A+ A A-

Withdrawal Of Improvident Plea Of Guilty

Withdrawal  Of  Improvident  Plea  Of  Guilty

Sec.  5.  Withdrawal  of  improvident  plea  of  guilty.–  At  any  time before  the  judgment  of  conviction  becomes  final,  the  court  may permit  an  improvident  plea  of  guilty  to  be  withdrawn  and  be substituted by a plea of not guilty.
 

NOTE:    The  tenor  of  above  provision  is  clear.    There  should  be  a categorical declaration from the accused that he is withdrawing his plea of guilty and substituting it with a plea of not guilty.
 

CAN  AN  IMPROVIDENT  PLEA  OF  GUILTY  BE  WITHDRAWN  AS  A MATTER OF RIGHT?

>     No,  the  withdrawal  of  the  plea  of  guilty  is  not  a  matter  of  strict right to the accused but is within the discretion of the court.

>     The  reason  behind  this  is  that  trial  has  already  commenced  and will put all of the past proceedings to waste.  Therefore, the plea may only be withdrawn with permission of the court.

>     Moreover,   there   is   presumption   that   the   plea   was   made voluntarily.    The  court  must  decide  whether  the  consent  of  the accused was in fact vitiated when he entered his plea.

X  IS  CHARGED  WITH  HOMICIDE.    HE  PLEADS  GUILTY,  BUT  TELLS THE JUDGE HINDI NIYA SINASADYA.  IS HIS PLEA VALID?

>     No.  In order to be valid, the plea of guilty must be unconditional.

>     In this case, X said hindi niya sinasadya.  This is not a valid plea of guilty.  A plea of not guilty should be entered instead.
 

MAY  AN  ACCUSED  BE  ALLOWED  TO  CHANGE  HIS  PLEA  OF  NOT GUILTY EVEN AFTER THE PROSECUTION HAD RESTED ITS CASE?

>     The trial court may allow the accused to plead guilty to a lesser offense 


Withdrawal Of Improvident Plea Of Guilty

Withdrawal  Of  Improvident  Plea  Of  Guilty

Sec.  5.  Withdrawal  of  improvident  plea  of  guilty.–  At  any  time before  the  judgment  of  conviction  becomes  final,  the  court  may permit  an  improvident  plea  of  guilty  to  be  withdrawn  and  be substituted by a plea of not guilty.
 

NOTE:    The  tenor  of  above  provision  is  clear.    There  should  be  a categorical declaration from the accused that he is withdrawing his plea of guilty and substituting it with a plea of not guilty.
 

CAN  AN  IMPROVIDENT  PLEA  OF  GUILTY  BE  WITHDRAWN  AS  A MATTER OF RIGHT?

>     No,  the  withdrawal  of  the  plea  of  guilty  is  not  a  matter  of  strict right to the accused but is within the discretion of the court.

>     The  reason  behind  this  is  that  trial  has  already  commenced  and will put all of the past proceedings to waste.  Therefore, the plea may only be withdrawn with permission of the court.

>     Moreover,   there   is   presumption   that   the   plea   was   made voluntarily.    The  court  must  decide  whether  the  consent  of  the accused was in fact vitiated when he entered his plea.

X  IS  CHARGED  WITH  HOMICIDE.    HE  PLEADS  GUILTY,  BUT  TELLS THE JUDGE HINDI NIYA SINASADYA.  IS HIS PLEA VALID?

>     No.  In order to be valid, the plea of guilty must be unconditional.

>     In this case, X said hindi niya sinasadya.  This is not a valid plea of guilty.  A plea of not guilty should be entered instead.
 

MAY  AN  ACCUSED  BE  ALLOWED  TO  CHANGE  HIS  PLEA  OF  NOT GUILTY EVEN AFTER THE PROSECUTION HAD RESTED ITS CASE?

>     The trial court may allow the accused to plead guilty to a lesser offense 


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Shelter Principle

How does the “shelter principle” embodied in the Negotiable Instruments Law operate to give the rights of a holder in due course to a holder who does not have the status of a holder in due course? Briefly explain.   Under the shelter principle, a p...

Read more

Liability With Rega…

What is the liability with regard to moral damages in a breach contract of carriage?   General Rule: Moral damages are not recoverable for breach of contract of carriage in view of Art. 2219-­‐20 of the Civil Code.   Exceptions: 1. Where the mis...

Read more

Time Of Making Arre…

Time Of Making ArrestSec. 6. Time of making arrest. – An arrest may be made on any day and at any time of the day or night. Sec. 7. Method of arrest by officer by virtue of warrant. –  When  making  an  arrest  by  virtue  of  a  warrant,  the  offic...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook