
WHEN IS AN ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT LAWFUL?
Category: Criminal Procedure
WHEN IS AN ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT LAWFUL?
> A peace officer or private person may arrest without warrant:
1. When, in his presence, the person to be arrested has committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense;
2. When an offense has just been committed and he has probable cause to believe based on personal knowledge of facts or circumstances that the person to be arrested has committed it; and
3. When the person to be arrested is a prisoner who has escaped from a penal establishment or place where he is serving final judgment or is temporarily confined while his case is pending, or has escaped while being transferred from one confinement to another.
4. In hot pursuit
A POLICE OFFICER WAS CHASING A PERSON WHO HAD JUST COMMITTED AN OFFENSE. THE PERSON WENT INSIDE A HOUSE, SO THE POLICE OFFICER FOLLOWED. INSIDE THE HOUSE, THE POLICE OFFICER SAW DRUGS LYING AROUND. CAN HE CONFISCATE THE DRUGS AND USE THEM AS EVIDENCE?
> Yes. The plain view doctrine is applicable to this case because there was a valid prior intrusion. The police officer inadvertently discovered the evidence, he had a right to be there, and the evidence was immediately apparent.
WHAT IF THE OFFICER MERELY PEEKS THROUGH THE WINDOW OF THE HOUSE AND SEES THE DRUGS, CAN HE CONFISCATE THEM AND USE THEM AS EVIDENCE?
> He can confiscate them, without prejudice though to his liability for violation of domicile.
> He cannot use them as evidence because the seizure cannot be justified under the plain view doctrine, there being no previous valid intrusion.
WHAT IS THE EFFECT IF A WARRANTLESS ARREST IS ILLEGAL?
> It doesn't render void all other proceedings, including those leading to the conviction of the accused nor can the state deprived of its right to convict the guilty when all the facts of record point
to his culpability
Sec. 5. Arrest without warrant; when lawful. – A peace officer or a private person may, without a warrant, arrest a person:
(a) When, in his presence, the person to be arrested has committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense;
(b) When an offense has just been committed and he has probable cause to believe based on personal knowledge of facts or circumstances that the person to be arrested has committed it; and
(c) When the person to be arrested is a prisoner who has escaped from a penal establishment or place where he is serving final judgment or is temporarily confined while his case is pending, or has escaped while being transferred from one confinement to another.
In cases falling under paragraphs (a) and (b) above, the person arrested without a warrant shall be forthwith delivered to the nearest police station or jail and shall be proceeded against in accordance with section 7 of Rule 112.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
WHEN IS AN ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT LAWFUL?
Category: Criminal Procedure
WHEN IS AN ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT LAWFUL?
> A peace officer or private person may arrest without warrant:
1. When, in his presence, the person to be arrested has committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense;
2. When an offense has just been committed and he has probable cause to believe based on personal knowledge of facts or circumstances that the person to be arrested has committed it; and
3. When the person to be arrested is a prisoner who has escaped from a penal establishment or place where he is serving final judgment or is temporarily confined while his case is pending, or has escaped while being transferred from one confinement to another.
4. In hot pursuit
A POLICE OFFICER WAS CHASING A PERSON WHO HAD JUST COMMITTED AN OFFENSE. THE PERSON WENT INSIDE A HOUSE, SO THE POLICE OFFICER FOLLOWED. INSIDE THE HOUSE, THE POLICE OFFICER SAW DRUGS LYING AROUND. CAN HE CONFISCATE THE DRUGS AND USE THEM AS EVIDENCE?
> Yes. The plain view doctrine is applicable to this case because there was a valid prior intrusion. The police officer inadvertently discovered the evidence, he had a right to be there, and the evidence was immediately apparent.
WHAT IF THE OFFICER MERELY PEEKS THROUGH THE WINDOW OF THE HOUSE AND SEES THE DRUGS, CAN HE CONFISCATE THEM AND USE THEM AS EVIDENCE?
> He can confiscate them, without prejudice though to his liability for violation of domicile.
> He cannot use them as evidence because the seizure cannot be justified under the plain view doctrine, there being no previous valid intrusion.
WHAT IS THE EFFECT IF A WARRANTLESS ARREST IS ILLEGAL?
> It doesn't render void all other proceedings, including those leading to the conviction of the accused nor can the state deprived of its right to convict the guilty when all the facts of record point
to his culpability
Sec. 5. Arrest without warrant; when lawful. – A peace officer or a private person may, without a warrant, arrest a person:
(a) When, in his presence, the person to be arrested has committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense;
(b) When an offense has just been committed and he has probable cause to believe based on personal knowledge of facts or circumstances that the person to be arrested has committed it; and
(c) When the person to be arrested is a prisoner who has escaped from a penal establishment or place where he is serving final judgment or is temporarily confined while his case is pending, or has escaped while being transferred from one confinement to another.
In cases falling under paragraphs (a) and (b) above, the person arrested without a warrant shall be forthwith delivered to the nearest police station or jail and shall be proceeded against in accordance with section 7 of Rule 112.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 1 week ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
SOLIDBANK CORPORAT…
SOLIDBANK CORPORATION V. MINDANAO FERROALLOY CORPORATION GR 153535, JULY 28, 2005 FACTS: Mindanao Ferroalloy corporation is the fruit of a joint venture agreement between a Filipino corporation and Korean Corporation. In its operation...
Read moreOffenses Not Bailab…
Offenses Not Bailable, Bail As A Matter Of DiscretionSec. 7. Capital offense or an offense punishable by reclusion perpetua or life imprisonment, not bailable. – No person charged with a capital offense, or an offense punisha...
Read moreIN RE: ALMACEN (31…
FACTS: Vicente Raul Almacen’s “Petition to Surrender Lawyer’s Certificate of Title,” filed on Sept. 26, 1967, in protest against what he therein asserts is “a great injustice committed against his client by Supreme Court”. He indicts SC, in his own ...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

