A+ A A-

ACTS OF LASCIVIOUSNESS

ACTS OF LASCIVIOUSNESS


A. Concept: the act of making a physical contact with the body of another person for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification other than, or  without  intention of,  sexual intercourse.

1. The contact may be by the body of the accused such as by the lips, hands, foot; or by means of any object or instrument. In either case there must be no form of insertion into the anus, mouth or sex organ amounting to rape through sexual abuse.  

2. It is distinguished from Attempted Rape in that there is no intent to have sexual intercourse with the victim. The intent may be inferred from the circumstances of time, place, and occasion, or inferred from the nature of the act itself.

3. It is distinguished from Unjust Vexation in that there is no lewd design in unjust vexation

Example: (i) The acts of an ardent lover such as kissing, embracing arising from his passion, are unjust vexation merely. (ii). The touching of the private parts of a woman out of curiosity is unjust vexation.

4. If the acts of lasciviousness (including sexual intercourse) is performed upon a child exploited in prostitution or other sexual abuse (i.e. abuse other than the acts of lasciviousness such as when the child is the subject of an obscene publication or pornography or of indecent shows) whether male or female, the acts would constitute sexual abuse punished under R.A. 7610 ( The Child Abuse Law) ( Olivarez vs. C.A., July 29, 2006)


B. Kinds:

1. Forcible (Article 336) if made under circumstances of forcible rape, i.e through force, threat, violation, intimidation.


      a. The accused may be any person and the victim may be a male or female

2. Consented: (Article 339) if made under circumstances of seduction whether simple or qualified i.e.


      a) victim is a female of chaste character

      b) over 12 years  but below 18 years, or  a widow

      c) there was deceit or abuse of authority, abuse of confidence or abuse of relationship


ACTS OF LASCIVIOUSNESS

ACTS OF LASCIVIOUSNESS


A. Concept: the act of making a physical contact with the body of another person for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification other than, or  without  intention of,  sexual intercourse.

1. The contact may be by the body of the accused such as by the lips, hands, foot; or by means of any object or instrument. In either case there must be no form of insertion into the anus, mouth or sex organ amounting to rape through sexual abuse.  

2. It is distinguished from Attempted Rape in that there is no intent to have sexual intercourse with the victim. The intent may be inferred from the circumstances of time, place, and occasion, or inferred from the nature of the act itself.

3. It is distinguished from Unjust Vexation in that there is no lewd design in unjust vexation

Example: (i) The acts of an ardent lover such as kissing, embracing arising from his passion, are unjust vexation merely. (ii). The touching of the private parts of a woman out of curiosity is unjust vexation.

4. If the acts of lasciviousness (including sexual intercourse) is performed upon a child exploited in prostitution or other sexual abuse (i.e. abuse other than the acts of lasciviousness such as when the child is the subject of an obscene publication or pornography or of indecent shows) whether male or female, the acts would constitute sexual abuse punished under R.A. 7610 ( The Child Abuse Law) ( Olivarez vs. C.A., July 29, 2006)


B. Kinds:

1. Forcible (Article 336) if made under circumstances of forcible rape, i.e through force, threat, violation, intimidation.


      a. The accused may be any person and the victim may be a male or female

2. Consented: (Article 339) if made under circumstances of seduction whether simple or qualified i.e.


      a) victim is a female of chaste character

      b) over 12 years  but below 18 years, or  a widow

      c) there was deceit or abuse of authority, abuse of confidence or abuse of relationship


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Usurious contracts,…

Article  1961.    Usurious  contracts  shall  be  governed  by  the Usury  Law  and  other  special  laws,  so  far  as  they  are  not inconsistent with this Code. WHY  SHOULD  THERE  BE  A  PROVISION  ON  THE  PURPOSE WHEN IT IS ONLY THE CONCERN OF...

Read more

EFFECT OF PRESCRIPT…

WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF PRESCRIPTION OF THE OFFENSE ON THE CIVIL LIABILITY OF ACCUSED? >     The  extinction  of  the  criminal  action  doesn’t  carry  with  it  the extinction  of  the  civil  action  to  enforce  civil  liability  arising  from the ...

Read more
Judicial Settlement of Estates

Judicial Settlement…

1. Depending on the pendency of the settlement, the estate through the executor, administrator or his heirs is liable for the payment of the estate income tax. [Sec. 60 (3)]2. If upon the termination of the judicial settlement, when the decision of t...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook