A+ A A-

Soliman v. US Life- Rescind Contract of Insurance

Soliman v. US Life- Rescind Contract of Insurance

104 PHIL 1046

Facts:

>  US Life issued a 20 yr endowment life policy on the joint lives of Patricio Soliman and his wife Rosario, each of them being the beneficiary of the other.

>  In Mar. 1949, the spouses were informed that the premium for Jan 1949 was still unpaid notwithstanding that the 31-day grace period has already expired, and they were furnished at the same time long-form health certificates for the reinstatement of the policies.

>  In Apr 1949, they submitted the certificates and paid the premiums.

>  In Jan. 1950, Rosario died of acute dilation of the heart, and thereafter, Patricio filed a claim for the proceeds of the insurance.

>  US life denied the claim and filed for the rescission of the contract on the ground that the certificates failed to disclose that Rosario had been suffering from bronchial asthma for 3 years prior to their submission.


Issue:

Whether or not the contract can still be rescinded.


Held:


Yes.

The insurer is once again given two years from the date of reinstatement to investigate into the veracity of the facts represented by the insured in the application for reinstatement.  When US life sought to rescind the contract on the ground of concealment/misrepresentation, two years had not yet elapsed.  Hence, the contract can still be rescinded.


Soliman v. US Life- Rescind Contract of Insurance

Soliman v. US Life- Rescind Contract of Insurance

104 PHIL 1046

Facts:

>  US Life issued a 20 yr endowment life policy on the joint lives of Patricio Soliman and his wife Rosario, each of them being the beneficiary of the other.

>  In Mar. 1949, the spouses were informed that the premium for Jan 1949 was still unpaid notwithstanding that the 31-day grace period has already expired, and they were furnished at the same time long-form health certificates for the reinstatement of the policies.

>  In Apr 1949, they submitted the certificates and paid the premiums.

>  In Jan. 1950, Rosario died of acute dilation of the heart, and thereafter, Patricio filed a claim for the proceeds of the insurance.

>  US life denied the claim and filed for the rescission of the contract on the ground that the certificates failed to disclose that Rosario had been suffering from bronchial asthma for 3 years prior to their submission.


Issue:

Whether or not the contract can still be rescinded.


Held:


Yes.

The insurer is once again given two years from the date of reinstatement to investigate into the veracity of the facts represented by the insured in the application for reinstatement.  When US life sought to rescind the contract on the ground of concealment/misrepresentation, two years had not yet elapsed.  Hence, the contract can still be rescinded.


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

CF SHARP & CO.,…

CF SHARP & CO., INC. V. NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC.  381 SCRA 314 FACTS: Petitioner  was  authorized  to  sell  tickets  of  Northwest  Airlines-Japan,  but failed  to  remit  the  proceeds.    This  prompted  NWA  to  file  suit  against petitioner  in...

Read more

GALLAR v. HUSAIN

GALLAR v. HUSAINIf the action is brought by the one who is in possession of the land, the action is imprescriptible; otherwise, it could prescribe.FACTS:Husains in this case are the heirs of Teodoro Husain. Teodoro Husain sold the land under dispute ...

Read more

ESSO V. CIR- Tests …

For an item to be deductible as a business expense, the expense must be ordinary and necessary; it must be paid or incurred within the taxable year; and it must be paid or incurred in carrying on a trade or business. In addition, the taxpayer must su...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook