A+ A A-

ASIA BREWERY V. COURT OF APPEALS 224 SCRA 437- Corporate Names

ASIA BREWERY V. COURT OF APPEALS

224 SCRA 437

FACTS:

SMC filed a case against petitioner for infringement of trademark. It alleged that the bottles used by Asia Brewery were confusingly similar to those used by SMC in the packaging of its beer. The trial court held in favor of Asia Brewery but was reversed in the appellate court.

HELD:

Using the holistic test, wherein all circumstances were given consideration, there was no infringement committed by petitioner. There are two tests available for colorable imitation. One is the dominancy test. If the form, marks, contents, words of other special arrangement or general appearance of the two marks or devices are such as would likely mislead persons in the ordinary course of purchasing the genuine article, then the similarity is such as would entitle the opposer to equitable protection.

Under the holistic test, on the other hand, the opposing trademarks are compared in their entirety to determine confusing similarity.


ASIA BREWERY V. COURT OF APPEALS 224 SCRA 437- Corporate Names

ASIA BREWERY V. COURT OF APPEALS

224 SCRA 437

FACTS:

SMC filed a case against petitioner for infringement of trademark. It alleged that the bottles used by Asia Brewery were confusingly similar to those used by SMC in the packaging of its beer. The trial court held in favor of Asia Brewery but was reversed in the appellate court.

HELD:

Using the holistic test, wherein all circumstances were given consideration, there was no infringement committed by petitioner. There are two tests available for colorable imitation. One is the dominancy test. If the form, marks, contents, words of other special arrangement or general appearance of the two marks or devices are such as would likely mislead persons in the ordinary course of purchasing the genuine article, then the similarity is such as would entitle the opposer to equitable protection.

Under the holistic test, on the other hand, the opposing trademarks are compared in their entirety to determine confusing similarity.


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Double Sale

Double SaleIt was contend that when buyers bought the property they knew that the same property was previously sold to them. Therefore, since they are buyers in bad faith, ownership of the property must pertain to the buyers, who, in good faith, were...

Read more

ADLAWAN V. ADLAWAN,…

ADLAWAN V. ADLAWANJANUARY 20, 2006FACTS:Arnelito was an illegitimate child of respondents’ brother. He filed a case for unlawful detainer against respondents for he is allegedly the sole heir of the house and lot. The respondents on the other hand co...

Read more

HEIRS OF JUAN OCLAR…

HEIRS OF JUAN OCLARIT v. CAFACTS:Juan Oclarit purchased an unregistered land in Bohol for P100 from Macalos. This particular land did not have specified boundaries, as it was only indicated that the borders were a brook, lands of Gales, and another o...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook