
PLEDGE OR MORTGAGE INDIVISIBLE, EXCEPTIONS
Category: Obligations and Contracts
PLEDGE OR MORTGAGE INDIVISIBLE, EXCEPTIONS
Art. 2089. A pledge or mortgage is indivisible, even though the debt may be divided among the successors in interest of the debtor or of the creditor.
Therefore, the debtor’s heir who has paid a part of the debt cannot ask for the proportionate extinguishment of the pledge or mortgage as long as the debt is not completely satisfied.
Neither can the creditor’s heir who received his share of the debt return the pledge or cancel the mortgage, to the prejudice of the other heirs who have not been paid.
From these provisions is expected the case in which, there being several things given in mortgage or pledge, each one of them guarantees only a determinate portion of the credit.
The debtor, in this case, shall have a right to the extinguishment of the pledge or mortgage as the portion of the debt for which each thing is specially answerable is satisfied. (1860)
Art. 2090. The indivisibility of a pledge or mortgage is not affected by the fact that the debtors are not solidarily liable. (n)
PLEDGE OR MORTGAGE INDIVISIBLE
> Rule applies even if the obligation is joint and not solidary
> The divisibility of the principal obligation doesn't affect the indivisibility of the mortgage or pledge
EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE OF INDIVISIBILITY
1. Where each one of several things guarantees determinate portions of credit
2. Where only a portion of the loan was released
3. Where there was failure of consideration
4. Where there is no debtor-creditor relationship
FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGE CONSTITUTED ON SEVERAL PROPERTIES
> A mortgage even constituted on several properties is one and indivisible, that is, it cannot be divided among the several properties and the mortgagee has the right to have the properties either or both, jointly or singly, sold to satisfy his claim
> Further, the sale of the mortgaged properties cannot be set aside in the absence of evidence to show that a better price could have been obtained if they were sold separately, or the sale of one or some alone would bring sufficient proceeds to satisfy the mortgage credit
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
PLEDGE OR MORTGAGE INDIVISIBLE, EXCEPTIONS
Category: Obligations and Contracts
PLEDGE OR MORTGAGE INDIVISIBLE, EXCEPTIONS
Art. 2089. A pledge or mortgage is indivisible, even though the debt may be divided among the successors in interest of the debtor or of the creditor.
Therefore, the debtor’s heir who has paid a part of the debt cannot ask for the proportionate extinguishment of the pledge or mortgage as long as the debt is not completely satisfied.
Neither can the creditor’s heir who received his share of the debt return the pledge or cancel the mortgage, to the prejudice of the other heirs who have not been paid.
From these provisions is expected the case in which, there being several things given in mortgage or pledge, each one of them guarantees only a determinate portion of the credit.
The debtor, in this case, shall have a right to the extinguishment of the pledge or mortgage as the portion of the debt for which each thing is specially answerable is satisfied. (1860)
Art. 2090. The indivisibility of a pledge or mortgage is not affected by the fact that the debtors are not solidarily liable. (n)
PLEDGE OR MORTGAGE INDIVISIBLE
> Rule applies even if the obligation is joint and not solidary
> The divisibility of the principal obligation doesn't affect the indivisibility of the mortgage or pledge
EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULE OF INDIVISIBILITY
1. Where each one of several things guarantees determinate portions of credit
2. Where only a portion of the loan was released
3. Where there was failure of consideration
4. Where there is no debtor-creditor relationship
FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGE CONSTITUTED ON SEVERAL PROPERTIES
> A mortgage even constituted on several properties is one and indivisible, that is, it cannot be divided among the several properties and the mortgagee has the right to have the properties either or both, jointly or singly, sold to satisfy his claim
> Further, the sale of the mortgaged properties cannot be set aside in the absence of evidence to show that a better price could have been obtained if they were sold separately, or the sale of one or some alone would bring sufficient proceeds to satisfy the mortgage credit
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 5 days, 23 hours ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 3 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 3 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
Who may be an insur…
Who may be an insurer? A foreign or domestic insurance company may transact business in the Philippines but must first obtain a certificate of authority for that purpose from the Insurance Commissioner who has the discretion to refuse to issue such ...
Read moreTHE MEANING OF THE …
THE MEANING OF THE TERM “REGULAR COURTS”> It refers to civil courts as opposed to military courts> Military courts cannot try and exercise jurisdiction over civilians for offenses allegedly committed by them as long as civil courts ...
Read moreVILLANUEVA v. CASTA…
VILLANUEVA v. CASTAÑEDA, JR.FACTSPetitioners are owners of stalls in a talipapa located in a land owned by the municipal government. They were ed to lease the said land through a municipal council resolution in 1961.The municipal government demolishe...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

