
Duty Of Arresting Officer
Category: Criminal Procedure
Duty Of Arresting Officer
Sec. 3. Duty of arresting officer. – It shall be the duty of the officer executing the warrant to arrest the accused and deliver him to the nearest police station or jail without unnecessary delay.
WHAT IS THE DUTY OF THE ARRESTING OFFICER WHO ARRESTS A PERSON?
> He must deliver the person immediately to the nearest jail or police station
WHY SHOULD HE DELIVER? WHAT IS THE EVIL SOUGHT TO BE AVOIDED?
> This is to avoid situations when the officer will hold the law in his own hands
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
Duty Of Arresting Officer
Category: Criminal Procedure
Duty Of Arresting Officer
Sec. 3. Duty of arresting officer. – It shall be the duty of the officer executing the warrant to arrest the accused and deliver him to the nearest police station or jail without unnecessary delay.
WHAT IS THE DUTY OF THE ARRESTING OFFICER WHO ARRESTS A PERSON?
> He must deliver the person immediately to the nearest jail or police station
WHY SHOULD HE DELIVER? WHAT IS THE EVIL SOUGHT TO BE AVOIDED?
> This is to avoid situations when the officer will hold the law in his own hands
Newer Philippine Law Resources:
Additional Law Reading:
BATASnatin The Firm
Latest @ Forums
-
-
- Shema Corporation legal ba?
- In General Discussion
- 1 week ago
-
-
-
- foreclosed property, i need guides please help me
- In I Need A Lawyer!
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
-
-
- i cant access even the demo
- In Law MCQuizzer
- 2 weeks, 4 days ago
-
Popular
- 1
- 2
- 3
SUGGESTED ANSWERS …
ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS IN POLITICAL LAW ARRANGED BY TOPIC (1990 – 2006) Edited and Arranged by:Silliman University College of Law Batch 2005Updated by:DondeeD’ BAR-Retake 2007 From the ANSWERS TO BAR EXAMINATION QUESTIONS by the UP LAW COMPLEX & PHILIPPINE ASSOCIATION OF LAW SCHO...
Read moreOral Defamation l S…
Kinds and Definition of Slander or Oral Defamation Definition: Speaking of base and defamatory words which tend to prejudice another in his reputation, office, trade, business or means of livelihood Two kinds of oral or verbal defamation: (1) Grave Slander (2) Simple Slander A. Factor...
Read moreArticle I – THE NAT…
Article I – THE NATIONAL TERRITORYThe national territory of the Philippines comprises:1) the Philippine archipelago;2) all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdictionPHILIPPINE ARCHIPELAGO – that body of water studded with islands which is delineated in the Treaty of...
Read moreRandom
- 1
- 2
- 3
People vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read moreYam v. CA, G.R. No.…
May the corporation, through its president condone penalties and charges after it had been placed under receivership? No. The appointment of a receiver operates to suspend the authority of a corporation and of its directors and officers over its ...
Read moreMWSS V. CA 143 SCRA…
MWSS V. CA 143 SCRA 623 FACTS: The Dagupan City filed a case against petitioner for the recovery of ownership and possession of the Dagupan Waterworks System. MWSS contended that through a law, it was vested ownership over all wa...
Read moreFeatured
- 1
- 2
- 3
Right to Strike
SSSEA v. CA – right to strike – At present, in the absence of any legislation in government employees the right to strike, recognizing their right to do so, or regulating the exercise of such right, they are prohibited form striking by express prohi...
Read morePeople vs. Tolentin…
G.R. No. 176385, February 26, 2008 FACTS: On 13 February 1998, three separate informations of Murder and two counts of Frustrated Murder were filed before the RTC against appellants, together with accused Jimmy Trinidad and Arnel Trinidad. The murd...
Read morePerfection Of A Con…
In Oesmer, Jr., et al. v. Paraiso Dev. Corp., G.R. No. 157493, February 5, 2007, a contract to sell was entered into by the owners of a real property. They affixed their signatures but contested its validity later contending that their co-owner had n...
Read more

