
CITIZENSHIP - Citizens by election
Category: Constitutional Law
CITIZENSHIP - Citizens by election
Co v. HRET
- representative; 2nd District of Samar; election of citizenship – The exercise of the right to suffrage and the participation in election exercises constitute a positive act of election of Philippine citizenship; Any election of Philippine citizenship on the part of Jose Ong would not only have been superfluous but would also have resulted in absurdity considering that it was the law itself that had already elected Philippine citizenship for him.
In re: Ching
– permission to take the lawyer’s oath; Ching elected Filipino citizenship beyond the required “upon
reaching the age of majority” – If the citizenship of a person was subject to challenge under the old charter, it remains subject to challenge under the new charter even if the judicial challenge had not been commenced before the effectivity of the new Constitution; CA 625 and the 1935 Constitution did not prescribe a time within which the election of Philippine citizenship should be made; “reasonable time”; “upon reaching the age of majority” – it was clearly beyond by any reasonable yardstick, the able period to exercise the privilege.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
Popular in BATASnatin:
- Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORY - - 18474 Hits
- The Powers Of The President Of The Philippines - - 6946 Hits
- 1987, 1973, 1935 Philippines Constitution Compared/ Comparison Matrix - - 6543 Hits
- NPC v. Ibrahim, et al., G.R. No. 168732, June 29, 2007- Eminent Domain - - 5696 Hits
- Fundamental Powers of the State - - 5474 Hits
CITIZENSHIP - Citizens by election
Category: Constitutional Law
CITIZENSHIP - Citizens by election
Co v. HRET
- representative; 2nd District of Samar; election of citizenship – The exercise of the right to suffrage and the participation in election exercises constitute a positive act of election of Philippine citizenship; Any election of Philippine citizenship on the part of Jose Ong would not only have been superfluous but would also have resulted in absurdity considering that it was the law itself that had already elected Philippine citizenship for him.
In re: Ching
– permission to take the lawyer’s oath; Ching elected Filipino citizenship beyond the required “upon
reaching the age of majority” – If the citizenship of a person was subject to challenge under the old charter, it remains subject to challenge under the new charter even if the judicial challenge had not been commenced before the effectivity of the new Constitution; CA 625 and the 1935 Constitution did not prescribe a time within which the election of Philippine citizenship should be made; “reasonable time”; “upon reaching the age of majority” – it was clearly beyond by any reasonable yardstick, the able period to exercise the privilege.
Related Philippine Law Resources:
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
Popular in BATASnatin:
- Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORY - - 18474 Hits
- The Powers Of The President Of The Philippines - - 6946 Hits
- 1987, 1973, 1935 Philippines Constitution Compared/ Comparison Matrix - - 6543 Hits
- NPC v. Ibrahim, et al., G.R. No. 168732, June 29, 2007- Eminent Domain - - 5696 Hits
- Fundamental Powers of the State - - 5474 Hits
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 1 week ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
DE GARCIA V. CA 37 …
DE GARCIA V. CA37 SCRA 160FACTS:Guevarra was the owner of a lady’s diamond ring with white gold mounting, solitaire 2-karat diamond as well as 4 brills. It was stolen from her house. On a relevant date, while she was talking to Garcia, an owner of a ...
Read moreMEDEL V. CA, 299 SC…
FACTS: Four loans were involved in this case. The first loan was secured by the spouses Medel from Gonzales in the amount of P50,000 wherein P3,000 was withheld by the latter as advance interest. This was secured by a promissory note. The secon...
Read moreRIGHT TO COMPULSORY…
WHAT IS THE RIGHT TO COMPULSORY PROCESS? > It is the right of the accused to have a subpoena and/or a subpoena duces tecum issued in his behalf in order to compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of evidence WHAT HAPPENS ...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

