
HABEAS CORPUS
Category: Criminal Procedure
WHAT IS HABEAS CORPUS?
Habeas corpus means “having it brought” plus “body”
To inquire into the legality of the detention of a person
A writ or order requiring that a prisoner be brought before a judge or into court to decide whether he is being held lawfully.
WHY IS HABEAS CORPUS CONSIDERED AN EXCEPTION TO THE EXCEPTION?
Because it is a prerogative writ and therefore must be decided upon immediately by the court
The habeas corpus proceeding must take precedence over all other cases because it involves the liberty of the person
WITHIN HOW MANY HOURS SHOULD A JUDGE RESOLVE A HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING?
Within 48 hours or 2 days
WHAT ARE THE DUTIES OF THE PUBLIC ATTORNEY IF THE ACCUSED ASSIGNED TO HIM IS IMPRISONED?
1. He shall promptly undertake to obtain the presence of the prisoner for trial, or cause a notice to be served on the person having custody of the prisoner, requiring such person to advise the
prisoner of his right to demand trial
2. Upon receipt of that notice, the person having custody of the prisoner shall promptly advise the prisoner of the charge and his right to demand trial. If at anytime thereafter, the prisoner
informs the custodian that he demands such trial, the latter shall cause notice to that effect to be sent promptly to the public attorney
3. Upon receipt of such notice, the public attorney shall promptly seek to obtain the presence of the prisoner for trial
4. When the person having custody of the prisoner receives from the public attorney a properly supported request for the availability of the prisoner for purposes of trial, the prisoner shall be made
available accordingly.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
HABEAS CORPUS
Category: Criminal Procedure
WHAT IS HABEAS CORPUS?
Habeas corpus means “having it brought” plus “body”
To inquire into the legality of the detention of a person
A writ or order requiring that a prisoner be brought before a judge or into court to decide whether he is being held lawfully.
WHY IS HABEAS CORPUS CONSIDERED AN EXCEPTION TO THE EXCEPTION?
Because it is a prerogative writ and therefore must be decided upon immediately by the court
The habeas corpus proceeding must take precedence over all other cases because it involves the liberty of the person
WITHIN HOW MANY HOURS SHOULD A JUDGE RESOLVE A HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING?
Within 48 hours or 2 days
WHAT ARE THE DUTIES OF THE PUBLIC ATTORNEY IF THE ACCUSED ASSIGNED TO HIM IS IMPRISONED?
1. He shall promptly undertake to obtain the presence of the prisoner for trial, or cause a notice to be served on the person having custody of the prisoner, requiring such person to advise the
prisoner of his right to demand trial
2. Upon receipt of that notice, the person having custody of the prisoner shall promptly advise the prisoner of the charge and his right to demand trial. If at anytime thereafter, the prisoner
informs the custodian that he demands such trial, the latter shall cause notice to that effect to be sent promptly to the public attorney
3. Upon receipt of such notice, the public attorney shall promptly seek to obtain the presence of the prisoner for trial
4. When the person having custody of the prisoner receives from the public attorney a properly supported request for the availability of the prisoner for purposes of trial, the prisoner shall be made
available accordingly.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 1 week ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
LEGAL EASEMENTS- Ea…
LEGAL EASEMENTSGENERAL PROVISIONSArt. 634. Easements imposed by law have for their object either public use or the interest of private persons. (549)LEGAL EASEMENTS DEFINED> They are the easements imposed by the law, and which have for their object e...
Read moreLAW in General
LAW in GeneralAccording to Justice Bradley, US Supreme Court:Law is a science of principles by which the civil society is regulated and held together, by which right is enforced, and wrong is detected and punished.According to De Page:The body of rul...
Read moreIn what causes shal…
1. Force majeure 2. Obligations contracted for the vessel’s benefit, except when the captain expressly agrees to be liable.
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

