direction and control of the prosecutor. However, in Municipal Trial Courts or Municipal Circuit Trial Courts when the prosecutor assigned thereto or to the case is not available, the offended party, any peace officer, or public officer charged with the enforcement of the law violated may prosecute the case. This authority shall cease upon actual intervention of the prosecutor or upon elevation of the case to the Regional Trial Court.(Read A.M.
NO. 02-2-07-SC [Effective May 01, 2002]
Latest Amendments to Section 5, Rule 110 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure which provides: "Section 5. Who must prosecute criminal action. - All criminal actions either commenced by complaint or by information shall be prosecuted under the direction and control of a public prosecutor. In case of heavy work schedule of the public prosecutor or in the event of lack of public prosecutors, the private prosecutor may be authorized in writing by the Chief of the Prosecution Office or the Regional State Prosecutor to prosecute the case subject to the approval of the court. Once so
authorized to prosecute the criminal action, the private prosecutor shall continue to prosecute the case up to end of the trial even in the absence of a public prosecutor, unless the authority is revoked or otherwise withdrawn. x x x .").
The crimes of adultery and concubinage shall not be prosecuted except upon a complaint filed by the offended spouse. The offended party cannot institute criminal prosecution without including the guilty parties, if both are alive, nor, in any case, if the offended party has consented to the offense or pardoned the offenders.
The offenses of seduction, abduction and acts of lasciviousness shall not be prosecuted upon a complaint filed by the offended party or her parents, grandparents or guardian, nor, in any case, if the offender has been expressly pardoned by any of them. If the offended party dies or becomes incapacitated before she can file the complaint, and she has no known parents, grandparents or guardian, the State shall initiate the criminal action in her behalf.
The offended party, even if a minor, has the right to initiate the prosecution of the offenses of seduction, abduction and acts of lasciviousness independently of her parents, grandparents, or guardian, unless she is incompetent or incapable of doing so. Where the offended party, who is a minor, fails to file the complaint, her parents, grandparents, or guardian may file the
same. The right to file the action granted to parents, grandparents, or guardian shall be exclusive of all other persons and shall be exercised successively in the order herein provided, except as stated in the preceding paragraph.
No criminal action for defamation which consists in the imputation of any of the offenses mentioned above shall be brought except at he instance of and upon complaint filed by the offended party.
The prosecution for violation of special laws shall be governed by the provision thereof.
WHO MAY PROSECUTE CRIMINAL ACTIONS?
> General rule: all criminal actions commenced by the filing of a complaint or information shall be prosecuted under the direction and control of the prosecutor
> In the MTC or MCTC, if the prosecutor is unavailable, the offended party, any peace officer or public officer in charge with the enforcement of the law violated may prosecute. This authority ceases upon actual intervention of the prosecutor or upon elevation of the case to the RTC.
CAN A PROSECUTOR BE COMPELLED TO FILE A PARTICULAR COMPLAINT OR INFORMATION?
> No
> A prosecutor is under no compulsion to file a particular criminal information where he is not convinced that he has evidence to support his allegations thereof
> May generally be not compelled by mandamus except if the prosecutor shows evident bias in filing the information and refuses to include co-accused without justification
> But before filing of mandamus, the party must first avail himself of such other remedies such as the filing of a motion for inclusion
> The power of prosecution is discretionary in nature
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
- DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE CONTROL BY THE PROSECUTION AND CONTROL BY THE COURT -
- IF THE PROSECUTOR THINKS AFTER FILING A CASE, THAT A PRIMA FACIE CASE DOES NOT EXIST, CAN HE REFUSE -
- AFTER A CASE IS FILED IN COURT, TO WHOM SHOULD A MOTION TO DISMISS BE ADDRESSED? -
- IS THE PROSECUTOR REQUIRED TO BE PHYSICALLY PRESENT IN THE TRIAL OF A CRIMINAL CASE? -
- TO WHOM SHOULD ONE APPEAL A DECISION OF THE PROSECUTOR? -
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 1 week ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
CIR vs. KUDOS METAL…
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE vs. KUDOS METAL CORPORATION- Waiver of the Statute of LimitationsFACTS:CIR assessed Kudos Metal Corporation for taxable year 1998. A Waiver of the Statute of Limitations was executed on December 2001. The CTA issued a...
Read moreAboitiz Shipping Co…
Is the victim’s presence in a vessel after 1 hour from his disembarkation was no longer reasonable and he consequently ceased to be a passenger? No. Carrier-‐passenger relationship continues until the passenger has been landed at the port of des...
Read moreEXTINGUISHMENT OF …
EXTINGUISHMENT OF PLEDGE BY RETURN OF THE THING PLEDGEDArt. 2110. If the thing pledged is returned by the pledgee to the pledgor or owner, the pledge is extinguished. Any stipulation to the contrary shall be void. If subsequent to the...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

