A+ A A-

BAES V. CA 224 SCRA 562

BAES V. CA
224 SCRA 562

FACTS:

A parcel of land was dug by the government for the construction of a canal to  streamline  the  river.    Baes  eventually  bought  the  land,  which  was subdivided  into  3  parcels.    The  middle  parcel  covered  the  canal.    The government  gave  him  another  equivalent  parcel  as  compensation.    After resurvey, it was discovered that there were errors.  New TCT’s were issued to  represent  the  enlargements.    Government  opposed  as  the  lots  were allegedly unlawfully enlarged.  Baes averred that he should own dried up land as the creek was discovered to the canal in his property.
 

HELD:

If the riparian owner is entitled to compensation for the damage to or loss of his property due to natural causes, all the more reason to compensate him  when  the  change  in  the  course  of  river  is  effected  through  artificial means.


BAES V. CA 224 SCRA 562

BAES V. CA
224 SCRA 562

FACTS:

A parcel of land was dug by the government for the construction of a canal to  streamline  the  river.    Baes  eventually  bought  the  land,  which  was subdivided  into  3  parcels.    The  middle  parcel  covered  the  canal.    The government  gave  him  another  equivalent  parcel  as  compensation.    After resurvey, it was discovered that there were errors.  New TCT’s were issued to  represent  the  enlargements.    Government  opposed  as  the  lots  were allegedly unlawfully enlarged.  Baes averred that he should own dried up land as the creek was discovered to the canal in his property.
 

HELD:

If the riparian owner is entitled to compensation for the damage to or loss of his property due to natural causes, all the more reason to compensate him  when  the  change  in  the  course  of  river  is  effected  through  artificial means.


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Who may be an insur…

Who may be an insurer? A foreign or domestic insurance company may transact business in the Philippines but must first obtain a certificate of authority for that purpose from the Insurance Commissioner who has the discretion to refuse to issue such ...

Read more

VILLANUEVA v FLOREN…

VILLANUEVA v. FLORENDO- Third PartyThe “third party” contemplated in Art. 1620 refers to those who are not heirs in succession, either contemplated by will or by law to succeed the deceased.FACTS: Spouses Villanueva and Garcia, parents of the petitio...

Read more

Admissibility of Ev…

Section 3 Rules of Court. Admissibility of evidence- Evidence is admissible when it is relevant to the issue and is not excluded by law or these rules.     I. Introduction. A. Admissibility- the character or quality which any material must neces...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook