
Suspension of Arraignment
Category: Criminal Procedure
Suspension of Arraignment
Sec. 11. Suspension of arraignment. – Upon motion by the proper party, the arraignment shall be suspended in the following cases:
(a) The accused appears to be suffering from an unsound mental condition which effectively renders him unable to fully understand the charge against him and to plead intelligently thereto. In such case, the court shall order his mental examination and, if necessary, his confinement for such purpose;
(b) There exists a prejudicial question; and
(c) A petition for review of the resolution of the prosecutor is pending at either the Department of Justice, or the Office of the President; provided, that the period of suspension shall not exceed sixty (60) days counted from the filing of the petition with the reviewing office.
WHAT ARE THE GROUNDS FOR SUSPENDING ARRAIGNMENT?
1. The accused appears to be suffering from an unsound mental condition which effectively renders him unable to fully understand he charge against him and to plead intelligently thereto. In such
case, the court shall order his mental examination and, if necessary, his confinement for such purpose;
2. There exists a prejudicial question; and
3. A petition for review of the resolution of the prosecutor is pending at either the Department of Justice, or the Office of the President; provided, that the period of suspension shall not exceed sixty (60)
days counted from the filing of the petition with the reviewing office.
WHAT IS THE TEST TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE INSANITY OF THE ACCUSED SHOULD WARRANT THE SUSPENSION OF PROCEEDINGS?
> The test is whether the accused will have a fair trial with the assistance of counsel, in spite of his insanity
> Not every aberration of the mind or exhibition of mental deficiency is sufficient to justify suspension
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
Suspension of Arraignment
Category: Criminal Procedure
Suspension of Arraignment
Sec. 11. Suspension of arraignment. – Upon motion by the proper party, the arraignment shall be suspended in the following cases:
(a) The accused appears to be suffering from an unsound mental condition which effectively renders him unable to fully understand the charge against him and to plead intelligently thereto. In such case, the court shall order his mental examination and, if necessary, his confinement for such purpose;
(b) There exists a prejudicial question; and
(c) A petition for review of the resolution of the prosecutor is pending at either the Department of Justice, or the Office of the President; provided, that the period of suspension shall not exceed sixty (60) days counted from the filing of the petition with the reviewing office.
WHAT ARE THE GROUNDS FOR SUSPENDING ARRAIGNMENT?
1. The accused appears to be suffering from an unsound mental condition which effectively renders him unable to fully understand he charge against him and to plead intelligently thereto. In such
case, the court shall order his mental examination and, if necessary, his confinement for such purpose;
2. There exists a prejudicial question; and
3. A petition for review of the resolution of the prosecutor is pending at either the Department of Justice, or the Office of the President; provided, that the period of suspension shall not exceed sixty (60)
days counted from the filing of the petition with the reviewing office.
WHAT IS THE TEST TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE INSANITY OF THE ACCUSED SHOULD WARRANT THE SUSPENSION OF PROCEEDINGS?
> The test is whether the accused will have a fair trial with the assistance of counsel, in spite of his insanity
> Not every aberration of the mind or exhibition of mental deficiency is sufficient to justify suspension
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 1 week ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
Insular Life v. Fel…
Insular Life v. Feliciano - Concealment 73 PHIL 201 Facts: > Evaristo Feliciano filed an application with Insular Life upon the solicitation of one of its agents. > It appears that during that time, Evaristo was already suffering from tuber...
Read moreBALURAN V. NAVARRO …
BALURAN V. NAVARRO - UsufructThe manner of terminating the right of usufruct may be stipulated by the parties such as in this case, the happening of a resolutory condition.FACTS:Baluran and Paraiso (ancestor of Obedencio) entered into a contract whic...
Read morePresidential Decree…
PRESIDENTIAL DECREE NO. 1529AMENDING AND CODIFYING THE LAWS RELATIVE TO REGISTRATION OF PROPERTY AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES(Download text in Word format)
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

