A+ A A-

REOPENING OF THE CASE, CONDITIONS REQUIRED

Sec. 24. Reopening. – At any time before finality of the judgment of conviction,  the  judge  may,  motu  proprio  or  upon  motion,  with hearing   in   either   case,   reopen   the   proceedings   to   avoid   a miscarriage of justice. The proceedings shall be terminated within thirty (30) days from the order granting it.

WHEN CAN A CASE BE REOPENED?

     At  any  time  before  the  finality  of  judgment  of  conviction,  the judge  may  reopen  the  case  either  on  his  own  volition  or  upon motion,  with  hearing  on  either  case,   in  order  to  avoid  a
miscarriage of justice

     The  proceedings  should  be  terminated  within  30  days  from  the order granting the reopening of the case
 

WHEN CAN THERE BE A DENIAL OF THE REOPENING OF THE CASE, GIVEN THAT ALL CONDITIONS REQUIRED?

     It would be prejudicial to the rights of an accused

     Examples  of  this  when  the  accused  cannot  present  enough evidence, present his witnesses, etc.  


REOPENING OF THE CASE, CONDITIONS REQUIRED

Sec. 24. Reopening. – At any time before finality of the judgment of conviction,  the  judge  may,  motu  proprio  or  upon  motion,  with hearing   in   either   case,   reopen   the   proceedings   to   avoid   a miscarriage of justice. The proceedings shall be terminated within thirty (30) days from the order granting it.

WHEN CAN A CASE BE REOPENED?

     At  any  time  before  the  finality  of  judgment  of  conviction,  the judge  may  reopen  the  case  either  on  his  own  volition  or  upon motion,  with  hearing  on  either  case,   in  order  to  avoid  a
miscarriage of justice

     The  proceedings  should  be  terminated  within  30  days  from  the order granting the reopening of the case
 

WHEN CAN THERE BE A DENIAL OF THE REOPENING OF THE CASE, GIVEN THAT ALL CONDITIONS REQUIRED?

     It would be prejudicial to the rights of an accused

     Examples  of  this  when  the  accused  cannot  present  enough evidence, present his witnesses, etc.  


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

MEDEL V. CA, 299 SC…

FACTS:   Four loans were involved in this case. The first loan was  secured by the spouses Medel from Gonzales in the amount of P50,000 wherein P3,000 was withheld by the latter as advance interest.  This was secured by a promissory note. The secon...

Read more

ROLE OF SOLICITOR G…

ROLE OF SOLICITOR GENERAL IN LAND REGISTRATION PROCEEDINGS> In practice, the Solicitor General is always furnished with a copy of a notice of initial hearing> Solicitor General represents the Government in all land registration and related proceeding...

Read more

Date Of Commission …

Date Of Commission Of The OffenseSec. 11. Date of commission of the offense. - It is not necessary to state in the  complaint or information the precise date the offense was  committed  except  when  it  is  a  material  ingredient  of  theoffense. T...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook