A+ A A-

HABEAS CORPUS

WHAT IS HABEAS CORPUS?

     Habeas corpus means “having it brought” plus “body”

     To inquire into the legality of the detention of a person

     A writ or order requiring that a prisoner be brought before a judge or into court to decide whether he is being held lawfully.
 

WHY  IS  HABEAS  CORPUS  CONSIDERED  AN  EXCEPTION  TO  THE EXCEPTION?

     Because  it  is  a  prerogative  writ  and  therefore  must  be  decided upon immediately by the court

     The  habeas  corpus  proceeding  must  take  precedence  over  all other cases because it involves the liberty of the person
 

WITHIN HOW MANY HOURS SHOULD A JUDGE RESOLVE A HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING?

     Within 48 hours or 2 days
 

WHAT ARE THE DUTIES OF THE PUBLIC ATTORNEY IF THE ACCUSED ASSIGNED TO HIM IS IMPRISONED?

1.    He shall promptly undertake to obtain the presence of the prisoner for  trial,  or  cause  a  notice  to  be  served  on  the  person  having custody  of  the  prisoner,  requiring  such  person  to  advise  the
prisoner of his right to demand trial

2.    Upon  receipt  of  that  notice,  the  person  having  custody  of  the prisoner shall promptly advise the prisoner of the charge and his right  to  demand  trial.    If  at  anytime  thereafter,  the  prisoner
informs the custodian that he demands such trial, the latter shall cause  notice  to  that  effect  to  be  sent  promptly  to  the  public attorney

3.    Upon  receipt  of  such  notice,  the  public  attorney  shall  promptly seek to obtain the presence of the prisoner for trial

4.    When the person having custody of the prisoner receives from the public attorney a properly supported request for the availability of the  prisoner  for  purposes  of  trial,  the  prisoner  shall  be  made
available accordingly. 


HABEAS CORPUS

WHAT IS HABEAS CORPUS?

     Habeas corpus means “having it brought” plus “body”

     To inquire into the legality of the detention of a person

     A writ or order requiring that a prisoner be brought before a judge or into court to decide whether he is being held lawfully.
 

WHY  IS  HABEAS  CORPUS  CONSIDERED  AN  EXCEPTION  TO  THE EXCEPTION?

     Because  it  is  a  prerogative  writ  and  therefore  must  be  decided upon immediately by the court

     The  habeas  corpus  proceeding  must  take  precedence  over  all other cases because it involves the liberty of the person
 

WITHIN HOW MANY HOURS SHOULD A JUDGE RESOLVE A HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING?

     Within 48 hours or 2 days
 

WHAT ARE THE DUTIES OF THE PUBLIC ATTORNEY IF THE ACCUSED ASSIGNED TO HIM IS IMPRISONED?

1.    He shall promptly undertake to obtain the presence of the prisoner for  trial,  or  cause  a  notice  to  be  served  on  the  person  having custody  of  the  prisoner,  requiring  such  person  to  advise  the
prisoner of his right to demand trial

2.    Upon  receipt  of  that  notice,  the  person  having  custody  of  the prisoner shall promptly advise the prisoner of the charge and his right  to  demand  trial.    If  at  anytime  thereafter,  the  prisoner
informs the custodian that he demands such trial, the latter shall cause  notice  to  that  effect  to  be  sent  promptly  to  the  public attorney

3.    Upon  receipt  of  such  notice,  the  public  attorney  shall  promptly seek to obtain the presence of the prisoner for trial

4.    When the person having custody of the prisoner receives from the public attorney a properly supported request for the availability of the  prisoner  for  purposes  of  trial,  the  prisoner  shall  be  made
available accordingly. 


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

LEGAL EASEMENTS- Ea…

LEGAL EASEMENTSGENERAL PROVISIONSArt. 634. Easements imposed by law have for their object either public use or the interest of private persons. (549)LEGAL EASEMENTS DEFINED> They are the easements imposed by the law, and which have for their object e...

Read more

LAW in General

LAW in GeneralAccording to Justice Bradley, US Supreme Court:Law is a science of principles by which the civil society is regulated and held together, by which right is enforced, and wrong is detected and punished.According to De Page:The body of rul...

Read more

In what causes shal…

1. Force majeure 2. Obligations contracted for the vessel’s benefit, except when the captain expressly agrees to be liable.

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook