RULE ON SUPERVENING FACTS
Category: Criminal Procedure
RULE ON SUPERVENING FACTS
Where after the first prosecution a new fact supervenes for which the defendant is responsible, which changes the character of the offense and, together with the facts existing at the time, constitutes a new and distinct offense, the accused cannot be said to be in second jeopardy if indicted for the second offense.
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
- WHAT IS A TRANSITORY OFFENSE AND A CONTINUING OFFENSE? -
- WHERE SHOULD A CRIMINAL ACTION BE INSTITUTED? -
- Place Where Criminal Action Is To Be Instituted -
- IS THERE AN ABSOLUTE RIGHT TO SUBSTITUTION INFORMATION BY FILING A NEW ONE? -
- WHY DO WE MAKE A DISTINCTION BETWEEN A SUBSTANTIAL AND FORMAL AMENDMENTS? -
Additional Law Reading:
RULE ON SUPERVENING FACTS
Category: Criminal Procedure
RULE ON SUPERVENING FACTS
Where after the first prosecution a new fact supervenes for which the defendant is responsible, which changes the character of the offense and, together with the facts existing at the time, constitutes a new and distinct offense, the accused cannot be said to be in second jeopardy if indicted for the second offense.
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
- WHAT IS A TRANSITORY OFFENSE AND A CONTINUING OFFENSE? -
- WHERE SHOULD A CRIMINAL ACTION BE INSTITUTED? -
- Place Where Criminal Action Is To Be Instituted -
- IS THERE AN ABSOLUTE RIGHT TO SUBSTITUTION INFORMATION BY FILING A NEW ONE? -
- WHY DO WE MAKE A DISTINCTION BETWEEN A SUBSTANTIAL AND FORMAL AMENDMENTS? -
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 1 week ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
DEL MONTE VS. SUNSH…
DEL MONTE V. SUNSHINE SAUCE- Infringement of Trademark and Unfair CompetitionIn making the comparison to determine similarity, the question is NOT whether the two articles are distinguishable by their label when set side by side but whether the gener...
Read morePEOPLE V ARBALATE- …
PEOPLE V ARBALATE- Self DefenseFacts of the case:On July 7, 2002, around 3:00 pm, Gualberto Selemen, Jose Ragasa and Ruperto Arbalate drank alcohol at Selemen’s home at Samar. Two hours into the drinking, good-natured teasing turned into an altercati...
Read moreSue and Labor Claus…
Sue and labor clause – a clause under which the insurer may become liable to pay the insured in addition to the loss actually suffered, such expenses as he may have incurred in his efforts to protect the property against a peril for which the insurer...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more