Category: Criminal Procedure
Sec. 5. Judgment in civil action not a bar. – A final judgment rendered in a civil action absolving the defendant from civil liability is not a bar to a criminal action against the defendant for the same act or omission subject of the civil action.
> Yes, while every person criminally liable is also civilly liable, the converse is not true
> Therefore, even if the defendant is absolved of civil liability in a civil action, a criminal action can still be filed against him.
> The outcome of the civil action is not in anyway determinative of the guilt or innocence of the respondent in the civil case
> Besides, the state is a party in a criminal action, while only the private offended party is a party in a civil action
> Moreover, the quantum of evidence in the civil action is only preponderance of evidence while that required in the criminal action is proof beyond reasonable doubt
> No because interest of the offended party is only civil
> Any time he institutes the 3 actions, he cannot anymore intervene in the criminal action
> The interest of the state is criminal prosecution of the accused
Category: Criminal Procedure
Sec. 5. Judgment in civil action not a bar. – A final judgment rendered in a civil action absolving the defendant from civil liability is not a bar to a criminal action against the defendant for the same act or omission subject of the civil action.
> Yes, while every person criminally liable is also civilly liable, the converse is not true
> Therefore, even if the defendant is absolved of civil liability in a civil action, a criminal action can still be filed against him.
> The outcome of the civil action is not in anyway determinative of the guilt or innocence of the respondent in the civil case
> Besides, the state is a party in a criminal action, while only the private offended party is a party in a civil action
> Moreover, the quantum of evidence in the civil action is only preponderance of evidence while that required in the criminal action is proof beyond reasonable doubt
> No because interest of the offended party is only civil
> Any time he institutes the 3 actions, he cannot anymore intervene in the criminal action
> The interest of the state is criminal prosecution of the accused