A+ A A-

Fernandez Hermanos, Inc. VS. CIR- Allowable Tax Deductions

That the circumstances are such that the method does not reflect the taxpayer ’ s income with reasonable accuracy and certainty and proper and just additions of personal expenses and other non-deductible expenditures were made and correct , fair and equitable credit adjustments were given by way of eliminating non- taxable items.


FACTS:


• Four cases involve two decisions of the Court of Tax Appeal s determining the taxpayer ' s income tax liability for the years 1950 to 1954 and for the year 1957. Both the taxpayer and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, as petitioner and respondent in the cases a quo respectively , appealed from the Tax Court's decisions , insofar as their respective contentions on particular tax items were therein resolved against them. Since the issues raised are inter related, the Court resolves the four appeals in this joint decision.
• The taxpayer , Fernandez Hermanos, Inc. , is a domestic corporation organized for the principal purpose of engaging in business as an " investment company " wi th main office at Manila. Upon verification of the taxpayer's income tax returns for the period in quest ion, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed against the taxpayer the sums of P13,414.00, P119,613.00, P11,698.00, P6,887.00 and P14,451.00 as alleged deficiency income taxes for the year s 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953 and 1954, respectively. Said assessments were the result of alleged discrepancies found upon the examination and verification of the taxpayer's income tax returns for the said years, summarized by the Tax Court in its decision of June 10, 1963 in CTA Case No. 787, as follows:

 

ISSUE: The correctness of the Tax Court's rulings with respect to the disputed items of disallowances enumerated in the Tax Court's summary reproduced


HELD:

That the circumstances are such that the method does not reflect the taxpayer’s income with reasonable accuracy and certainty and proper and just additions of personal expenses and other non-deductible expenditures were made and correct , fair and equitable credit adjustments were given by way of eliminating non-taxable items.


Proper adjustments to conform to the income tax laws. Proper adjustments for non-deductible items must be made. The following non-deductibles , as the case may be, must be
added to the increase of decrease in the net worth:


1. Personal living or family expenses
2. Premiums paid on any life insurance policy
3. Losses from sales or exchanges of property between members of the family
4. Income taxes paid
5. Other non-deductible taxes
6. Election expenses and other expense against public policy
7. Non-deductible contributions
8. Gifts to others
9. Estate inheritance and gift taxes
10. Net Capital Loss


On the other hand, non- taxable items should be deducted therefrom. These items are necessary adjustments to avoid the inclusion of what otherwise are non-taxable receipts. They are:
1. inheritance gifts and bequests received
2. non- taxable gains
3. compensation for injuries or sickness
4. proceeds of life insurance policies
5. sweepstakes
6. winnings
7. interest on government securities and increase in net worth are not taxable if they are shown not to be the result of unreported income but to be the result of the correction of errors in the taxpayer’s entries in the books relating to indebtedness

 

Fernandez Hermanos, Inc. VS. CIR- Allowable Tax Deductions


Fernandez Hermanos, Inc. VS. CIR- Allowable Tax Deductions

That the circumstances are such that the method does not reflect the taxpayer ’ s income with reasonable accuracy and certainty and proper and just additions of personal expenses and other non-deductible expenditures were made and correct , fair and equitable credit adjustments were given by way of eliminating non- taxable items.


FACTS:


• Four cases involve two decisions of the Court of Tax Appeal s determining the taxpayer ' s income tax liability for the years 1950 to 1954 and for the year 1957. Both the taxpayer and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, as petitioner and respondent in the cases a quo respectively , appealed from the Tax Court's decisions , insofar as their respective contentions on particular tax items were therein resolved against them. Since the issues raised are inter related, the Court resolves the four appeals in this joint decision.
• The taxpayer , Fernandez Hermanos, Inc. , is a domestic corporation organized for the principal purpose of engaging in business as an " investment company " wi th main office at Manila. Upon verification of the taxpayer's income tax returns for the period in quest ion, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed against the taxpayer the sums of P13,414.00, P119,613.00, P11,698.00, P6,887.00 and P14,451.00 as alleged deficiency income taxes for the year s 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953 and 1954, respectively. Said assessments were the result of alleged discrepancies found upon the examination and verification of the taxpayer's income tax returns for the said years, summarized by the Tax Court in its decision of June 10, 1963 in CTA Case No. 787, as follows:

 

ISSUE: The correctness of the Tax Court's rulings with respect to the disputed items of disallowances enumerated in the Tax Court's summary reproduced


HELD:

That the circumstances are such that the method does not reflect the taxpayer’s income with reasonable accuracy and certainty and proper and just additions of personal expenses and other non-deductible expenditures were made and correct , fair and equitable credit adjustments were given by way of eliminating non-taxable items.


Proper adjustments to conform to the income tax laws. Proper adjustments for non-deductible items must be made. The following non-deductibles , as the case may be, must be
added to the increase of decrease in the net worth:


1. Personal living or family expenses
2. Premiums paid on any life insurance policy
3. Losses from sales or exchanges of property between members of the family
4. Income taxes paid
5. Other non-deductible taxes
6. Election expenses and other expense against public policy
7. Non-deductible contributions
8. Gifts to others
9. Estate inheritance and gift taxes
10. Net Capital Loss


On the other hand, non- taxable items should be deducted therefrom. These items are necessary adjustments to avoid the inclusion of what otherwise are non-taxable receipts. They are:
1. inheritance gifts and bequests received
2. non- taxable gains
3. compensation for injuries or sickness
4. proceeds of life insurance policies
5. sweepstakes
6. winnings
7. interest on government securities and increase in net worth are not taxable if they are shown not to be the result of unreported income but to be the result of the correction of errors in the taxpayer’s entries in the books relating to indebtedness

 

Fernandez Hermanos, Inc. VS. CIR- Allowable Tax Deductions


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Evasion of Service …

Evasion of Service of SentenceEvasion means to escape or to avoid serving a penalty. Only prisoners who have been sentenced by final judgment are liable for evasion. The penalty of the accused must be one of imprisonment or destierro. There are three...

Read more

RIGHT TO BE A WITNE…

WHAT IS THE WEIGHT OF THE TESTIMONY OF THE ACCUSED WHO TESTIFIES  ON  HIS  OWN  BEHALF  BUT  REFUSES  TO  BE  CROSS-EXAMINED? >The testimony will not be given any weight >It will not have probative value because the prosecution was not given  the  ch...

Read more

DIONISIO V. ORTIZ 2…

DIONISIO V. ORTIZ204 SCRA 745FACTS:Petitioners were owners of contiguous lots. Adjacent to it were the lots of private respondents. Through an agreement, they were granted a right of way over Howmart Road, transverring through the properties of priva...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook