
Withdrawal Of Improvident Plea Of Guilty
Category: Criminal Procedure
Withdrawal Of Improvident Plea Of Guilty
Sec. 5. Withdrawal of improvident plea of guilty.– At any time before the judgment of conviction becomes final, the court may permit an improvident plea of guilty to be withdrawn and be substituted by a plea of not guilty.
NOTE: The tenor of above provision is clear. There should be a categorical declaration from the accused that he is withdrawing his plea of guilty and substituting it with a plea of not guilty.
CAN AN IMPROVIDENT PLEA OF GUILTY BE WITHDRAWN AS A MATTER OF RIGHT?
> No, the withdrawal of the plea of guilty is not a matter of strict right to the accused but is within the discretion of the court.
> The reason behind this is that trial has already commenced and will put all of the past proceedings to waste. Therefore, the plea may only be withdrawn with permission of the court.
> Moreover, there is presumption that the plea was made voluntarily. The court must decide whether the consent of the accused was in fact vitiated when he entered his plea.
X IS CHARGED WITH HOMICIDE. HE PLEADS GUILTY, BUT TELLS THE JUDGE HINDI NIYA SINASADYA. IS HIS PLEA VALID?
> No. In order to be valid, the plea of guilty must be unconditional.
> In this case, X said hindi niya sinasadya. This is not a valid plea of guilty. A plea of not guilty should be entered instead.
MAY AN ACCUSED BE ALLOWED TO CHANGE HIS PLEA OF NOT GUILTY EVEN AFTER THE PROSECUTION HAD RESTED ITS CASE?
> The trial court may allow the accused to plead guilty to a lesser offense
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
Withdrawal Of Improvident Plea Of Guilty
Category: Criminal Procedure
Withdrawal Of Improvident Plea Of Guilty
Sec. 5. Withdrawal of improvident plea of guilty.– At any time before the judgment of conviction becomes final, the court may permit an improvident plea of guilty to be withdrawn and be substituted by a plea of not guilty.
NOTE: The tenor of above provision is clear. There should be a categorical declaration from the accused that he is withdrawing his plea of guilty and substituting it with a plea of not guilty.
CAN AN IMPROVIDENT PLEA OF GUILTY BE WITHDRAWN AS A MATTER OF RIGHT?
> No, the withdrawal of the plea of guilty is not a matter of strict right to the accused but is within the discretion of the court.
> The reason behind this is that trial has already commenced and will put all of the past proceedings to waste. Therefore, the plea may only be withdrawn with permission of the court.
> Moreover, there is presumption that the plea was made voluntarily. The court must decide whether the consent of the accused was in fact vitiated when he entered his plea.
X IS CHARGED WITH HOMICIDE. HE PLEADS GUILTY, BUT TELLS THE JUDGE HINDI NIYA SINASADYA. IS HIS PLEA VALID?
> No. In order to be valid, the plea of guilty must be unconditional.
> In this case, X said hindi niya sinasadya. This is not a valid plea of guilty. A plea of not guilty should be entered instead.
MAY AN ACCUSED BE ALLOWED TO CHANGE HIS PLEA OF NOT GUILTY EVEN AFTER THE PROSECUTION HAD RESTED ITS CASE?
> The trial court may allow the accused to plead guilty to a lesser offense
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 1 week ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
Shelter Principle
How does the “shelter principle” embodied in the Negotiable Instruments Law operate to give the rights of a holder in due course to a holder who does not have the status of a holder in due course? Briefly explain. Under the shelter principle, a p...
Read moreLiability With Rega…
What is the liability with regard to moral damages in a breach contract of carriage? General Rule: Moral damages are not recoverable for breach of contract of carriage in view of Art. 2219-‐20 of the Civil Code. Exceptions: 1. Where the mis...
Read moreTime Of Making Arre…
Time Of Making ArrestSec. 6. Time of making arrest. – An arrest may be made on any day and at any time of the day or night. Sec. 7. Method of arrest by officer by virtue of warrant. – When making an arrest by virtue of a warrant, the offic...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

