A+ A A-

Suspension of Arraignment

Suspension of Arraignment

Sec.  11. Suspension of arraignment.  – Upon motion by the proper party, the arraignment shall be suspended in the following cases:
 
(a)  The  accused  appears  to  be  suffering  from  an  unsound  mental condition which effectively renders him unable to fully understand the  charge  against  him  and  to  plead  intelligently  thereto.  In  such case,   the   court   shall   order   his   mental   examination   and,   if necessary, his confinement for such purpose;

(b) There exists a prejudicial question; and
 
(c)  A  petition  for  review  of  the  resolution  of  the  prosecutor  is pending  at  either  the  Department  of  Justice,  or  the  Office  of  the President; provided, that the period of suspension shall not exceed sixty  (60)  days  counted  from  the  filing  of  the  petition  with  the reviewing office.
 

WHAT ARE THE GROUNDS FOR SUSPENDING ARRAIGNMENT?

1.    The  accused  appears  to  be  suffering  from  an  unsound  mental condition which effectively renders him unable to fully understand he charge against him and to plead intelligently thereto. In such
case,  the  court  shall  order  his  mental  examination  and,  if necessary, his confinement for such purpose;

2.    There exists a prejudicial question; and

3.    A petition for review of the resolution of the prosecutor is pending at either the Department of Justice, or the Office of the President; provided, that the period of suspension shall not exceed sixty (60)
days  counted  from  the  filing  of  the petition  with  the  reviewing office.
 

WHAT  IS  THE  TEST  TO  DETERMINE  WHETHER  THE  INSANITY  OF THE    ACCUSED    SHOULD    WARRANT    THE    SUSPENSION    OF PROCEEDINGS?

>     The  test  is  whether  the  accused  will  have  a  fair  trial  with  the assistance of counsel, in spite of his insanity
>     Not every aberration of the mind or exhibition of mental deficiency is sufficient to justify suspension 


Suspension of Arraignment

Suspension of Arraignment

Sec.  11. Suspension of arraignment.  – Upon motion by the proper party, the arraignment shall be suspended in the following cases:
 
(a)  The  accused  appears  to  be  suffering  from  an  unsound  mental condition which effectively renders him unable to fully understand the  charge  against  him  and  to  plead  intelligently  thereto.  In  such case,   the   court   shall   order   his   mental   examination   and,   if necessary, his confinement for such purpose;

(b) There exists a prejudicial question; and
 
(c)  A  petition  for  review  of  the  resolution  of  the  prosecutor  is pending  at  either  the  Department  of  Justice,  or  the  Office  of  the President; provided, that the period of suspension shall not exceed sixty  (60)  days  counted  from  the  filing  of  the  petition  with  the reviewing office.
 

WHAT ARE THE GROUNDS FOR SUSPENDING ARRAIGNMENT?

1.    The  accused  appears  to  be  suffering  from  an  unsound  mental condition which effectively renders him unable to fully understand he charge against him and to plead intelligently thereto. In such
case,  the  court  shall  order  his  mental  examination  and,  if necessary, his confinement for such purpose;

2.    There exists a prejudicial question; and

3.    A petition for review of the resolution of the prosecutor is pending at either the Department of Justice, or the Office of the President; provided, that the period of suspension shall not exceed sixty (60)
days  counted  from  the  filing  of  the petition  with  the  reviewing office.
 

WHAT  IS  THE  TEST  TO  DETERMINE  WHETHER  THE  INSANITY  OF THE    ACCUSED    SHOULD    WARRANT    THE    SUSPENSION    OF PROCEEDINGS?

>     The  test  is  whether  the  accused  will  have  a  fair  trial  with  the assistance of counsel, in spite of his insanity
>     Not every aberration of the mind or exhibition of mental deficiency is sufficient to justify suspension 


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Insular Life v. Fel…

Insular Life v. Feliciano - Concealment 73 PHIL 201 Facts: >  Evaristo Feliciano filed an application with Insular Life upon the solicitation of one of its agents. >  It appears that during that time, Evaristo was already suffering from tuber...

Read more

BALURAN V. NAVARRO …

BALURAN V. NAVARRO - UsufructThe manner of terminating the right of usufruct may be stipulated by the parties such as in this case, the happening of a resolutory condition.FACTS:Baluran and Paraiso (ancestor of Obedencio) entered into a contract whic...

Read more

Presidential Decree…

PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 1529AMENDING AND CODIFYING THE LAWS RELATIVE TO REGISTRATION OF PROPERTY AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES(Download text in Word format)

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook