
Counsel De Officio
Category: Criminal Procedure
Counsel De Officio
Sec. 7. Appointment of counsel de officio. – The court, considering the gravity of the offense and the difficulty of the questions that may arise, shall appoint as counsel de officio such members of the bar in good standing who, by reason of their experience and ability, can competently defend the accused. But in localities where such members of the bar are not available, the court may appoint any person, resident of the province and of good repute for probity and ability, to defend the accused.
Sec. 8. Time for counsel de officio to prepare for arraignment. – Whenever a counsel de office is appointed by the court to defend he accused at the arraignment, he shall be given a reasonable time to consult with the accused as to his plea before proceeding with the arraignment.
WHAT IS A COUNSEL DE OFFICIO?
> A counsel de officio is the counsel appointed by the court to represent and defend the accused in case he cannot afford to employ one himself
WHO CAN BE APPOINTED COUNSEL DE OFFICIO?
> The court, considering the gravity of the offense and the difficulty of the questions that may arise shall appoint as counsel de officio
1. A member of the bar in good standing
2. And such member, by reason of his/her experience and ability, can competently defend the accused
> ONLY DURING TRIAL: But, in localities where such members of the bar are not available, the court may appoint any person who
is—
1. A resident of the province
2. And of good repute for probity and with ability to defend the accused
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
Counsel De Officio
Category: Criminal Procedure
Counsel De Officio
Sec. 7. Appointment of counsel de officio. – The court, considering the gravity of the offense and the difficulty of the questions that may arise, shall appoint as counsel de officio such members of the bar in good standing who, by reason of their experience and ability, can competently defend the accused. But in localities where such members of the bar are not available, the court may appoint any person, resident of the province and of good repute for probity and ability, to defend the accused.
Sec. 8. Time for counsel de officio to prepare for arraignment. – Whenever a counsel de office is appointed by the court to defend he accused at the arraignment, he shall be given a reasonable time to consult with the accused as to his plea before proceeding with the arraignment.
WHAT IS A COUNSEL DE OFFICIO?
> A counsel de officio is the counsel appointed by the court to represent and defend the accused in case he cannot afford to employ one himself
WHO CAN BE APPOINTED COUNSEL DE OFFICIO?
> The court, considering the gravity of the offense and the difficulty of the questions that may arise shall appoint as counsel de officio
1. A member of the bar in good standing
2. And such member, by reason of his/her experience and ability, can competently defend the accused
> ONLY DURING TRIAL: But, in localities where such members of the bar are not available, the court may appoint any person who
is—
1. A resident of the province
2. And of good repute for probity and with ability to defend the accused
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 1 week ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
Requirements of an …
Requirements of an Insurance PolicySection 51. A policy of insurance must specify: (a) The parties between whom the contract is made; (b) The amount to be insured except in the cases of open or running policies; (c) The premium, or if the insuran...
Read moreAtienza v. Brillant…
FACTS: This a complaint by Lupo Atienza for gross immorality and appearance of impropriety against Judge Brillantes. Lupo Alleges that he has 2 children with Yolanda de Castro, who are living together in a hom...
Read moreForum Shopping And …
Forum Shopping And Its Effects1. ConceptThere is forum shopping when as a result of an adverse opinion in one forum, a party seeks favorable opinion, other than by appeal or certiorari in another.2. CasesSyjuco vs. Castro, G.R. No. 70403, July 7, 198...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

