A+ A A-

WHEN IS AN ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT LAWFUL?

WHEN IS AN ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT LAWFUL?

> A peace officer or private person may arrest without warrant:

1.    When,  in  his  presence,  the  person  to  be  arrested  has committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense;

2.    When  an  offense  has  just  been  committed  and  he  has probable  cause  to  believe  based  on  personal  knowledge  of facts  or  circumstances  that  the  person  to  be  arrested  has committed it; and

3.    When  the  person  to  be  arrested  is  a  prisoner  who  has escaped  from  a  penal  establishment  or  place  where  he  is serving  final  judgment  or  is  temporarily  confined  while  his case is pending, or has escaped while being transferred from one confinement to another.

4.    In hot pursuit

A  POLICE  OFFICER  WAS  CHASING  A  PERSON  WHO  HAD  JUST COMMITTED  AN  OFFENSE.    THE  PERSON  WENT  INSIDE  A  HOUSE, SO  THE  POLICE  OFFICER  FOLLOWED.    INSIDE  THE  HOUSE,  THE POLICE   OFFICER   SAW   DRUGS   LYING   AROUND. CAN  HE CONFISCATE THE DRUGS AND USE THEM AS EVIDENCE?

> Yes.    The  plain  view  doctrine  is  applicable  to  this  case  because there was a valid prior intrusion.  The police officer inadvertently discovered  the  evidence,  he  had  a  right  to  be  there,  and  the evidence was immediately apparent.

WHAT IF THE OFFICER MERELY PEEKS THROUGH THE WINDOW OF THE HOUSE AND SEES THE DRUGS, CAN HE CONFISCATE THEM AND USE THEM AS EVIDENCE?

> He can confiscate them, without prejudice though to his liability for violation of domicile.
> He cannot use them as evidence because the seizure cannot be justified  under  the  plain  view  doctrine,  there  being  no  previous valid intrusion.

WHAT IS THE EFFECT IF A WARRANTLESS ARREST IS ILLEGAL?

> It  doesn't  render  void  all  other  proceedings,  including  those leading to the conviction of the accused nor can the state deprived of its right to convict the guilty when all the facts of record point
to his culpability 

Sec. 5. Arrest without warrant; when lawful. – A peace officer or a private person may, without a warrant, arrest a person:

(a)   When,   in   his   presence,   the   person   to   be   arrested   has committed,  is  actually  committing,  or  is  attempting  to  commit  an offense;

(b) When an offense has just been committed and he has probable cause   to   believe   based   on   personal   knowledge   of   facts   or circumstances that the person to be arrested has committed it; and

(c) When the person to be arrested is a prisoner who has escaped from  a  penal  establishment  or  place  where  he  is  serving  final judgment  or  is  temporarily  confined  while  his  case  is  pending,  or has  escaped  while  being  transferred  from  one  confinement  to another.

In  cases  falling  under  paragraphs  (a)  and  (b)  above,  the  person arrested  without  a  warrant  shall  be  forthwith  delivered  to  the nearest  police  station  or  jail  and  shall  be  proceeded  against  in accordance with section 7 of Rule 112.


WHEN IS AN ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT LAWFUL?

WHEN IS AN ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT LAWFUL?

> A peace officer or private person may arrest without warrant:

1.    When,  in  his  presence,  the  person  to  be  arrested  has committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense;

2.    When  an  offense  has  just  been  committed  and  he  has probable  cause  to  believe  based  on  personal  knowledge  of facts  or  circumstances  that  the  person  to  be  arrested  has committed it; and

3.    When  the  person  to  be  arrested  is  a  prisoner  who  has escaped  from  a  penal  establishment  or  place  where  he  is serving  final  judgment  or  is  temporarily  confined  while  his case is pending, or has escaped while being transferred from one confinement to another.

4.    In hot pursuit

A  POLICE  OFFICER  WAS  CHASING  A  PERSON  WHO  HAD  JUST COMMITTED  AN  OFFENSE.    THE  PERSON  WENT  INSIDE  A  HOUSE, SO  THE  POLICE  OFFICER  FOLLOWED.    INSIDE  THE  HOUSE,  THE POLICE   OFFICER   SAW   DRUGS   LYING   AROUND. CAN  HE CONFISCATE THE DRUGS AND USE THEM AS EVIDENCE?

> Yes.    The  plain  view  doctrine  is  applicable  to  this  case  because there was a valid prior intrusion.  The police officer inadvertently discovered  the  evidence,  he  had  a  right  to  be  there,  and  the evidence was immediately apparent.

WHAT IF THE OFFICER MERELY PEEKS THROUGH THE WINDOW OF THE HOUSE AND SEES THE DRUGS, CAN HE CONFISCATE THEM AND USE THEM AS EVIDENCE?

> He can confiscate them, without prejudice though to his liability for violation of domicile.
> He cannot use them as evidence because the seizure cannot be justified  under  the  plain  view  doctrine,  there  being  no  previous valid intrusion.

WHAT IS THE EFFECT IF A WARRANTLESS ARREST IS ILLEGAL?

> It  doesn't  render  void  all  other  proceedings,  including  those leading to the conviction of the accused nor can the state deprived of its right to convict the guilty when all the facts of record point
to his culpability 

Sec. 5. Arrest without warrant; when lawful. – A peace officer or a private person may, without a warrant, arrest a person:

(a)   When,   in   his   presence,   the   person   to   be   arrested   has committed,  is  actually  committing,  or  is  attempting  to  commit  an offense;

(b) When an offense has just been committed and he has probable cause   to   believe   based   on   personal   knowledge   of   facts   or circumstances that the person to be arrested has committed it; and

(c) When the person to be arrested is a prisoner who has escaped from  a  penal  establishment  or  place  where  he  is  serving  final judgment  or  is  temporarily  confined  while  his  case  is  pending,  or has  escaped  while  being  transferred  from  one  confinement  to another.

In  cases  falling  under  paragraphs  (a)  and  (b)  above,  the  person arrested  without  a  warrant  shall  be  forthwith  delivered  to  the nearest  police  station  or  jail  and  shall  be  proceeded  against  in accordance with section 7 of Rule 112.


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SOLIDBANK CORPORAT…

SOLIDBANK  CORPORATION  V.  MINDANAO  FERROALLOY CORPORATION GR 153535, JULY 28, 2005  FACTS: Mindanao  Ferroalloy  corporation  is  the  fruit  of  a  joint  venture  agreement between a Filipino corporation and Korean Corporation.  In its operation...

Read more

Offenses Not Bailab…

Offenses Not Bailable, Bail As A Matter Of DiscretionSec.  7.  Capital  offense  or  an  offense  punishable  by  reclusion perpetua  or  life  imprisonment,  not  bailable.  –  No  person  charged with  a  capital  offense,  or  an  offense  punisha...

Read more

IN RE: ALMACEN (31…

FACTS: Vicente Raul Almacen’s “Petition to Surrender Lawyer’s Certificate of Title,” filed on Sept. 26, 1967, in protest against what he therein asserts is “a great injustice committed against his client by Supreme Court”.  He indicts SC, in his own ...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook