
RULE 112 - PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
Category: Criminal Procedure
RULE 112 - PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
Section 1. Preliminary investigation defined; when required. – Preliminary investigation is an inquiry or proceeding to determine whether there is sufficient ground to engender a well-founded belief that a crime has been committed and the respondent is probably guilty thereof, and should be held for trial.
Except as provided in Section 7 of this Rule, a preliminary investigation is required to be conducted before the filing of a compliant or information for an offense where the penalty prescribed by law is at least four (4) years, two (2) months and one (1) day without regard to the fine.
WHAT IS A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION?
> It is an inquiry or proceeding to determine whether there is sufficient ground to engender a well-founded belief that a crime has been committed and the respondent is probably guilty
thereof, and should be held for trial
WHAT IS THE NATURE AND EFFECTS OF A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION?
1. It is merely inquisitorial
2. Only means of discovering whether the offense has been committed and the persons responsible for it
3. To enable the fiscal to prepare his complaint and information
4. Not a trial on the merits
5. Determine whether there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed and the accused is probably guilty of it
6. Doesn't place the accused in jeopardy
7. Doesn't affect the jurisdiction of the court—only the regularity of the proceedings
8. Accused cannot assert lack of preliminary investigation. Court cannot dismiss the case based on this ground—it should conduct the investigation or order the fiscal or lower court to do it
9. Preliminary investigation may be waived
10. Accused should invoke right to PI before plea, otherwise it is deemed waived
11. Accused doesn't have full gamut of rights yet. He doesn't have right to counsel unless a confession is being obtained from him.
12. There is also no right to confront witnesses against him.
WHEN IS IT REQUIRED?
> Before a complaint or information is filed, preliminary investigation is required for all offenses punishable by imprisonment of at least 4 years, 2 months and 1 day, regardless of the fine, except if the accused was arrested by virtue of a lawful arrest without warrant
> In case of lawful arrest without warrant: the complaint or information may be filed without a preliminary investigation unless the accused asks for a preliminary investigation and waives his rights under Article 125 of the RPC
> Whether or not there is a need for PI depends upon the imposable penalty for the crime charged in the complaint filed with the city or provincial prosecutor’s office and not upon the imposable penalty for the crime fund to have been committed by the respondent after a preliminary investigation
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
RULE 112 - PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
Category: Criminal Procedure
RULE 112 - PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION
Section 1. Preliminary investigation defined; when required. – Preliminary investigation is an inquiry or proceeding to determine whether there is sufficient ground to engender a well-founded belief that a crime has been committed and the respondent is probably guilty thereof, and should be held for trial.
Except as provided in Section 7 of this Rule, a preliminary investigation is required to be conducted before the filing of a compliant or information for an offense where the penalty prescribed by law is at least four (4) years, two (2) months and one (1) day without regard to the fine.
WHAT IS A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION?
> It is an inquiry or proceeding to determine whether there is sufficient ground to engender a well-founded belief that a crime has been committed and the respondent is probably guilty
thereof, and should be held for trial
WHAT IS THE NATURE AND EFFECTS OF A PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION?
1. It is merely inquisitorial
2. Only means of discovering whether the offense has been committed and the persons responsible for it
3. To enable the fiscal to prepare his complaint and information
4. Not a trial on the merits
5. Determine whether there is probable cause to believe that an offense has been committed and the accused is probably guilty of it
6. Doesn't place the accused in jeopardy
7. Doesn't affect the jurisdiction of the court—only the regularity of the proceedings
8. Accused cannot assert lack of preliminary investigation. Court cannot dismiss the case based on this ground—it should conduct the investigation or order the fiscal or lower court to do it
9. Preliminary investigation may be waived
10. Accused should invoke right to PI before plea, otherwise it is deemed waived
11. Accused doesn't have full gamut of rights yet. He doesn't have right to counsel unless a confession is being obtained from him.
12. There is also no right to confront witnesses against him.
WHEN IS IT REQUIRED?
> Before a complaint or information is filed, preliminary investigation is required for all offenses punishable by imprisonment of at least 4 years, 2 months and 1 day, regardless of the fine, except if the accused was arrested by virtue of a lawful arrest without warrant
> In case of lawful arrest without warrant: the complaint or information may be filed without a preliminary investigation unless the accused asks for a preliminary investigation and waives his rights under Article 125 of the RPC
> Whether or not there is a need for PI depends upon the imposable penalty for the crime charged in the complaint filed with the city or provincial prosecutor’s office and not upon the imposable penalty for the crime fund to have been committed by the respondent after a preliminary investigation
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 1 week ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
No right to lease w…
No right to lease while there is an existing lease contractThe rule is that, when there is a lease contract, the lessor is obliged to maintain the lessee in the peaceful and adequate enjoyment of the lease for the entire duration of the contract. (Ar...
Read moreCONDITIONS / REQUIS…
WHAT ARE THE REQUISITES IN ORDER FOR A PERSON TO BE DISCHARGED AS A STATE WITNESS? 1. The discharge must be WITH THE CONSENT OF THE ACCUSED sought to be a state witness 2. There is ABSOLUTE NECESSITY for the testimony of the...
Read moreRepublic Act No. 70…
Republic Act No. 7042 - Foreign Investment Act of 1991AN ACT TO PROMOTE FOREIGN INVESTMENTS, PRESCRIBE THE PROCEDURES FOR REGISTERING ENTERPRISES DOING BUSINESS IN THE PHILIPPINES AND FOR OTHER PURPOSESSECTION 1. Title. - This Act shall be known as t...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

