A+ A A-

CITIZENSHIP - Citizens by election

CITIZENSHIP - Citizens by election


Co v. HRET

- representative; 2nd District of Samar; election of citizenship – The exercise of the right to suffrage and the participation in election exercises constitute a positive act of election of Philippine citizenship; Any election of Philippine citizenship on the part of Jose Ong would not only have been superfluous but would also have resulted in absurdity considering that it was the law itself that had already elected Philippine citizenship for him.


In re: Ching

– permission to take the lawyer’s oath; Ching elected Filipino citizenship beyond the required “upon
reaching the age of majority” – If the citizenship of a person was subject to challenge under the old charter, it remains subject to challenge under the new charter even if the judicial challenge had not been commenced before the effectivity of the new Constitution; CA 625 and the 1935 Constitution did not prescribe a time within which the election of Philippine citizenship should be made; “reasonable time”; “upon reaching the age of majority” – it was clearly beyond by any reasonable yardstick, the able period to exercise the privilege.


CITIZENSHIP - Citizens by election

CITIZENSHIP - Citizens by election


Co v. HRET

- representative; 2nd District of Samar; election of citizenship – The exercise of the right to suffrage and the participation in election exercises constitute a positive act of election of Philippine citizenship; Any election of Philippine citizenship on the part of Jose Ong would not only have been superfluous but would also have resulted in absurdity considering that it was the law itself that had already elected Philippine citizenship for him.


In re: Ching

– permission to take the lawyer’s oath; Ching elected Filipino citizenship beyond the required “upon
reaching the age of majority” – If the citizenship of a person was subject to challenge under the old charter, it remains subject to challenge under the new charter even if the judicial challenge had not been commenced before the effectivity of the new Constitution; CA 625 and the 1935 Constitution did not prescribe a time within which the election of Philippine citizenship should be made; “reasonable time”; “upon reaching the age of majority” – it was clearly beyond by any reasonable yardstick, the able period to exercise the privilege.


BATASnatin The Firm

Lawyers in the Philippines

Latest @ Forums

Popular

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

SUGGESTED ANSWERS …

ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...

Read more

Oral Defamation l S…

Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation   Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood   Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander   A. Factor...

Read more

Article I – THE NAT…

Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...

Read more

Random

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

DE GARCIA V. CA 37 …

DE GARCIA V. CA37 SCRA 160FACTS:Guevarra was the owner of a lady’s diamond ring with white gold mounting, solitaire 2-karat diamond as well as 4 brills. It was stolen from her house. On a relevant date, while she was talking to Garcia, an owner of a ...

Read more

MEDEL V. CA, 299 SC…

FACTS:   Four loans were involved in this case. The first loan was  secured by the spouses Medel from Gonzales in the amount of P50,000 wherein P3,000 was withheld by the latter as advance interest.  This was secured by a promissory note. The secon...

Read more

RIGHT TO COMPULSORY…

WHAT IS THE RIGHT TO COMPULSORY PROCESS? > It  is  the  right  of  the  accused  to  have  a  subpoena  and/or  a subpoena duces tecum issued in his behalf in order to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of evidence  WHAT  HAPPENS  ...

Read more

Featured

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

Right to Strike

SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...

Read more

People vs. Tolentin…

G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...

Read more

Perfection Of A Con…

In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...

Read more


BATASnatin.com- The Best Philippine Law Library

Login

Sign in with Facebook